* Posts by John Lilburne

1026 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Dec 2009

Fork it! Google fined €4.34bn over Android, has 90 days to behave

John Lilburne

Re: You can't fork Android

I don't want any Google shite apps on the phone. I have an old S3 which has crap like Google Play Books, Google Play Newsstand, Google+, gmail, etc. I'm never going to use any of that stuff so why should it be there taking up memory? I want rid of it. For several weeks the phone kept wanting to download some update and constantly failing. Today apparently its no longer doing that maybe it eventually managed to do the update I don't care I just wanted it not to do it anyway.

Neil Young slams Google, after you log in to read his rant with Google or Facebook

John Lilburne

Re: ...not have the best grasp of tech...

I don't think advising on getting a sexually transmitted disease is the correct thing to do.

Call your MEP! Wikipedia blacks out for European YouTube vote

John Lilburne

Re: The people who run Wikipedia

They will all be sockpuppets of this one:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/05/verity_stob_wikipedia/

John Lilburne

Re: The problem I have so far...

"or using our work without our permission to promote ideas or organisations we object to, then we tend to get a bit shirty"

Indeed one of the memes currently being used by the supporters of Masnick, DFoctrow, the EFF and others has been so adopted by racists and anti-Semites that the creator has dropped the character from his comic.

https://thetrichordist.com/2018/07/02/saveyourinternet-dog-whistle-to-far-right-with-pepe-desperation-or-stupidity/

John Lilburne

Re: The problem I have so far...

"practice of slapping dumb jokes on random photos"

This can be a major problem when a photographer takes an iconic photo which perchance is appropriated by the dumbfucks on the interwebs. The result being that the photo is debased and whatever value it had for the photographer is sucked out. An example is supplied by the cretinous Google shill Masnick here

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150908/00155432189/getty-images-goes-copyright-trolling-after-meme-penguin.shtml

the problem being that the meme cause the photographer to be unable to license the photo because who wants to buy a license for something that is used as a joke?

Switching to Wales, I don't think he has ever seen an example of IP theft that he didn't approve of. His organization has also been known to bully and threaten a 12 yo kid for several weeks over a butterfly photo, turning it into an existential threat to the site itself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=566879506#Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Doleschallia_bisaltide_bisaltide_(Autumn_Leaf)_-_male,_January_2013,_Singapore.jpg

MSDN unleashes a fresh round of unintentional innuendo bingo

John Lilburne

Just a minute ...

Kenneth Williams speaking on JAM on the subject of Cults.

I am a cult, I am. I often hear people say as I walk past "Ooooh look at him, he's a right cult."

Buzzed for repetition of "I'm"

JURI's out, Euro copyright votes in: Whoa, did the EU just 'break the internet'?

John Lilburne

Re: bad for small sites

Don't be daft. The vast majority of the ones rejected are because they URL has already been reported. IOW they aren't malicious they are duplicates, the URL in question has already been removed.

John Lilburne

Re: bad for small sites

Multiple flaws here:

1. A small website won't have millions of uploads by users requiring automatic checking.

2. There is no requirement for a website to check the validity of a takedown request.

3. The number of malicious takedown requests are (according to Google) extremely small.

I doubt that one could point to more than a few dozen in the last 20 years.

4. There is no penalty for an uploader mistakenly thinking that their use is OK.

Men are officially the worst… top-level domain

John Lilburne

Re: Throw in others and...

True. When I cared, I blocked all signups to the company user forum from gmail, hotmail, and yahoo. Spammer signups dropped from 200+ per day to about a dozen a month. We made exceptions for genuine users (about 10 over a 4 year period).

Open Source Security hit with bill for defamation claim

John Lilburne

Re: Waiting for the other shoe to drop

Wait on the EFF are getting involved on behalf of Perens ... that has got to be the kiss of death.

Shock: Google advises UK peers against more legislation

John Lilburne

Independent? Really!

"many of Google's arguments were reiterated by independent academics and organisations"

I thought that many of "independent academics and organisations" turned out to be paid shills for big tech, or nothing more than astroturfing shell organisations.

