* Posts by VinceH

3483 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Nov 2009

Fleeing Facebook app users realise what they agreed to in apps years ago – total slurpage

VinceH

Re: I'm (not) sorry

"I have already informed my family and friends that SMS and phone communications from non-whitelisted mobile numbers will be ignored. Numbers are whitelisted only when I have extracted a commitment from its owner not to run spyware on their device - and when I trust the owner to keep their word. If they're not happy to do this, they will need to get used to calling me from a landline, or using plain, old e-mail."

It doesn't matter if you whitelist them or not. The person at the other end of the call - irrespective of whether you answer or ignore it - has your number. They're using it to call you. If it's in their mobile phone, and they're using the Facebook or Messenger app, bang, Facebook has your number - and depending on what else the caller has in their phone regarding you, they have that as well.

All you are achieving is for Facebook's data to show that these people called you, but didn't get an answer, rather than did.

As Snorlax said - that's bonkers, mental shit that takes the biscuit. And its a pointless biscuit at that.

The best you can do, until the regulators and enforcers wake up and take some proper action*, is try to limit what the likes of Facebook can collate about you - strict cookie management, different email addresses for different log-ins, and so on. They'll still garner shit about you, but won't be able to piece it all together and associate it with a single identity**.

In most cases, anyway. (Which I think I'll try to write in more detail about this coming weekend).

* I've seen elsewhere comments to the effect that they need to "nip this in the bud" - but I think we're a long way past that.

** Just for a laugh, I downloaded my own data from Facebook this morning - the file was laughably empty. I'm sure they have more data on me than what is there, but haven't been able to link it to my account.

VinceH

Colour me surprised.

No, really. I definitely am surprised. You can tell by just how hard I am trying to look it. Honestly.

UK watchdog finally gets search warrant for Cambridge Analytica's totally not empty offices

VinceH

Re: Elvis has left the building

"Here's the logic. You are running queries against a data set of potentially 50 million users, what server do you need for that and how much disk space is required? Do we believe they could fit it in an office in London? Lets not be stupid, it's in a cloud instance somewhere or at a proper data centre."

The actual data in question isn't the only thing that would count as evidence. There would also have been documentation related to it, whether that's in paper form (all the way down to post-it notes that could have something incriminating written on them), electronic form (emails, text messages), invoices and receipts, entries in accounting records, and so on. It's important to find as much of this as possible - even if each element on its own doesn't look like much - then put the jigsaw together.

The actual data itself would be a massive bonus. The chances of that still being there is slim to none - the chances of there being any of the above is also slim, but greater than the data in question. (The more disparate the pieces of the jigsaw, the harder it is to hide it all away/dispose of it).

VinceH

"They suggested that the application for the warrant was flawed because, among other things, CA had offered to allow the ICO access to its offices, subject to agreeing the terms and scope of access with the regulator."

Where the "terms and scope of access" presumably included not being able to look in places CA didn't want them to.

UK's data watchdog seizes suspected Scottish nuisance caller's kit

VinceH

"ICO gets search warrant... for firm accused of jamming up railway safety hotline"

Worth noting that about half an hour ago, @ICOnews said on Twitter:

"ICO granted warrant: We’re pleased with the decision of the judge and we plan to execute the warrant shortly. This is just one part of a larger investigation into the use of personal data for political purposes and we will now need time to collect and consider the evidence"

Though I do wonder how long "shortly" will be. Probably best not to rush, in case there is still evidence to be disposed of. Monday morning will probably do.

Mozilla pulls ads from Facebook after spat over privacy controls

VinceH

Re: If you want privacy...

Well, I created my new account a couple of years ago, and only started occasionally using it in the last few months - and I don't have a mobile set, so if they do insist it's very recent.

(I don't log-in often because, frankly, it's even more crap now than it used to be many years ago. So much so that despite saying around Christmas that I'd start using it again, I really can't be arsed - so I'm not bothering to look for and add friends; if anyone who knows me spots me on there, and they send a request, I'll probably accept it - but it's not happening the other way around. As a result, I have just three or four friends on there!)

I have spotted something odd, though - or perhaps creepy would be a better word. In fact, yes, I think creepy is a much better word, especially if preceded by "extremely fucking"

Specifically:

If I go into my ad settings on Facebook, under "Your interests" it lists Plex.

I did install Plex in three places, and removed it again - prior to my new, limited use of Facebook. But I haven't "Liked" Plex on Facebook. I haven't even mentioned Plex on Facebook. There should be no way Facebook can know that I ever tried it - yet there it is.

