Re: Nothing new about this with IBM
"I got the benefits with the admonition I was to tell no one."
I sincerely hope you told every living soul within a 1000 mile radius.
2303 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Aug 2009
"Yes, IBM was a good employer; when it took me on (in 1984) it actively compared itself with the market surveys and wanted to be at the top."
When I left, IBM were just in the process of introducing market-based rates (I forget the acronym); where the market AVERAGE became this Holy grail in salary discussions. As in: if you were earning 80% of the market average for your position then you had a chance at a pay rise, but as you got closer to 100% the chance of any salary rise trended toward zero. The vast majority of people in my team were around 85-90% of the market-based rate.
The fiendishly clever bit is that IBM presented 100% of market rate as this incredible, aspirational goal that if you did reach it, meant that you could be very proud of yourself. Whereas in reality all it meant was that their very, very best people were - at absolute best - earning the average market rate.
"Built in/soldered on are pretty much interchangeable terms when it comes to chips"
Not in this context. Soldered on may have manufacturing advantages but offers little or no performance improvement. Built in - as in: on the same silicon die as the CPU - offers HUGE performance improvements due to the astronomically fast IO bus between CPU and memory. It also makes it absolutely impossible to selectively replace, but that's the price you pay for performance.
"For example, one passage describes an IBM vice president admitting "that neglecting to at least make an effort to transfer at least a few of the soon-to-be-laid-off IBM employees will 'blow a hole in our rhetoric.'""
To be fair to the VP in this quote, he/she appears to be trying to be somewhat moral here; as in - c'mon guys, let's at least TRY to do the right thing. Was probably in a room full of other VP vultures doing their best to savage the workforce, and was trying to keep some semblance of decency in the discussion whilst also trying to make sure his/her name didn't get 'accidentally' added to the redundancy list for not being a team player or some such bollocks.
Corollary to this are those little graphics/messages that chip designers etch into their products which should under normal circumstances never see the light of day; e.g. on a silicon wafer which then gets packaged into a ceramic SMD. It's amazing what you see when you mill off the ceramic and examine the silicon under a microscope; everything from 'Tom Was Here' to the Simpsons to eh - something much ruder.
Yes it matters. Shuttling half a gig between storage and RAM hammers responsiveness, also the half-gig is unlikely to stay at half a gig - memory leaks and poor management mean that'll likely be upwards of 1.5GB by the time you've finished a session. You've also got to ask what the living hell are they coding that could consume 512MB of space, unless it's horribly inefficient. Which brings its own performance issues.
Plus; with the exception of a few top-shelf Androids there aren't many phones that come with 16GB RAM (because they need it to stay afloat - Asus Zenfone 8 I'm looking at you); even the iPhone 13 Pro Max 'only' has 6GB.
” According to https://d1rytvr7gmk1sx.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Hive-Systems-Password-Table-1-770x346.jpg?x54432 you're looking at 3 days with modern 2022 hardware with local decryption.“
1) I think I trust security.org over a random JPEG
2) Even assuming the table is correct, it says 3 weeks for a 10-digit alphanumeric pw, not 3 days.
Assuming local decryption (so no network latency), security.org estimate that a random 10-digit alphanumeric password would take around 7 months to crack. So I would tend to agree that if it's being cracked in a day there's something else going on.
"So if you stop paying your credit card bill, YOUR Bank is going to be the one sending in the enforcers, Visa doesnt give two hoots if you pay your bill or not..."
Visa has already paid your bill on your behalf; the end-creditor already has their money. The Visa bill is you reimbursing them for the payment they've made, so the OP's original point is valid.
That said, I'm certain Visa won't just abandon any money they're owed. They'll probably continue to suck it out of your bank account via direct debits as per the 'agreement' you have with them, just refuse to allow you to make any more purchases on your card.
"While the aim is to hurt the oligarchs I am not convinced this will have more impact on the average Ivan. If the effects of sanctions and WWII are any examples, this will only backfire and make the average Ivan more supportive."