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/24/google_amended_shills_list/

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/26/google_astroturf_email/

Trump’s new ZTE tweet trumps old ZTE tweets that trumped his first ZTE tweet

John Lilburne

Re: Toddler

"At which point her Majesties cabinet would be transported to Guantanamo Bay."

Is there a down side to that?

US Senator Ron Wyden to Pentagon: Encrypt your websites

John Lilburne

"it does, however, mean bad security practices"

No it doesn't. Seems you have swallowed a whole bunch of Google crap.

Had another phone call from web host yesterday wanting to sell me some SSL cert. Whining about lack of said site would cause it to be downgraded by Google search. Being as the site has no user login, no user commenting, no sales cart, and is linked to by Washington State University, University of Texas, University of North Carolina, Oxford University, National Academy of Science SF, National Academy of Science Mexico City, British Parliament, University College London, Natural History Museum London, Natural History Museum Venice, etc, etc, it is most likely not going to be downgraded unless Google want to degrade their search.

Google listens to New Zealand just long enough to ignore it

John Lilburne

You are on to something there. When a French ISP blocked Google ads, Google whined that it was costing them $millions a week.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/9781425/Advertisers-angered-as-French-ISP-rolls-out-ad-blocking-software.html

Zuckerberg gets a night off: Much-hyped Euro grilling was all smoke, absolutely no heat

John Lilburne

Re: Pub Fight

Just chuck Zuck down an oubliette, and tell Trump that Russia was all Zuck's fault. Job done.

Hitler 'is dead' declares French prof who gazed at dictator's nashers

John Lilburne

Re: Still I don't understand why Russian doesn't allow full tests.

Both of them need to keep Alex Jones frothing at nothing at all.

US Congress mulls expanding copyright yet again – to 144 years

John Lilburne

Re: how long before...

OK this is how stupid the EFF and Doctrow are being about this. Without the classics act the copyright protection is not one single Federal statute but is based on State by State protection and some of States do indeed have perpetual copyright terms. The EFF and Doctrow should careful that they don't get what they ask for.

John Lilburne

Re: RIAA factoid #17: the Missing Mozarts

Of the top of my head both Schubert and Handel made a shed load of money from copyright.

John Lilburne

Re: Crony Capitalism at it's best

"I'm reminded of a lyric from David Bowie's Life on Mars:"

I'm reminded that Bowie's estate can now claim license for each time Spotify et al stream that song. Odd that had he recorded it in 1972 they would have been no issues. But hey lets have the EFF etc tell us why a song recorded in on 01/01/1972 get a Federal copyright but one recorded on 31/12/1971 doesn't.

John Lilburne

"Curiously, 14 years is also what some (modern) économistes have found to be the ideal copyright duration..."

The LOTR was published in 1955 a film version was produced some 56 years later and 38 years after JRRT's death. Accordingly it should have just been a freebie to Hollywood?

Android devs prepare to hit pause on ads amid Google GDPR chaos

John Lilburne

Re: Consent

"Hang on, that can't be right as it is the opposite of how Google are selling their services....I'm so confused"

Just because that can do X doesn't mean that X is effective. It used to be that tobacco companies advertised their products as good for your throat etc, one wonders why it is that tech companies don't have to prove their claims?

https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/kzpajy/12-slightly-unbelievable-adverts-for-booze-and-cigarettes

Govts should police... Google's algorithms, says News Corp chief

John Lilburne

Google brings nothing to this table ...

All of your examples posit something different replacing the old. Google does not bring anything different to the table its the same people generating the content, the content is the same all that is happening here is that Google devalues what monetary value that content had.

Devalue it enough and you end up with click bait, fake news, uninformed tripe, and regurgitate pulp music, films, and novels.

Oh ...!

John Lilburne

Re: Google gives stuff for free!?!?

Incorrect News Corp had a business long before the founders of Google were conceived. Similarly writers, film companies, musicians, and photographers had a business long before the parents of the Google founders went through puberty, and should Google and its like disappear overnight all of those groups will still have a business. This is not a symbiotic relationship it is a parasitic one.

John Lilburne

Google gives stuff for free!?!?

"since they give away free stuff (often other people's stuff) for free - then the consumer always wins."

Just what percentage of the IP that Google gives away is Google's to give away compared to that of other people?

As far as I can see if it wasn't for exploiting other people's IP Google wouldn't have a business at all.

Southend Airport tests drone detection system

John Lilburne

“We do not have any outstanding issues ..."

But, but, but ... isn't Southend-on-Sea chav centrral.

Make masses carry their mobes, suggests wig in not-at-all-creepy speech

John Lilburne

Doesn't matter

It will be extensible. Your partner, friend, child will have it on and it doesn't take much to intuit that if A is at location X then B will almost certainly be there too. Besides you all have a habit of signing into FB with A is at X with B and C.

Cisco cancels all YouTube ads, then conceals cancellation

John Lilburne

Re: priorities

Ah but some biz don't want to have their ads on a page with videos showing how to mainline heroine, or cut someone's head off, or which are the best anti-black/jew/homosexual chants de jour.

Sueballs flying over Facebook's Android app data slurping

John Lilburne

Android is eminently pwnable ...

... then it seems.

Password re-use is dangerous, right? So what about stopping it with password-sharing?

John Lilburne

Re: A site might know if two visitors to that site have the same password

"The algorithm for password salting should include the username in the hashing process"

I would have thought that the time that the user created the account would be used then "user same login, same password" would be different across multiple sites and uname:pword-hash would be useless to hackers without the third part of the puzzle.

Firefox to feature sponsored content as of next week

John Lilburne

Re: Really?

Quarter of a $billion a year in software development. WTF it is a browser its not as if the problem is unknown and its not as if they are starting from scratch each year, and they happen to have a bunch of freetards contributing to it. Then a another $60 million of typists.

John Lilburne

Re: Not buying it - This is a badly timed Slippery Slope

Didn't they get $300 million a year from Google back in 2012 in order to be the default search engine?

https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-paying-mozilla-300-million-per-year-for-search-deal/

Then yahoo were paying them $300 million for the last three years, and now we are back with Google again.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-14/google-pays-to-put-search-engine-back-on-firefox-browser-in-u-s

Can someone explain how it is that they've blown through $1.5 billion?

if dev == woman then dont_be(asshole): Stack Overflow tries again to be more friendly to non-male non-pasty coders

John Lilburne

Re: "Mansplaining"

"received a response that begun by explaining how to use a ratchet wrench."

That sounds exactly like StackOverflow. Either that or there is someone answering the question that they wished you had asked, or whining that the question was already asked back in 2008.

Audiophiles have really taken to the warm digital tone of streaming music

John Lilburne

I have to admit that streaming and downloading is more practical.

I have a handful of downloaded albums and I always have the thought that I'm missing something or other. But then I do mostly have works which benefit from liner notes etc. An English translation of some Mande lyrics tends to be helpful.

UK consumer help bloke Martin Lewis is suing Facebook over fake ads

John Lilburne

Re: 15 year olds and advertising

Under 18s can purchase food, clothes and property, both of which are a form of contract. The under 18 may at some point repudiate some contracts, but not those entered into for basics such as food and clothes. However, having repudiated the contract they cannot then retain the benefits of the contract.

John Lilburne

The Royal Mail accepts items and delivers them given the correct postage. It doesn't examine the contents. FB would like you to believe that it similarly accepts money for an advert and doesn't examine the content. Yet it examines all other content that goes through its site and further targets user based on the advert's content. A question to ask is how many adverts for semtex, or explicit porn are distributed on FB and if they can keep those things off grannies FB page they can keep all sorts of stuff off too.

Apple's magical quality engineering strikes again: You may want to hold off that macOS High Sierra update...