(I do have suspicions about how it got there, but nothing concrete. I need to look into it a little more and write it up at some point.)

El Reg deep dive: Everything you need to know about UK.gov's pr0n block

VinceH
Facepalm

"Can be bypassed by putting in a fair bit of effort to steal a CC... you could say that about many things now but most people don't immediately turn to theft or identity fraud the moment they can't have something they want."

In this case, though, I can very easily see something like that happening in the case of teenagers. We know there will be ways to get around this blocking - and one of those ways will be to 'borrow' their dad's credit card without his knowledge. After all, they aren't actually buying anything, just using it to prove they are over 18, so he'll never find out. It'll be perfectly safe - what could possibly go wrong?

Surprise UK raid of Cambridge Analytica delayed: Nobody expects the British information commissioner!

VinceH

Should have bought shares in the stuff.

That long-awaited Mark Zuckerberg response: Everything's fine! Mostly fixed! Facebook's great! All good in the hoodie!

VinceH

Re: "I'm serious about doing what it takes to protect our community."

I think you got the order of importance slightly wrong there. It's the shareholders, the ad slingers, the data miners, then the developers, and the end users.

VinceH

Re: Facebook data use rules

But there is a 1b: If you do get caught, we'll try to minimise damage to ourselves. You can take as much of the blame as possible.

Brit MPs chide UK.gov: You're acting like EU data adequacy prep is easy

VinceH

"Hey, it looks like you're trying to leave the EU! Would you like some help with that?"

Note to El Reg: We need a Clippy icon!

Seen from spaaaaace: Boffins check world's oceans for plastic

VinceH

Re: While arguing about our entry into the Anthropocene

I putty the fool who doesn't get that.

Cambridge Analytica CEO suspended – and that's not even the worst news for them today

VinceH

Re: OK, that's it!

Hello Dragons, my pitch is for a smart popcorn machine. It will analyse news headlines before the user gets around to reading them and, based on the user's profile* will automatically start preparing the popcorn, ready for when the user will be reading the news for which they will most likely want popcorn...

* Which we really, really won't get from Facebook. Honest. And the users' data will all be perfectly safe with us, oh yes.

Addicts of Facebook and pals are easy prey for manipulative scumbags – thanks to tech giants' 'extraordinary reach'

VinceH
Unhappy

Re: Friends

"Pray tell, just how do you persuade someone who is addicted that they should care ?"

Indeed.

When this news started to break, my first thoughts were about how surprised I'm not.

I later realised that I am surprised after all - not about the news itself, but that other people are surprised. People who I've repeatedly warned about feeding too much information to sites like Facebook, that apps they run on it (and on their phones etc) may be leeching that information, and what it could be used for.

I've since come to realise that I shouldn't be surprised about that, either, because those people have pretty much consistently ignored what I've said, or at most acknowledged it to humour me, but carried on regardless.

Instead, I feel I should be surprised that now this news has broken, people are reading about it, watching it on TV... and then carrying on as normal, presumably because they think it's only other people affected by it.

I'm sure I should be surprised about that - it's the one thing I should be surprised about in all of this.

But strangely, I'm not.

China to offer recoverable satellites-as-a-service

VinceH
Joke

"More recent missions have allowed experiments to be conducted in microgravity, an environment China feels is a fine place to grow seeds that produce hardier plants than their terra-bound cousins."

That gives me an idea for a new line of business for someone - probably Amazon.

Grow stuff in orbit in a micro-gravity, and provide a (cooked) food delivery service; customer orders something from the menu, and the order is dropped on to them from orbit, using the heat of re-entry to cook it.

Brit retailer Currys PC World says sorry for Know How scam

VinceH

"Without my knowledge, approval or say so sold it to me as a business purchase with 30 days instead of 1 year warranty and opened me a business account too."

Yeah, I got caught similarly when I bought a desktop PC and a laptop a few years ago. The sales droid asked if it was a business purchase, which technically it was, so I said yes, blissfully unaware of their terms and conditions. It wasn't until after, that I spotted the much shorter 30 day warranty.

I'm a sole trader, so generally I get the same legal protections as an ordinary person for most (if not all) things - so I suspect the same would be true in this case. Luckily, I haven't had to find out, though - the kit has outlasted their dodgy business warranty and the one I would have had as a member of the public.

If I ever buy any kit there again, though, I'll be saying no to the business question.

Info Commissioner tears into Google's 'call us journalists' trial defence

VinceH

Re: Quite right too.

Allow me to extend the sentence to make it a little clearer:

You may as well replace the words "proper journalists" with just "others" - because it's not just in the area of journalism they leech off other people's work.

