What about bags of flour?
Do you think that if they knew how explosive flour is (when mixed with air) they'd require some kind of explosives licence for purchase?
67 publicly visible posts • joined 14 May 2007
Bought a 50pk of disposable plastic knives the other day on the self-service till. Had to wait for someone to come over to authorise my purchase.
I pointed out how daft this was, as they were only plastic knives and can barely cut room temperature butter. But, was told, "we don't make the rules".
I then pointed out that I could quite easily buy a pen/pencil or even screwdrivers without needing authorisation, and stab someone with them.
I reckon that the funny look I then got was down to how quickly I was able to think about methods of stabbing people using common household items. Hey, I'm resourceful like that.
#You sheltered me from harm, kept me warm, kept me warm
You gave my life to me, set me free, set me free
The finest years I ever knew, were all the years I had with you
I would give *anything I own, give up my life, my heart, my home
I would give *anything I own, just to have you back again#
For the purpose of the Jury, *'anything' (everything) means 'excluding photos on my laptop'.
Ok, so these are two pretty smart active noise-cancelling headphones. But, don't discount the abilities of the passive noise-cancelling ones.
I can personally vouch for the Etymotic ER4p's. Ok, so they are inner-ear type, and you have to use the little foam earpiece to get the most noise cancelling effect. But, with them in place, and your music turned *off* you can barely hear a sound. It's like wearing earplugs. Of course, this means that your personal choice of music is almost entirely isolated from the external noises. And, because of their passive nature, no batteries are needed.
If you try to use hotmail.com and your O/S of choice is Ubuntu, and your browser of choice is Firefox, then hotmail is entirely broken!!
You can browse/read your email. But, you cannot 'click' in the message area for newmails.
Apparently, if you 'fake' your useragent as IE it works fine. Go figure.
I like TGS, but, it also winds me right up.
The moment I hear, "so we tested it to destruction", I turn over. I've never yet had something broken because I *accidentally* tied it to the back of quad-bike, and drove around the volcanic beaches of Iceland. So, I'm not sure why testing products like that is relevant.
ditto blowing up gadgets that claim to be 'rugged'.
Also, their test criteria is sadly lacking.
eg. last Monday's net-enabled stereos. No mention made of why they dumped certain brands for "not looking cool enough" (my Radiostation was one - which is amazing, btw, although I have the iPod enabled version). Jason made reference to how important the sound quality was, and then tested different tunes, with no reference to whether they were DAB/streamed/etc, or what the bitrate was. Needless to say, my list of gripes goes on. Yet, I still watch.
Don't get me started on when they test 'mountain bikes' (or anything remotely cycle-related). As a keen MTB'er I find those episodes the hardest of all to watch.
And, for the love of all things good and great, stop giving away all your fecking prizes in one big hit. Ok, so it means that some lucky fecker is a *real* lucky fecker. But, why not just make it one per person? Like some kind of lucky-dip?
Mind you, that Suzi Perry... She's a year older than me, and yet I still would.
I remember when the pavement was for pedestrians (try walking along them now, with the amount of cars parked with 2 wheels up on it), the road was for driving long (now the cars barely move), a telephone was considered 'mobile' if it wasn't bolted to the wall and the cord was a couple of feet long, and a personal stereo was *personal*.
But, I am starting to get on a bit now.
I blame the safety brigade. Cars need to be made more dangerous, not safer.
Start with: no seat belts, and a 6in spike in the middle of the steering wheel.
Then, spikes over the bumpers.
That would make people pay more attention.
Trouble is, it's not that easy.
The moment you do that, the profile page tells you your address/postcode is no longer valid. And then there's the phone number.
My profile is linked to my 360/Live account, I can't just muck around with my settings/region and fake my address just to test some beta software!!
We must ban water. It's about time. It's also the cause of so many drowning related deaths. And, what if these terrorists start building super power, long-range water pistols, and start targeting planes with them? And we thought laser pointers were bad!?
Think of the children.
Mind you, they did look like a bunch of students. Throw in a few bars of soap, and you've solved a separate problem. So, I suppose it wasn't all bad.
Doesn't ground effect kick in under a certain height? Or does that only apply to winged craft?
I'd like to see a test flight of over 50m in altitude. Until then all those rockets throughout the galaxy will have to remain unassembled*.
