Re: Destroy another nation state's satellite?
Operated not by the NSA but the NRO which only recently de-cloaked. They have a very interesting web site...
952 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Oct 2009
Fixed it for you:
NHS have brushed problems under the carpet for many years and the entire set of leaders are not fit for purpose. They make everything overly complicated, refuse to change and that's how they end up with multiple agency providers. They willingly sign up for this mess for the money.
Well assuming your not joking.
By definition, if you can see something, then the light you are seeing has reached you. Things will appear as if they did when they emitted the light. That is, as far as your concerned, some time in the past, as the light has taken time to reach your eyes, as light travels at a speed, it is not instantaneous. The longer the light took to reach your eyes, the further back in time they will seem.
Since it takes time for light to reach your eyes from an object, then that equates to some distance, as light propagate at a speed. Objects further away will be appear as they did before objects that are closer, as it has taken longer for the light to reach your eyes.
Light travels at a sort of set speed. So, given a few assumptions you can take a guess at how long in the past the light started its journey to your eyes, and therefore how far away an object might be. It's almost as if there is a close relationship between space and time, with the speed of light as a determinant.
So how did you get in front of the light? You didn't. You are always here and the object is always there. When the light left the object, your relationship to it meant that a finite time would pass before the light would reach your eyes. Indeed, light leaving you would also take the same finite time to reach back to the object. When the light left the object you were older by the same amount of time that the light takes to propagate to you. From your perspective anyway, others may have differing opinions.
Now, I guess you thinking something along the lines of, well I didn't exist x billions of years ago. Well that doesn't matter. The bit of space time that you occupy now did. It's relationship to the object then was such that it has taken x billion years for light to propagate from the object to your eyes which just happen to occupy it in your now.
That's one way of thinking about it anyway.
https://www.apple.com/uk/shop/product/MQLU3ZM/A/usb-c-to-apple-pencil-adapter?fnode=72809a32b7a2b6eeddbd50ed6007105bc1effd0acdf4c7f77b36ecb5695a0d6f96591e830ba986ac4ed30d94b8ee288df487112b44b462f4b59ce5284ce866f6262bdd39f8bf6d26f428c4d7d9e86637ee0e8ec94dfd6648ef4d3da714aaf908
Was about the make the same comment.
In my world, flight attendants are normally female, well look that way anyway. Builders constructing the hundreds of boxlike houses on the fields around the village, are, to my eyes, all men. So, what exactly is the problem with the software reflecting the world as it appears to be?
Hum, Modula 2 was Pascal done proper. Real I/O and the ability to pass functions (and other stuff) as arguments, plus a whole load of cleaning up of the syntax. One of my favorite languages. What do we (almost) all use now, Oh, yes, pathetic Java script and PHP; the twins from hell. Now there's progress...