VinceH

Re: Quite right too.

You may as well replace the words "proper journalists" with just "others".

Android P will hear no evil, see no evil, support evil notches

VinceH
Joke

"Google's decided that "Android P restricts access to mic, camera, and all SensorManager sensors from apps that are idle." This change has been made to stop apps snooping, which is hard to argue against!"

Third party apps, you mean. Will they apply the restriction to their own stuff?

"Indoor positioning over WiFi, thanks to support for 802.11mc, aka WiFi Round-Trip-Time (RTT)"

Please allow this to be disabled. It'll give the police a clue as to which part of the basement to dig up to find the bodies. I spent more time on those spots to dig the holes, etc.

Yes, Alexa is all very well... but we want YOU to talk machine learning and AI

VinceH
Meh

Re: Alexa unexpected and unwarranted bursts of Creepy Laughter

I'd seen reports of that, and wondered if it was a case of someone uncovering a flaw and exploiting it in an amusing way to make a point. But from that article:

'The company suggested in an email that the laughs had occurred “in rare circumstances” because the speaker was picking up a “false positive” for the command “Alexa, laugh”. '

How disappointing.

Windows 10 S to become a 'mode', not a discrete product

VinceH

"In recent weeks El Reg has encountered rumours hinting at the demise of Windows 10 S."

Oh how I wish that sentence had two fewer characters immediately before the full stop.

Half the world warned 'Chinese space station will fall on you'

VinceH

Re: Does Tiangong-1 contain Chinese steel or aluminum?

"That has something to do with Limeys inflicting extraneous vowels on their American cousins"

Surely, it's only an extraneous vowel if it isn't pronounced - and we do.

Note: I hope the sound sample on that page pronounces it correctly. I didn't bother checking - but the phonetic version is correct, so probably. ;)

Inviting nearby exoplanet revealed as radiation-baked hell

VinceH

Re: Need I finish the book?

Is this the one where Spock gets off with Ivanova?

Symantec ends cheap Norton offer to NRA members

VinceH
Unhappy

Re: The Land of the Insane @timmyb

"No, advocating laws or policies based on nothing more than anecdotes without adequate objective and quantitative analysis is idiotic."

Are you really lowering a major, widely reported incident involving seventeen people, some as young as 14, being killed by an idiot with a gun (as well as any other previous such incidents, in schools or not, involving children or not) to the level of "nothing more than anecdotes"?

No need to answer that - it's rhetorical. Anyone reading this thread can see that's what you're doing, and I've no intention of looking back at it again.

VinceH

Re: The Land of the Insane @timmyb

"Please list the 8 mass school shootings in the USA so far this year."

Only one needs to be listed, because that one is already one too many.

And that applies to any "mass" shooting, not just at schools. Splitting hairs over what constitutes a "mass" shooting, or trying to narrow it down to only ones that take place at schools is just idiotic.

VinceH

Re: Please leave this place, you inhuman monster, and never return.

I'm assuming he's not referring to the current #MeToo movement but the more general virtue signalling type of "me too" which has long been a 'feature' of the internet (and probably goes back further).

Of course, I could be wrong and he could be, as you said, an inhuman monster.

The phone OS that muggers wouldn't touch is back from the dead

VinceH

"I'm sorry I've come over all funny all of a sudden"

And as Kai would be likely to say: "The dead do not come over all funny."

US state legal supremos show lots of love for proposed CLOUD Act (a law to snoop on citizens' info stored abroad)

VinceH

Re: Agents of SHIELD link

"Computers Located Overseas? Usurp Data!"

Farts away! Plane makes unscheduled stop after man won't stop guffing

VinceH
Coffee/keyboard

Re: Clear the area

@Steve K

"This is possibly the funniest thread ever written on flatulence:"

Icon says it all. And I haven't finished yet - the rest is saved for later!

Microsoft reveals 'limitations of apps and experiences on Arm' – then deletes from view

VinceH

"It takes a special person not to re-read your out of office before you set it. To be fair I think I've made that mistake once, which is something you learn from."

Ditto. The solution I've settled on is to change the out of office when I turn it off so that it reads as something more generic. Next time I turn it on, if I'm in a hurry and forget to edit it to add a date, it's still fine.

From July, Chrome will name and shame insecure HTTP websites

VinceH
Coat

Re: Dumb move

"Chrome sends everything you type even local network hosts off to the chocolate factory. No way that is secure. They don't care about security or privacy unless its _also_ an earner for them."

Just for fun, why not have your site browser sniff - and if it detects Chrome, display some appropriate text about the slurp-tastic nature of Google.

