Re: EMACS
However, I think it can emulate Vi.
1167 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Oct 2009
Around then I was contracting for BT City Business Products, writing code to copy data from a single Reuters feed to multiple terminals across a trading floor.
As it was in C and used sockets I wouldn't be surprised if it was still in use today, in some form.
I always wondered if it was strictly legal, copyright-wise.....
That's very interesting, so I wonder what the engineering problems are? Is it a problem with the reservoir they are injecting into, the pumping, "pressure management" (whatever that is?)
What I'm getting at is, can it ever be made to work (if you had a better reservoir/better engineering/etc?) Can it be made to work "better" (they had some limited success)? Or, is it fundamentally a flawed concept?
We need more details, the newspaper article is a good starting point.
Yes I think someone forgot a few powers of 10?
In any case I'd like to see a Carbon Capture plant actually up and running, to prove or disprove the engineering.
Could we not run (say) a gas turbine into a CO2 purifier, and then pump the resultant captured CO2 into a depleted gas field under the North Sea?
It would be interesting to measure all the extra inefficiencies this imposes, in real life, not just a design, and also monitor the CO2 deposit for leaks etc.
If it proves to be feasible, it would be an extra string to our bow.
I totally agree with Dr Syntax.
If you also gasify the wood byproducts it's win-win. So, for example, convert Drax into a massive charcoal oven, and use the gas byproducts to drive turbines.
Then you get both electricity generation, and also create fixed carbon in the form of charcoal.
The next challenge is to bury it somewhere, I favour compressing it into pellets that are denser than water, and dumping it in the ocean, above a deep trench. It literally sinks - a carbon sink (geddit???!??) It'll remain there inert for ever.
But, you could also put it into landfill as activated charcoal, which has another win of trapping pollutants that might otherwise leach out. Or, bury it in opencast mines, which then get landscaped.
Another idea I had was to farm kelp at sea, and create charcoal from that, and then dump it.
One line so far, see https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0435-1
"The transition frequency at a field of 1.033 tesla was determined to be 2,466,051.7 ± 0.12 gigahertz (1σ uncertainty) and agrees with the prediction for hydrogen to a precision of 5 × 10−8."
What if we are looking at distant galaxies with normal spectra, but they are entirely antimatter? How could we tell the difference? If the matter and antimatter separated out in the early universe, then maybe there is the same of each, just isolated into galaxy or galaxy cluster clumps.
I'd like to see the old binaries hang around for longer, and not get deleted.
I'm very much an "if it ain't broke don't fix it type", so when I install a linux, I get a bunch of packages to go with it, and turn off updates, unless there is instability straight away.
However, sometime later I might want to install a program I forgot earlier. It would be better if the packages were still around so I could pick up these binaries. After all, they don't need "maintaining".
This also applied to embedded linux projects, where we fix on a certain version and don't update in the field.
If the kernel is dead in 2 years that's barely enough time for all the apps to have been built to go with it (if there are install dependencies, which there usually are.)
Absolutely. The bean counters decided it should be implemented to this quality.
So, the liability rests with them, it's a simple equation.
I'm thinking a class action against NATS would be appropriate here, because the airlines are shrugging off liability (and, who can blame them?)
Those of you with smart metering - why can't we have a tariff that follows the wholesale price?
For those who want a green tariff - they also get cut off - or have a minimal allowance overnight when the wind isn't' blowing?
(Or - the price goes right up?)
The disconnect (sic) is that we don't have consumer pricing related to the peaks and troughs. If we did so, we could have:
- Smart plugs that turn on an appliance when the energy price is low, e.g. a washing machine.
- Car charging that only charges when the energy price is low (for infrequent car users).
All this technology is do-able now, we have the electronics and simple computers to implement it.
If we adjusted consumer demand in this way it would relieve a lot of the problems caused by a flat rate maintained for months on end.
This is giving me an idea.
Us dev peeps need to look stuff up on the internet, so how about a "dual-head" machine (in one box of course) where the "surfing" internet connection is serviced by a "locked down" CPU with security, virus-checking etc, and the dev CPU(s) are air-gapped/highly firewalled, but both display on the same display(s).
You mouse over between windows and can type into either.
The only way of copying data from one domain to the other, locally, could be the clipboard/cut-n-paste.
Dev machines generally need to be networked for code-control, teamwork, tools licences etc, but that could/should be on a separate physical firewalled network.
True, the _majority_ of the CO2 in the atmosphere is natural, what we're concerned about is the "topping up" of that by anthropogenic burning of ("natural") fossil fuels.
In any case, much more carbon is locked up around the world in carbonate sedimentary rocks. Maybe we could encourage more of that to happen, in the oceans, to permanently lock the stuff up. Combine feldspar with CO2 in industrial quantities and dump the limestone formed.
Hasn't it always been like that?
Kelvin formulated the second Law of Thermodynamics IN 1851, during the pursuit of more efficient steam engines, which was driven by market forces. Theoretical physics (of its day), from market finance.
It's only in the WWII years and soon after that science research was funded by government (military technology being the main driver).