£3,500
I'm betting this is the cost for a PC configured with the software that $CivilServant needs to get on with their job, not simply the cost of a PC in a similar state to that of one you would order from Dell or pick up in Tesco
521 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Sep 2009
Strap on some thrusters and send it on its way to a Mars orbit.
I grant it may take a few years to get there and as a result of its travel may need some repairs by the first crew to arrive.
However, by the time we have the technology to get there, at least we'd have a basic space station to dock at prior to descent to the surface.
Mass killing of the unemployed.
I thought that was often the whole point of 19th century armies; put your surplus odds and sods in the army/ navy and send them off to fight a foreign war, and reward the (very) few who came back, preferably using your newly conquered territory as the reward.
Hmm, sounds like a plan; if we could get all the unemployed youth and over 60s into the Territorial Army and send them to Afghanistan maybe we would be on to something here...
Whilst an argument can be made that the guy should pay for the cost of fixing any damage he caused to systems, the cost of "putting things completely right" is something that should be born by the organisation.
Its a cost they should have incurred before the incident, and should be incurring on an ongoing basis in any event; NASA is a organisation which has information of economic and military value and its only reasonable to expect the information on its systems to be kept secure.
I'd suspect a charge of about $20,000 would be much more appropriate to conduct an audit of the affected systems and repair any damage caused. $200k is one nought too many and the US claim is two zeros too many.
Yes, but for example, he would have needed a warrant to search News International and get all their emails etc., and at the time I doubt he had enough evidence to show reasonable cause to search and disrupt such a large politically charged target.
Quite honestly, I suspect he had better things to do than have half the Met wading through emails. Like keeping policemen on the street reducing violent crime maybe
All CEOs get caught saying some strange things, but I would suspect that Page and Brin are less versed where politics and business merge. That was one of the reasons why Schmidt was appointed in the first place; its a given that, despite his Novell/ Apple history, he is less versed in the technology and probably is not a visionary like Page and Brin, but I'm sure his real world experience is invaluable.
You've indirectly stated the problem with human rights issues. It's how 100% of the population get treated that matters. The 1% who legitimately protest are the people who need protecting.
In any event if 99% of the people are happy with a government, then it should have no problems facing a challenge in free and fair elections, should it?
That's not to say the so called 'Free and Democratic' west does not have its issues.
Actually China has made giant strides and certainly has improved its treatment of individuals on the back of its material gains, and I agree that is not recognised enough, but that is not to say that the world outside should not continually push for more improvement.
Having said how awful MySpace is currently, a good argument could be made for using it as a baseline to create a genuine rival to Facebook.
FaceBook obviously has issues and if MySpace converted itself into something with respect for the issues which Facebook fails on, then it could have a market space for itself.
I've had one on my desk for the last month or so and can add my own observations
a) The screen is the mutts nuts. I resent going back to my 1080p PC after using this.
b) about once a week it doesn't seem to wake up from sleep
c) I occasionally get a stray/ accidental mouse click registering - not sure which.
d) the batteries in the mouse last about a month-6 weeks (with Duracell)
e) why do I feel slightly dirty when I'm stroking the mouse to get a scroll action?
f) 1600 quid?? damn
Hmm, the ruling goes into a lot of detail and it seems the judge has achieved a good understanding of the issues involved. I'm a little unclear on why Nokia didn't try to invalidate the patent on mathematical grounds, as I'm sure that the patent can be expressed entirely as a mathematical formula.
There is perhaps one other issue though - i would suspect that the base-station itself determines whether network availability is by ballot or by group, and therefore an individual phone cannot be held to infringe the patent, only the base station itself; the phone only responds to the information from the base station.
I think for the next 5 or so years, a device without DVD playback is seriously crippled. Blu-Ray is still a niche market and I don't think it will become mainstream before non-physical (digital) media takes over, but DVD is ubiquitous. For the Wii-U it to be an entertainment centre it should accomodate our existing media whilst we transfer to the new.
For prior art, you have to show that it was commonly performed before the patent filing date, not today.
Not only that, you have to read the claims very carefully to see if
a) you do actually perform what is described in the claims or not : if you don't you are in the clear anyway
b) if you do perform exactly what is in the claims, you have to see if you can find some prior art which performs exactly what is in the claims, and then gum up the system by filing a reexamination request
...are hardware patents and actually worthy of a patent.
For this reason, I suspect most Google handset makers will already have a license to use Nokia's technology , and are thus already contributing to Nokia's abysmal bottom line. Apple was just a holdout.
I never know why the Register or anyone else quotes Florian Mueller; his prediction rate and analysis are abysmal.
speaking from (unfortunately) personal experience, where I managed to avoid this fate only by finding a UK Supreme Court decision that specifically covered my situation. I was able to point that getting round the case I referred to would cost far more in legal fees than they might recover, and that they therefore should accept the settlement offer I put forward.
You may be able to keep your home by sorting out some form of repayment agreement or other maneuver, but only if the creditors believe they'll recover more money this way.
EF2K and F16 are surprisingly similar in the speed stakes, and getting out of the exchange is easier said than done, as doing it wrong presents your hot exhaust as a prime target for a IR missile in the ass. If you don't want to play the best time to get out would probably be on initial flypast when both aircraft are heading at high speed in opposite directions.
F16 can has AMRAAMs too. Not sure if it can deploy Phoenix, which I seem to recall is a big missile.
I think the principle is to go to full afterburner and head into dogfighting fast if long range missile launches are detected/ suspected.
F16s don't have a big RCS, but the Eurofighter is much better, so I would suspect the EF has a better chance of surviving a medium/ long range missile exchange.
Yep, its quite common in teaching scenarios for the pupils to be placed in the worst position possible so they learn the best way out of it.
However I do hope its not the case that the RAF is so short of money that it can't train the UK pilots properly or ensure they put in enough flying hours. If that is the case, I suggest they buy a block of F16s or F18s to play with and keep the serious machines for wartime.
The Force is not strong in this one...
As a massive WWII buff, you haven't been looking very hard; many ships were covered in dazzle camoflage, from a few simple stripes to break up the Bismarck and Tirpitz (which may have been painted in and out depending on service conditions) to complex patterns on US and other vessels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage