The master plan...
We're not trying to build a monopoly, oh no... buy a Nexus and go back to bitching about Microsoft and the browser wars...
1913 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Oct 2009
"The vast majority of internet users have voted. Mostly by not changing their default search engine..."
Nooo, most people just go with the default, not realising what it entails. As Microsoft before them with IE, so Google should be forced to alert people that there are alternate search engines on first use of search, provide information on the ramifications of each possibility and allow a choice.
But no. Especially while we have so many people in the tech sphere who are so mired in the past (ie: the browser wars) and still have a chip on their shoulders toward Microsoft that they cannot see what has happened with Google - or choose not to.
You mean the next proprietary operating system from the next would-be monopoly?
Pot, kettle...
Adverts... yeah, they're irritating. But this has the potential to be way more sinister...
This will only serve to increase the already huge pool of data Google collects on everyone whenever possible for behavioral analysis... so instead of the blatent, in-your-face pesky bits of irritation that we all know and loathe, I would expect something a lot more subtle - your VR world slowly being adapted and morphed to influence you into buying.
The world according to Google... <shudder> hell awaits...
More likely because people are waking up to the fact that Alphabet/Google has become more evil and far-reaching than Microsoft ever was - websearch, email, mobile devices, spy-glasses (binned, thankfully), and with self-driving cars to track your movements, their own fibre network (to better track your web activity) and balloon based connectivity (with traffic tracking and spy cameras? I wouldn't put it past them, given their previous record for sly wifi slurping) in the pipeline.
So there is a gap in the market, created when Google abandoned all pretenses of doing no evil, for someone to stand up for the users - and Microsoft are desperate for it to be them.
Too bad that their prior reputation still haunts them (I guess even after 20 years, there are still those mired in the past)... and the current Win-10 telemetry issue is not their cause...
Not acting like the Microsoft of 20 years ago would probably help a lot, too...
"We’ve worked with Google to reboot the UI,” HTC says...
... its excellent Gallery app, with funky thumbnail video previews, has been retired in favour of Google’s Photos. Google has grabbed the design in other ways, forcefully injecting a Google search bar into the Recent Apps / Task Switcher
If that's what's easily visible to the end user, I dread to imagine how much big-brother nastiness Google have "forcefully injected" under the hood.
Well, they just added Xbox One support, so the signs are positive...
We're staying in.
It'll probably be by a very narrow margin, and there will almost certainly be some dubious loss or finding of postal votes and ballot boxes, but we'll stay in.
Either that or it'll be like Ireland - repeated ballots until they get the result they want.
... what all the Google faithful on here who are so quick to mock Microsoft have to say about this?
... maybe a trot-out of the usual years out of date links, perhaps? It's been a while since we've seen them...
... but not on iOS unless you have a huge discovery/UA budget...
To be fair, I have had to reinstall Windows a few times when things when horribly wrong - but that was back in the dark days of XP, never had that problem since Win7.
But these days, with Android and Google, I can't help but get the feeling of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
So the first result for "Windows 10 mobile is"... comes out with "dead" - on Google. Funnily enough, on Duck Duck Go, I just get "... iso" and "... issues". But it's not like Google would ever bias their search results to harm a competitor, right?
That said, I kind of hope that it does get pulled, for the sole purpose of shutting up the commentards on here whose sole purpose seems to be trolling for anything Windows Phone related... makes me wonder what their motivation is...
"... and teach it frustration and boredom"
Well, I guess it's more inventive than a herring sandwich...
... that it's both Microsoft and Google.
Had it been just the former, I would have expected an outpouring of bile from the usual suspects about how Microsoft abuse every single patent and law possible, whereas in the latter's case I would expect a stream of comments about the impossibility of Google's guilt and how the plaintiffs must be overreacting...
I guess there are a few cases of exploding head syndrome going on right now...
"Things are beginning to look just a little unsafe for the common folk."
If telemetry and tracking for the common folk is your worry, then things have been pretty unsafe for over a decade.
Given that you* trot out the exact same "joke" every time there's a Windows Phone related article, I would wager that even a Firefox OS developer would earn a better living that you would as a stand-up comedian.
* I'm guessing that this is the same person posting as an AC every time. I don't hold much hope for humanity if it's actually two or more people who are this banal...
"Throughout last year, Microsoft Windows represented the most targeted operating system platform, with 42 per cent of the top 20 discovered exploits directed at Microsoft platforms and applications."
Really? I hadn't realised that Microsoft's mobile offering had gained such traction as to be worth targeting, never mind being the most targeted...
Make the hardware providers responsible for handing out the updates, wait until they all get so out of sync that it causes huge issues and growing unrest among the end users, then sweep in with a cry of "we'll take over updates! Everything will be in sync!" and presto! You're seen as the heroes who sorted everything out, as opposed to the evil, scheming megalomaniacs who will not rest until they have total control over everyone's devices and data...
... I'll get me coat.
zero security issues to date
To be fair, security by obscurity is no security at all - if the platform gained more traction, it would be more heavily targeted.
But at the moment, why make the effort when smartphone OS with the biggest market share (by a long way) is also the easiest to break into?
"Put the onus back on Google."
So basically, you're proposing to have one single giant corporate entity responsible for updating and maintaining the OS across a suite of devices from various hardware manufacturers?
... because that's oh-so-popular with Microsoft, Windows and PCs, isn't it?