Apple's top-secret iBoot firmware source code spills onto GitHub for some insane reason

VinceH

" if only a few see the funny side then it's worth it"

Sometimes, if only a few see the funny side, that makes it funnier.

A Hughes failure: Flat Earther rocketeer can't get it up yet again

VinceH
Coat

Re: I’ve always wondered...

If the Earth did not rotate, I don't want to live on the dark side, but could we please make sure I'm located somewhere that it's permanently dusk? That would mean it's always evening, and that tomorrow would never come - which is when I would next have to go to work.

TIA.

Peers approve Brit film board as pr0n overlords despite concerns

VinceH

Re: "The government has done its best..."

"Riiiiiight... you mean you put it to one side in the hope people believe you thought about it for a few days and then assigned it to the BBFC 'because it's easier'.

FTFY!

VinceH
Coat

"Is there a pop up book on how the internet works they can read?"

If there is, I don't know - pop ups are blocked here.

Bluetooth 'Panty Buster' 'smart' sex toy fails penetration test

VinceH

That made me do a double take, too, until I followed the link in the article, and found:

"The mobile apps used to control those devices are not just an ordinary remote. The apps offer multiple features for communication and socializing like search for other users, maintaining a friends list, a video chat, a message board and also a feature to create and share image galleries, where images can be stored and shared with friends in the Vibratissimo social network."

No Windows 10, no Office 2019, says Microsoft

VinceH
Pint

Re: As soon as Windows 7 support finishes

@John Sanders

Ta - that line does appear to have done the trick. Wine 1.6.2 is no more.

The instructions on that page are what I was going to follow to install the new wine - but I didn't get beyond uninstalling the old one. Now I have:

vinceh@Deimos wine --version

wine-3.0

If we ever meet, I owe you a pint.

VinceH
Unhappy

Re: As soon as Windows 7 support finishes

WINE is currently on my most hated list of Linux software. I have version 1.6.2 installed on Mint, and wanted to upgrade the shiny new version, in the hope that I could get some more software I use on Windows running on Linux.

According to the WINE home page, I had to uninstall the old version first. Fair enough... except the bastard won't uninstall.

I first tried it using the Software Manager, and it seemed to work. Until I then came to install the new version, following the instructions on its home page. I forget the exact error, but the upshot is that it won't install because, apparently, I still have 1.6.2 installed.

Except I haven't if I try to use it - nothing that ran under WINE now runs under WINE.

Except I have if I try to install a new version.

Except I haven't if I try to uninstall it again.

Except I have if I type wine --version

Except I haven't if I try to use it... etc.

Head -> Desk.

Morrisons launches bizarre Yorkshire Pudding pizza thing

VinceH

Re: Improvements

All the improvements in the world would just take a calamity and turn it into a disaster.

I don't like pizza much, so I'm inclined to suggest the best thing to do with this monstrosity is add it to the cargo in a sun targeted rocket.

I am quite partial to one of those giant yorkshire puds filled with stew, though.

Dodgy parking firms to be denied access to Brit driver database

VinceH
Facepalm

Re: dodgy parking companies

"So 2 distinct visits to different car parks were falsely recorded by them as car being in same car park at 2 different times"

I suspect that's more down to incompetence / stupidity than anything else. They simply hadn't considered the possibility of someone using one shop/car park, going away, then coming back and using the other shop/car park.

(Icon for them, not you.)

Sysadmin crashed computer recording data from active space probe

VinceH

Re: Houston, we have a problem.

I wish they hadn't cut that scene from the final movie.

All your base are belong to us: Strava exercise app maps military sites, reveals where spies jog

VinceH

Re: Ahah!

"Unfortunately, we will inherit it only briefly, before keeling over with a Gregg's bag in our chubby hands.."

So we'll at least go out happy*, then?

* Subject to liking stuff from Greggs. Other vendors are available. Your statutory rights are not affected by this footnote.

Microsoft whips out tool so you can measure Windows 10's data-slurping creepiness

VinceH

Re: My data is mine, not yours.

"And Google's, obviously."

Sure. Unless you take steps to limit it - there are ways and means. They probably still get some data from me, but it's nowhere near as much as they could get if I just shrugged my shoulders and accepted what they do.

Look on the bright side, Pebble fans. At least your gizmo will work long enough for you to get beach body ready

VinceH

"it's now 2018 and the time and date is available everywhere."

Remind me where I can see the time in the middle of Dartmoor, the Brecon Beacons, or places like that.

TBH, I generally don't need to when I'm in such places, and don't really care what the time is - and I haven't worn a watch since the strap broke on mine - but you said it's available everywhere, when it quite patently isn't.

TalkTalk starts offering punters choice to shift-shift to O2

VinceH
Coat

Well its "core strength" certainly isn't security!

PACK YOUR BAGS! Two Trappist-1 planets have watery oceans, most likely to be inhabitable

VinceH
Alien

Re: Food chain

"More likely anything large and interesting will be hunted to extinction, if it is sentient, then they will govern it to extinction."

Quite. If we were a race capable of interstellar travel (in useful time frames), the only chance life on other worlds would probably have is if it was much more advanced than us.

Facebook invents new unit of time to measure modern attention spans: 1/705,600,000 of a sec

VinceH
Pint

Obvious joke is obvious - so obvious that I didn't see it! ;)

Actually, though, I wouldn't have Marketing Bob say it at the end; I reckon Programmer Bob should have said it when he finished his explanation.

VinceH

Thinking about this while in the shower, I've imagined a scenario that may have played out at their premises.

* cue wavy special effect to change the location from El Reg's comments page to Programmer Bob's desk...

Programmer Bob is sat at his desk, working away - or at least using his computer for something, which may or may not be work - when he decides he needs a coffee, so he gets up to head for the canteen. His route takes him past Supervisor Bob's office, where he can see Supervisor Bob deep in conversation with Marketing Bob.

He gives them a nod as he walks past, and Supervisor Bob waves at him to come in.

"Hey Programmer Bob," says Supervisor Bob, "I'm glad I caught you. I just wanted to check something. I was looking over some of your code earlier, and I noticed something, and wanted to clarify. You've defined a constant - frick - as seven hundred and five million, six hundred thousand, and used it in various places. What is it?"

"Uh, hey, yeah, we work to a precision of one one thousandth of a frame - that's a frame tick - and various frame rates. That number is the lowest common multiple; we can use it for the math* in any frame rate without resorting to complicated fractions."

"Ah, thought it was something like that."

Noticing the blank expression on Marketing Bob's face, Supervisor Bob starts to explain.

"You know that there are various different frame rates used in video?" he asks.

"Yeah," says Marketing Bob.

"And you know we work to a precision of one one thousandth of a frame?"

"Yeah," says Marketing Bob, showing early signs of not knowing at all.

Supervisor Bob nods to Programmer Bob to continue.

"Well, the math* surrounding this can be quite complicated," he explains, "and representing frames - or fractions of frames - in a number of nanoseconds can be messy and imprecise."

"Okaaaay," says Marketing Bob, nodding, while his face looks increasingly blank.

"So I figured, let's work out the lowest common multiple of all the frame rates multiplied by a thousand. That's seven hundred and five million, six hundred thousand. Define that as a constant, which I've called frick - it's short for frame tick - and we can use that throughout our code. One thousandth of each frame rate - the precision we work to - can be represented by a certain number of fricks."

"I see," says Marketing Bob, looking at Supervisor Bob in the hope he might offer a clue about what Programmer Bob just explained.

"Basically," says Supervisor Bob, trying to make things clearer and summarising what Programmer Bob said, "Programmer Bob has worked out a number that's really useful for the math* in our code. Seconds and nanoseconds aren't accurate enough, but the constant frick is a good way to represent each amount of time we need to work to."

"Aha!" says Marketing Bob, "So Programmer Bob has invented a new unit of time?"

"Well..." starts both Programmer Bob and Supervisor Bob, hesitatingly.

"That's genius!" exclaims Marketing Bob, getting up out of his chair, "I think we can do something with that. I'm off to write a press release. Can you email me an explanation - in simple terms if possible, I don't want to confuse the people we send it to."

He goes to walk out of the door, then hesitates.

"One thing, though. Can you change its name - frick sounds a bit sweary. How about a flick? That's got huge potential!"

* 'math' rather than 'maths' because all three Bobs are probably Overpuddlians.

VinceH
Facepalm

"Without flicks functions written to perform accurate conversions, the losses accumulating through timing mismatches would result in a loss of precision and could throw off the execution of the simulation."

I'd say FTFY - but in fact they probably have written those functions, specifically to handle 'flicks'.

All that's happened is that someone has discovered maths, worked out the lowest common multiple of the frame rates (x 1000), given it a name, and shouted about it as though it's some kind of miracle.

Is the writing on the wall for on-premises IT? This survey seems to say so

VinceH

Re: LOL

"One wonders who they actually interviewed for this survey, or what "enterprises" they "worked" for."

Or how loaded the questions were.

I followed the link to see if they were available, but I'd have to create an account with them so sod that.