Gadgets are only good
If she lets you play with her as she plays with the gadgets
521 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Sep 2009
I wasn't sure whether you were for or against, but the comment shows they were a small number of custom developed aircraft, for which maintenance costs would be huge.
I'm surprised they didn't simply use an Airbus or similar. Someone has mentioned that they're built near tolerance limits, but this is a fallacy; they're built to hold several hundred people and their luggage, so carrying a small crew of 10 and some electronics (even several tons of electronics) will probably be a weight reduction. You wouldn't even have to put a glass cockpit and redesigned engines and wings on them, because the ones they come with would be perfectly adequate, and Line Replacable Units would be available for the most part in any BA/Virgin service depot if really needed.
Paris, because getting her going is almost as expensive as a Nimrod.
What's the airspeed velocity of an unladen pterodactyl?
Just to anticipate those of you who are going to ask African or European you'll get thrown off the bridge because the possibilities are:
Triassic: Pangean
Jurassic: Laurasian or Gondwanan
Cretaceous: African (Europe was mostly underwater)
The Chinese maintain a much larger army for a much lower cost than the UK, US or any other developed nation, primarily due to the fact that the average wage can be much lower.
Lewis does seem to have missed the point that it is believed that the current engines on their jet are only temporary until they can produce a stealthy, vectored thrust unit (with a greater power output), which is when the advantages against the US are going to significantly narrow.
The plane itself is bigger than its rivals, meaning it has provision for more fuel and weapons capacity, so when it is out of the prototype stage, I expect that the US and UK defence analysts will stop laughing at it then
Copper does rust, at any rate it oxidizes which is how you get rust from iron (rust is iron oxide). The main difference is that copper oxides protect the underlying real copper whereas surface rust does not significantly protect any underlying iron.
Copper is also vulnerable to being 'eroded' by thievery...
The Kinect links to the XBox through a USB port, like any other peripheral; its virtually impossible for it to be responsible for XBox failures. Given the huge number of Kinects sold and plugged in, its far more likely that the XBoxes have demonstrated their ongoing bad build quality and failure rate by crapping out at around the time the new toy was coincidentally added.
You may have some misconceptions of Sweden. Apart from the fact that they started off exporting Vikings, which was an extremely effective combat weapon for about 1000 years, they have continued with production of effective weapons to the present day
A certain Alfred Nobel was Swedish (inventor of Gelignite and Dynamite, plus other explosives - he came up with the Peace prize for the lulz), Sweden has Bofors (famous for rapid firing cannon), Husqvarna (not just outdoor tools) and Saab aircraft, including the Gripen, a reasonable competitor to most modern multirole combat aircraft. Then there is the Visby stealth corvette....
There are more but that will be doing to get on with.
After the tremendous success of PARIS, I suggest The Register aim for something more ambitious this time, and construct the UKs first privately built Aircraft Carrier.
With the expert knowledge of Lewis Page, and the thousands, nay millions of technical suggestions from El Reg readers, I venture to suggest that we're unlikely to do any worse than the British Government is doing now.
That the Motorola Defy would be a good starting point. (Short term waterproof, strong glass etc....) and Motorola is a US(ish) company
Whether the phones get regularly broken is probably not a major issue, provided replacements are readily available.
Its perhaps about time the Army moved from horrendous expense developing unbreakable bits of kit that are obsolete by the time they get to the soldier, to accepting that things break and go for cheap with lots of spares.
In Gallipoli, the allied forces lost ships to mines, not guns, the Germans won the 1917 Moonzund encounter against coastal artillery (and Russian vessels). Normandy landing relied on a huge naval bombardment (granted with air support). I'm not sure what you're trying to imply with Kerch as it was heavy losses to both sides. Toulon had its coastal artillery taken out by naval bombardment.
Its actually a trade off. Coastal artillery has to hit a moving target, whilst the naval artillery has stabilisation issues against a static target. Most of the latter are handled perfectly adequately by computers nowadays....
All the users are effectively demanding their own personal lorry to their home, and so the ISPs should be charging the users an appropriate level to meet their demands. Unless the user makes a request to Google, Youtube et al, there would be no traffic on the road.
Google and many other major providers already have their own network for their personal heavy lorries and they pay for it accordingly, so its not realistic to ask them to pay for providing what the user of that ISP has requested they deliver
Access to finance is not a valid reason to deny bail; for example, Archer had truckloads of finance and was granted bail, ditto Nasir currently. Similarly Assange cannot be regarded as posing a significant risk of tampering with witnesses (its difficult to tamper with witnesses in Sweden when you're in London). All in all I'm a bit surprised by the refusal to grant bail given that there is a presumption in favour of it.
Maybe a real lawyer can clarify if he thought the DJ was right or not....
Would be extremely mouldy and stink to high heaven by the time the case got to court.
It was a clear duty of the police officers to remove material which may contaminate the actual evidence i.e the pizza boxes, and the best way of doing that was nom nom nom.....
Paris, because she's an expert at eating out...
Essex University MUD (Multi User Dungeon) would like a word with you....
...I bought other peoples computer time to play this and performed my coursework on a BBC Micro. Probably explains why I got a 3rd....
Incidentally I went for interview to Manchester University and they were playing a 3d maze tank game on a network there in 1981 on a University Open Day in their Computing Science department
Was too buggy at the time to play, and most of the missions seemed to be launch missiles in the general direction of the enemy and pray they got a lock on a target before the incoming ones sank you.
M1A1 Tank Platoon and Gunship were quite good though, even though experience with some of the weaknesses resulted in easy victories.
I'd still kill for a really good WW2 sub game; every single one seemed to be too flawed to use....
The thing is that this domain, if properly set up, would be top (or close to it) of the heap on any Google search for sex related material or products. As a huge proportion of internet searches are for such items, the value of this domain should theoretically be immense. I am surprised that it has not been converted to a huge money opportunity, as the range of activities that could be hung off it cover everything from porn to toys,magazines etc to dating.
If said trucker admits the actual act to any "officer of the court" which means solicitor, barrister or anyone else, then the barrister is obliged to disclose those facts.
Its the barristers job to present the information he has been provided in the best possible light i.e translate the "they wuz asking for it" bit into "its all their fault and my client is blameless for doing what needed to be done"
Now watch every accountant in the country either employ a solicitor and route advice through that solicitor so that it is legally privileged information. Alternatively watch accountants perform the minimum training required so that their advice can be regarded as "legal" advice rather than financial advice.
..accountants are past masters at finding ways to get the laws to do what they want, so the fact even I can see that you can drive a truck through the loopholes in this ruling implies its not a very good one....
Normally El Reg articles are subjected to a lot of analysis, some critical, but mostly reasoned in the comments.
However on this subject, it seems that a lot of El Reg readers respond in the same knee jerk way as a Jeremy Kyle audience/mob when "those all important DNA tests" are revealed; they leave their brains and critical faculties at the door.
Never in the field of human history has the downvote button been subjected to so much misuse.....