Re: OPTIONAL
I'd upvote you for that, except for one thing: Garlic! Ugh.
Have a pint, instead.
Meanwhile: My Humbugmas lunch: https://twitter.com/VinceMH/status/415904719882563584/photo/1
3483 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Nov 2009
"I have to say that while I detest Bill Gates he actually seems to be doing some useful shit with the appalling amount of money he's made. Fair play to the guy, he's putting some back where others just choose to sit and count their dosh and do fuck all for the world."
Agreed. And for that, in the unlikely event that I ever meet the guy, I'll happily buy him a pint*.
* And he can buy all of the pints for the rest of the evening. He can afford it! ;)
"Like most here - I also use individual addresses pointed at a catch all address so I can filter out spam / monitor which companies are ignoring my "tick if you do not wish to be contacted by selected 3rd party companies"."
Ditto.
I have two domains specifically for this purpose. It is the only thing they are used for, and usually only receive email, so no individual usernames are set up on my system, other than the domain itself. In the event I want to send an email to a company using these domains, I have to manually type in the email address I am sending from.
"Quite a few years back when I first started doing this - I'd contact the company to tell them that their email list had been compromised [...] however the response was an aggressive, ignorant, buck pass saying they'd never use their mailing lists for 3rd parties, rather than figuring out who's been selling their mailing list to their mates... No good deed goes unpunished!"
Yup. Been there, done that, didn't buy the t-shirt from the spammer.
More than one such address has been compromised. In some cases, while a unique address at one of the domains is used, I know that the "company" is really just a small-fry sole trader, so the chances are their computer has been compromised.
The very first time it happened, though, it was either Experian or Equifax (I can't remember which), the address being one I'd used when I checked my own credit rating* - and when I contacted them about it, the response I got was, as yours: "not us guv, not possible, we're squeaky clean and more secure than a nun's nethers, honest to goodness."
* Always worth doing. Then you get to discover things like you have an alias that you never knew about - which I discovered on my most recent check.
"http://www.schneierfacts.com/"
Brilliant!
But it leaves me wondering... who wins out of Bruce Schneier or Chuck Norris?
(I'm not telling. Find out for yourselves!)
"But we can't help but quiver in dread if Apple and Samsung both bring devices to market that use magnetic resonance charging technology. The patent-infringement lawsuits could be depressingly tedious, indeed."
If Apple and Samsung both bring out any devices with any similarities at all the patent infringement lawsuits could be depressingly tedious.
And given the areas they operate in, that is pretty much inevitable. If they were two schoolkids squabbling, you could give them a good telling off and make them apologise and shake hands, but they'd still walk away muttering, and by tomorrow they'd be squabbling again.
"At the age this is aimed at, which is before they're toddling or crawling, they are basically a couch potato and need no training to sit or lie there. No amount of motivational words will cause them to be able to leap up and run off."
I hope it doesn't come as too much of a surprise to you that I know that for the first n months of a baby's life it can't do much else than sit or lie.
My definition of a couch potato is a little more than that. It's sitting and staring at a (TV) screen - and I'd wager that is the most commonly accepted definition of it. And in the context of this baby seat the iThing is little, if anything, more than that. There's no interaction that the child would get if presented with a suitable dangly mobile, or set of toys attached to the chair - which the parents could also use when they are interacting with the child.
I was originally going to say something like that in the footnote, but I concluded people in these parts would probably be intelligent enough to know what I meant by couch potato. Thanks for proving me wrong on that score. You wouldn't be an iFan by any chance, would you?
I don't think that's a fair comparison.
While I don't like the idea of this iSeat for babies, which to my mind is simply training the baby to become a couch potato*, I have considerably less of a problem with strapping them into a car and letting them watch a video - especially when it's only one parent in the car with them.
Better to keep the baby quiet with a video than the parent's concentration on the road ahead being reduced because he/she is also trying to deal with the child - which could lead to the death of the parent, the baby, or other people.
* The baby should be made to work in the mines!
I was amused at the point in the video where they mention that there's a "clock at your fingertips" - the model has the ring on upside down from his point of view, and is wearing a watch.
Whaddya mean, it's an advert and I'm not supposed to notice things like that, and instead just be sucked in by it?
"I got a sphero for the wife so she can use it with the cats,"
That (and dogs) was what I first thought of when I saw it.
"i'm pretty intrigued by some of the games though"
The zombie one mentioned in the article isn't the one I'd have highlighted. It's the game where you take on the role of a Rover, trying to prevent Number 6 from running away.
Except that one doesn't appear to exist. Missed a trick, there. (Or didn't miss it, but balked at the licensing fees needed, which would probably be understandable.)
"The headline promised dead puppies. Or at least one, threatened, or bumped off by a heartless corporation."
What we need is for someone to do the decent thing...
...and make a spoof Andrex advert, in which said Puppy is bounding around, and follows an unraveled loo-roll back to its source. That source, of course, is the roll on the wall next to the loo.
The puppy jumps up onto the seat to get at the roll but, being a cute ickle puppy-wuppy who can't actually see over the rim, doesn't realise there's a big hole there designed for human arses to hang above, and it falls into the loo, where it then drowns.
If the flush can be pulled while the puppy drowns, without it being utterly implausible, bonus points are available.
Note: No cute ickle puppy-wuppies must be harmed in the making of this spoof advert.
"...despite having worked on the internet since the 90s...
Well, hurry up and finish it please!"
I thought it was finished - at least, the web, anyway. I've already read the whole thing twice.
Although I did notice that when I read it the second time, some things had changed.
Although I hate to defend FaecesBook, this problem is not limited to - and did not start - there. The same people that 'share' this crap on FaecesBook, if they didn't have that site, would share it by emailing it out to every single one of the people in their email contacts.