John Lilburne

Re: Apple Update Time

XP was the OS that they mostly screwed over. In fact what usually went wrong was the iPod driver. Why they would want to update a working driver with a copy of itself is any one's guss. But after an install iTunes could never access the iPod nano, and the driver reported being screwed. So long as you re-installed iTunes before anything else was reloaded onto a new build one was OK, but 6+ months later an iTunes update would screw the driver again. When borked I had a number of Apple support people try to fix the issue all to no avail. After the last cycle I turned off apple updates. The screw up doesn't happen on win10, but they did manage to fuxor the iPod touch with an iOS update last September, something about the update looking for data on a non-existent/badly configured apple server.

John Lilburne

Re: Apple Update Time

Apple updates are like a box of chocolate covered turds.

iTunes updates caused me to reinstall windows on 4 occasions. Last autumn they bricked the iPod touch for 4 days. Every other iTunes update screws up the last.fm plugin.

Tech bribes: What's the WORST one you've ever been offered?

John Lilburne

Re: First of all, I don't accept bribes. Ever. Personal policy.

I'm not above rubies and emeralds.

Facebook faces foe formation in facial fingering fight

John Lilburne

Re: There are news Facebook would like to activate face recognition in Europe...

On flickr user A's ability to tag user B in a photo is controlled by user B. Been like that for years and years.

Cambridge Analytica's ex-CEO decides not to front UK Parliamentary Committee again

John Lilburne

Re: Can they summons Zuck?

"Haven't they learned a lesson that WE the People don't want this shit. "

There are numerous people and organisations that scan all photos uploaded to FB doing facial recognition and the Niqab won't help because they can also use gait recognition now too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNZrq2iK87k

John Lilburne

Re: Still waiting....

Doesn't need to be Russian per se. Authoritarian right (or left) wing fucktards stick together.

'Dear Mr F*ckingjoking': UK PM Theresa May's mass marketing missive misses mark

John Lilburne

Re: Dear valued donor...

"Hard to image that a party volunteer would be so childish, even if unpaid."

Boris and Mogg spring to mind.

UK.gov expected to quit controversial harvesting of schoolchildren's nationality data

John Lilburne

Re: But....

And besides there is a Google app for that anyway.

COPPA load of this FTC complaint: YouTube accused of collecting children's data

John Lilburne

Re: B, but... I also watch my little poney!

Bronies, doncha just luv em.

John Lilburne

Re: Heaven Forbid

"how do they know wether they are under 13?"

By deduction and common sense. Someone that is watching primarily toy and cartoon vids is more likely to be a child than a 30s something. It doesn't take AI or any advanced algorithms to work that out.

Furious gunwoman opens fire at YouTube HQ, three people shot

John Lilburne

Re: Of all places

"What will is finding the root cause and fixing that."

Well in situations like this it is either a pissed off spouse, or an out-of-sorts employee. A third option given that it is YT would be someone aggrieved about the abysmal rates per video stream.

Mac fans' eyes mist over: Someone's re-created HyperCard

John Lilburne

Re: That reminds me...

"I may be wrong, but I think a Windows analogue also showed up, called ToolBook."

Apparently they were all based on an AtariST program called Zoomracks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoomracks

Parents blame brats' slipping school grades on crap internet speeds

John Lilburne

Until the last 18mths I had internet speeds of approx 4Mbit. At times it could be 1.5Mb and at good times 5Mbit. This was plenty enough for accessing credibility impaired sites like wikipedia and you could listen to some YT video, it might take you a long, long time to download some ripped blu-ray film but they shouldn't be doing that anyway.

Zucker for history: What I learnt about Facebook 600 years ago

John Lilburne

Re: Good article

"English Protestantism started because Henry VIII wanted to get he leg over Anne Boleyn."

Oh it started long before that with the Lollards, and we now know that H8 could have got his leg over Boleyn if he'd sent the Vatican a couple of cart loads of choirboys.

Cambridge Analytica CEO suspended – and that's not even the worst news for them today

John Lilburne

Re: Shame.

Classifying other people as non-human is a slippery slope towards fascism and the final solution.

Think it through.

I did and it isn't the same. With regards to the holocaust that was perpetrated against people who could not help being Jewish, Slavic, Gypsy, Homosexual, or having a genetic illness.

In the cases here we have a group of people that choose to be utter bellends, and lying bastards.