For any Russian who actually believes the official line of "Not a war, it's a limited military operation against the Ukrainian Nazi Government", measures like these serve a very useful purpose. You can deny reality all you like, and 'believe' Putin all you like, but it should be becoming blindingly obvious that nobody else outside Russia believes it.
I live in a democratically 'free' country which has occasionally(!) done things our media have also described as 'limited military operations'. The official messaging here could well also be propaganda (it works both ways), but if everything I own suddenly stops working because ALL of the companies have pulled out of my country in protest, I'd have to be wilfully blind to not question whether my government is telling me the truth on whether something bigger is happening.
As a secondary point, these measures tell me something too - not just the Russians. I also believe that this is actually a war and Russia is actually the aggressor (rather than a peaceful intervention misrepresented by fake news media); not because my State-owned media outlet tells me so, but because a hell of a lot of companies are actually taking action - which may hurt them financially - as a result of it.
"Exactly why I refuse to install my university's spyware, sorry Mobile Device Management, on my personal devices. It simply means thast outside of office hours, I don't look at work email. WIn for me."
I take a simple binary approach. If the device is owned by my employer, they have a perfect right to install whatever they like on it including MDM if they see fit. I will only ever use it for legitimate work purposes and will only ever access legitimate work data, so if my employer wipes it, that's their prerogative and I have lost nothing; because none of my data is on it.
On the other hand, my personal device has no work software on it, I will do no work on it whatsoever, and can (and do) install anything I like on it. My employer has zero jurisdiction here.
1. 5% users is in the "not economically viable to support" bracket.
2. A team of 5 people is nowhere near enough to keep these older systems *securely* supported.
3. Apple fully supports (HW/FW/OS/Security) systems back to 2012 (a decade), and for security even longer. So... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
4. '...total lack of hardship' - see (2), plus it's not just the immediate costs; there are far higher hidden costs associated with supporting very old hardware.
"Tim Verstynen, associate professor of cognitive neuroscience at Carnegie Mellon University, took to Twitter to post a "back of the envelope calculation" to explain why exactly Musk's claims were so far-fetched."
Confucius he say; 'Man who say task is impossible, should not get in way of man doing it.' Good on Elon for refusing to settle for the status quo, and daring to try and make the future happen.
""Speed doesn't kill ... Rather, the difference in speed kills."
No, that's also wrong.
It's the sudden stop that kills."
And a sudden stop isn't a difference in speed?
Plus; it doesn't need to be a stop to be deadly. A train going at 125mph hitting a rambler walking in the same direction along the train tracks at 3mph will also end up rather bad for the rambler's health, even though neither will 'stop'. Ergo: difference in speed kills.
"...as anyone who has suddenly had to dive off the path during a parkland walk will tell you"
These things are absolutely everywhere round where I live, but I have never - EVER - seen anybody need to dive off a path to get out of the way; or anything remotely close. They're no more or less dangerous or a nuisance than cyclists, and there's zero reason to keep them illegal other than padding the state's coffers.
"I think it may be stretching things a little to describe speak&spell as being microprocessor based, but I don't know much about that. I do know it's somewhat inaccurate to say it had a speech synsthesis chip in it, it used audio compression with a very low data rate."
It used a TMS5100 Digital Signal Processor.
from TI's Richard Wiggins:
Each word was represented by a series of phonemes. This speech data was stored in the device’s memory (on 2 128 kilobit ROMs, at the time the largest capacity ROM in use); then when the Speak & Spell was told to say a word, the command was processed through a 4-bit microprocessor and speech synthesizer.
"Well, the issue is actually getting anything to/from the iPad... for example a PDF to read at lunch.
There's simply no way to do it from Linux. "
Go to iCloud.com in your Linux browser, open iCloud Drive, and drag & drop any files you want accessible on your iDevice. Job done.