And some people do both - sharing it via FaecesBook if that's where they received/saw it, and by email if that's where they received/saw it. And no doubt by other means, as well.
"Oh, that's fixable. Apple can just do like Google likes to do, and link the bluetooth service to some other service."
Well, I have Android 4.1.2 on my phone, and Bluetooth is definitely switched off. If it's linked to another service, then that must be a service I don't use.
"Like, say, that you can not have wifi enabled without also having bluetooth enabled. Or do like Microsoft likes to do, and simply remove the setting to turn off bluetooth. The possibilities to make sure that you see those offers are endless."
No, those are possibilities to discourage me from buying a new phone. :p
(Or, if I buy one and then discover I can't disable Bluetooth, to return it for a full refund because it is unsatisfactory.)
"... and if the shop itself were to start spamming me I would be out of there so fast ..."
Quite.
I, for one, sincerely hope Apple have patented this idea so tightly that it isn't possible for any other company to work their way around the patents to implement something similar.
However, if they haven't done, and other companies do manage to come up with something that works for other types of phone, then I can rest easy: I've always kept Bluetooth switched off unless I'm actually using it for something - which I haven't done in many years.
"A few of the websites saying to upgrade the browser are classing IE11 as IE7 or at least that's what the websites are saying I should upgrade from."
Just a bit of wild speculation, but I wonder... would you be using Windows 8 by any chance? IIRC, Windows 7 is actually version 6.1.something - so is Windows 8 version 7.something? (I assume, without checking, that it does have a new major version number). If so, could it be that IE11 is dishing out the Windows version number instead of its own?
"And that said, history is written by the winners - we only percieve the Empire as the evil ones because the Rebels won at the end. this whole "Dark Lord of the Sith" stuff could be entirely propagander by Ackbar's PR department (much like Microsofts anti-Google marketing tactic at the moment)"
Well I was going to point out that a series of documentaries was made about the whole affair, which included actual footage of many key events, such as the Death Star destroying Alderaan.
Then I remembered that some of that footage was 'corrected' in later editions of the documentaries, so maybe you're right.
"I doubt that the financial institutions will "facilitate" transfer of the chip coding to a multi vendor card arrangement."
Indeed.
What I suspected was that users of the card will submit their existing card details to Amazon. Before using the card, they'd log into their account, and specify which real card to use to make the next payment, and then toddle off to use their card. As far as any given vendor is concerned, will simply be a card issued by Amazon - which is who they'll receive payment from (?) - and behind the scenes, Amazon would debit the pre-selected card in order to fund that payment.
However, the article (and patent application based on a skim reading) does actually describe a programmable card. Perhaps a similar concept, but with the card storing the choice of account: Vendor is still simply seeing a card from Amazon, and receiving payment from them, but the details of where the payment comes from to get to Amazon is stored on the card itself, rather than on their server.
I'm not sure how Amazon will get any benefit (read: money) out of this. The (real) card issuers aren't going to want to give Amazon a cut. The end users won't want to pay extra on top of whatever they're buying (well, I wouldn't, anyway). And the vendors won't want to give up any of their sales value on top of what they already have to pay to accept cards, just because Joe Bloggs wants to pay by Amazon.
"Poster above points out that the drone still isn't going to know when you're in."
As I pointed out in a comment on the earlier article, IF this delivery scheme were to actually happen, the chances are the drone delivery option would be exactly that: an option, on items suitable for delivery that way.
When a customer is ordering something, if delivery by drone is possible for that item, they will be able to opt for it - and would only do so if they aren't going out in the next however-many minutes; the estimated delivery time for delivery by drone, plus a little extra just to be sure. The drone would know the customer is in precisely because the customer opted for delivery by drone - which they wouldn't have done if they weren't going to be in.
"Why don'y THEY do THEIR job and get this sorted out so that Amazon (and all the others) CAN'T avoid paying the tax they should be due."
But Dave Cameron and Claire Perry have been doing their job to get this sorted out. Once the filter is up and running, all it'll need is a bit of feature creep, and instead of "MPs back call to boycott low-taxed tat from Amazon" the headline could be "MPs back call to enforced boycott on low-taxed tat from Amazon".
"For a 30 minute delivery you're expecting this is great but would you really want it dropping your packages on your lawn while you're not there?"
I suspect it'll be a case of being able to opt for this delivery method on orders for which it is possible, rather than a more generic delivery method - so that scenario won't happen: You'd only opt for it if you are going to be there.
" I suppose one could chase a drone down with an R/C aircraft and force them down as well."
For added lulz, your R/C aircraft would need to be able to play a recorded (or relayed) message at the Drone. "You are flying over a restricted airspace..."
Okay, so the message won't actually be heard by anyone, but who cares? It'll be fun.
Icon: It flies.
You know that. I know that. Typical readers of El Reg know that.
But many people don't. Many people don't even know what one is, even AFTER it's been installed on their computer as part of the process of installing something else because they didn't see/understand the pre-ticked box, and the toolbar has, as a result, appeared at their browser.
All they know is "all the extra buttons just appeared" at some point - often more than one lot at different times - making the browser window smaller, and now they've noticed the computer's a bit slow accessing the web.
The oldest computer I definitely still have is my Acorn A3000.
I may still have my first laptop, the make of which I can't remember - it ran DOS, booted from floppy, and had a very small (3 or 4 x 80?) display.
But all the 8-bit classics - a Beeb, an Electron, a Memotech, a ZX81, etc. - all long since binned. (Before people started paying silly money for them on eBay.)
The ones that didn't appear in the documentary "Black Sheep" ?