* a very thinly veiled reference to 'Jet Pac' on the ZX Spectrum. Just in case you didn't get it.
Oh, I'm with you on that!! I've never dream of buying anything from Game. Far too uncompetitive.
But, for every one of us shrewd 'net bargain hunters, there's 10 (or more) suckers prepared to pay high-street retail prices (which are generally full RRP).
Even if the next 5yrs brings a growth of game downloads/streaming/etc (via the 'net), this will be the exception, and not the norm. eg. with Blu-Ray content being 10-50GB (in theory), I don't want to be downloading 50GB!!
So, there's definately some money to still me made in this area (high-street sales).
About 4yrs ago I bought at 33p. It was early December, and they'd announced a profit-warning. I thought this was crazy, as Christmas sales wouldn't be for another 2 weeks.
I knew from my retail background that things would pickup in the week before Christmas, I was even in their stores after their warning, and knew trading was 'brisk'.
Sold a year, or so, later at 73p. Was a happy bunny!!
Mind, you, if I still had them..... currently @ 250p.
Only a month ago, they were 170-180p. Didn't think they were worth a punt at the time, as I didn't foresee them going over 190-195p.
Which is why I work for a living, and don't get rich quick on the stock market!!
Wasn't the initial (military) idea behind network design/protocols/routing that the network (as a whole) would survive in the event of direct nuclear attacks on a routing node? I seem to remember DARPA being involved at some point. Someone remind me.
So, given there hasn't been a catastrophic nuclear attack on the VM network, is it safe to assume that it doesn't handle routing failure well?
Don't get me started on Virgin Media.
Worse thing I ever did was sign up with ADSL from Virgin Media.
Best thing I ever did was pay the £50 "exit fee" to leave and find a decent ISP.
Yet again, VM prove they are all about *cable* broadband users.
What about us poor sods on their shockingly bad ADSL service?
What of the recent traffic prioritisation work (about 2 weeks ago) that meant all streaming/video/VoIP/gaming data was treated as P2P, and throttled right back - which, due to the time-sensitive nature of gaming packets, meant that gaming was broken? And, when it wasn't broken, latency was 220-280ms!?!?
Just have a look at:
http://bazza.dyndns.org/rrdstats/baz14all.cgi?p=1y
And you'll see the poor latency for yourself.
Actually, see if you can guess the month when I moved onto their ADSL service?!
But, what do I care? Branson can stick his ADSL broadband service up his jacksy. I'm off to Be. Should be activated tomorrow.
I hope Beardy-Branson takes the £50 "exit fee" I'm having to pay, and puts it towards more infrastructure. Because, they sorely need the investment.
When is anyone going to post a story about the traffic management changes they made to their (terrible) ADSL network last Friday, that has broken online gaming/VoIP/etc ever since?
Not like it was good prior to then. I mean, tell me a gamer that wants latency of 280ms to UK servers.
Checkout my 24/7 monitoring if you don't believe me:
http://bazza.dyndns.org/rrdstats/baz14all.cgi?p=1d
Try clicking on 'Year' and see if you can guess when I joined their service?
More on the traffic management:
http://bbs.adslguide.org.uk/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=virgin_adsl&Number=3198432&page=0&view=expanded&sb=5&o=7#Post3198432
Was it his strategy to change the traffic shaping last week (Thu night/Fri morn) so that it broke all online game (eg. 360/PS3) and VoIP?
In which case, would he mind un-doing it, before he leaves. He's FUBAR'd it.
Just read the complaints at:
http://bbs.adslguide.org.uk/postlist.php?Cat=&Board=virgin_adsl&page=0&view=expanded&sb=5&o=7
If you want 5-20% packet loss, and pings (to UK servers) around the 280ms mark, evenings & weekends, then Virgin Media's ADSL offering is the product for you.
Checkout my 24/7 latency/loss monitoring, and see if you can guess the month I moved to their ADSL?
http://bazza.dyndns.org/rrdstats/ping-year.cgi
*broad*band my arse.
Grrrrrr!!
I live in an apartment block, and a quick scan showed 9 visible wireless networks!! All competing for frequencies.
Until I moved to 200Mbps powerline I would get dropouts, poor signal/throughput, etc. But, life is great now!!
What kind of nic would the adaptors have, though? My Netgear adaptors have 100Mbit NICs, even though they are 200Mbit devices.