"Since Xerox in 1970s"
Apple ripped off Xerox and no-one else should be allowed to copy them doing so!
2410 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Dec 2009
and I will read your punch cards fine. (Technically, learning to read them by eye should be no harder than depyphering any obscure ancient language we still have some references for).
Poor choice of example, but the point in general is more sound, though, building a crude but working DVD-reading device would be well within the capabilities of any undergrad EE student provided a record of how the thing works is postered on the archive wall somewhere (if there are no EE students by that time, then it is unlikely anyone will really be interested in the disk contents anyway).
The 3-5 years quoted for current recordable media is worst-case with the cheapest crappiest media you can lay hands on (though since that is what most people buy, I won't call shinanigans on the figure). Decent media lasts around 5-7 years for re-writable and 10-15 for write-once, in my experience. You can also get quite expensive 'archival grade' media with dyes guarenteed for 50 years, but try convincing the bean-counters to foot that bill - though asking them to recover a 10yo record from optical archives may convince them!
I very much want one of these myself, but doubt I could really justify the cost for my occasional usage. Fortunately my manager at work was discussing issues of HDD vs Optical archiving with me yesterday and we certainly could justify one (or three) at work, and I am happy to pay for my own media if I can use the drives at work to burn them.
People inciting violence via social networks et.al. should be rather easy to trace after the fact. Restricting the networks won't stop the inciting of violence, but it will push it to channels that don't leave a bright shining data trail back to the perp.
Find them and throw the whole damn legal library at them all. Leave an example that will make future riot organisers thing realy hard about what they intend.
I'd go as far as to suggest that they count the number of people demonstrably taking part in the riots and divvy up the punishments for the ones that can't be identified amongst any proved inciters (on top of their own punishments).
is that the Kinect's view would probably become a bit fish-eyed and software may be less resilient at identifyiny the body's placement in the scene with the distortion, particularly around the edges. Only real-world testing would show if it is enough of an effect to matter.
It will reduce the /apparent/ size of what the kinect 'sees', which is what you want, because you are going to be standing closer, which makes your apparent size bigger again to compensate. Using it without moving closer to the device would, of course, do as you suggest, but that is not the point.
A better analogy than 'binoculars backwards' would be macro-mode on a digital camera - it still has the same k-pixels in the image, but the subject has to be a lot closer to the lense to fill the frame.
that every dollar extra paid for one lot of over-priced retail goods is then not spent elsewhere. The money saved online doesn't just disapear - it is still in the consumer's wallet waiting to be spent elsewhere in the economy. Taking it off them at the point of importation just means it is not available to go into some other part of the retail sector a few days-weeks later, so no real win on average and probably a loss averall for all involved (except the tax man).
I am prety sure if you replaced 'wind farm' with 'coal plant' throughout that report the only difference would be the socioeconomic bracket of those directly effected. Which isn't to say it isn't a problem, but how much air-show the problem gets is definitely related to who it is a problem for, as well as the problem's current novelty value.
Contracts are for clarifying rights/responsibilities under the law. They are not accepted to replace the law or any parts of.
Same reason most click-through EULAs are not worth the paper they are printed on - they are either re-iterating existing law or contradicting it, neither of which means much in a court.
then the disks go into the fire-safe (or at least a moisture-proof container) to stay as pristine as possible (well, it is the box you are keeping away from the moisture, the disks away from scratches and grubby human fingers).
This is technically illegal, not becasue you made a play-copy to protect origional media, but because you bypassed DRM to do so.
Sux to be under the machine. :-(
CS5 requires a 64-bit OS (XP-64 is as flakey as a certain yellow-wrappered chocolate bar).
I know your comment was in jest (and it made me snigger). I am just bitter at having to manage two labs of PCs running ancient Adobe software until the IT department convinces itself Win7 is not going to go all Vista on them.