Or you can email them to yourself if you only need one or two.
"Historically "new technology" in iPhones like "retinal display", "OLED display" and "wireless charging" are technologies Apple bought from Samsung long after they appeared in Samsung products but Apple's brilliant marketing convinced their fanbois it was new, unique & exciting."
Bullshit.
"You asked, so I'll answer.
"Can you access the App Store from your device?": Yes.
+1.
"Is it safe to use,": I guess so. I don't view that as a high bar, though. A lot of software is safe to use without justifying it being forced on me with mandatory payments.
No. Creating and curating a safe app environment is a lot of work, taking a lot of time and money to do right. As an example of how NOT to do it, have a look at the Google Play Store from a couple of years ago. It's better now, and you'll note that they charge the same 30% that Apple do.
"fast, reliable": Not really. Updates don't show up instantly, sometimes they don't download right and I have to press again. I've had Signal tell me that a new version is available when Apple doesn't think it's true.
Then Signal has a bug. Don't blame Apple for your app's deficiencies.
"and tailored to your preferences?": Not in the slightest. My preference would be for the old layout where the search and updates tabs were not hidden and where search would at least find the app you typed in rather than show five unrelated ads and go into the results list organized with bogosort.
I'll kind of give you this, although if the app you're looking for is in the Store, it'll be shown up top. If not, Apple will suggest others (with varying degrees of success) that it thinks might match what you're looking for. Bear in mind most users don't know the exact name of the app they're looking for, so nonexact matching is a valid methodology.
"Are the apps themselves curated and high quality?": No. They're just what was sent in. A lot of crap apps are there. Apple only tries to keep out active malware and stuff that competes with theirs.
Flat out wrong. Points for trolling though.
"Can you install them without having to learn what sideloading means?": By definition, yes, but the implied argument is a tautology. People on Windows can manage to install software without having to learn the word sideloading, so it doesn't seem to be a problem. I could as easily say that sideloading should be the only mechanism because then you wouldn't have to learn how the store app works, but that would be just as weak."
"How exactly am I benefiting from the service Apple is providing?"
Can you access the App Store from your device? Is it safe to use, fast, reliable and tailored to your preferences? Are the apps themselves curated and high quality? Can you install them without having to learn what sideloading means?
That's what you get as an end user. And devs pay the 30% because it's worth that to them to get their app in front of your eyes in that safe curated environment.
It makes perfect sense.
It's not the technical aspects of the overhaul that are difficult, it's the financial aspects. How to safeguard the revenue stream when they risk losing 90% of App Store revenue overnight. Do we ban free apps? Increase dev fees to compensate? Allow 3rd party payment links but deprecate and demote them where possible? Come up with a completely new business model?
This is what they mean by overhaul.
As far as I'm aware, Apple haven't 'disappeared' anything from users' devices, and haven't withdrawn any rights to view. What they DO say might happen is that if a rights owner withdraws a movie from the iTunes Store, it might not be available for redownload at some time in the future (so make sure you have a digital copy somewhere and you will be fine), and also that if you move your AppleID from one region to another, you might not be able to access the same movies on iTunes due to region licensing issues. This is a studio region licensing issue, totally f*cked up in my view, but also not Apple's fault.
I had exactly the same thing when I moved from the US to Europe; all my movies "disappeared" and I thought they'd been deleted (as did the Apple support guy, was the first time he'd seen it happen) but we figured out it was region licensing, I switched my ID temporarily back to US and they all became visible again. I downloaded them and put them on a hard drive, then moved my ID to Europe again. Yes switching between regions is a pain, but it was no different to my DVD player at the time; my US movies wouldn't play on my new European player, so for a while I had two players stacked on top of each other and switched between them.
Note that the 2018 da Silva case (guy was all over the Internet claiming his movies had been deleted) wasn't a case of Apple deleting stuff as he claimed, it was the fact that he'd moved from Australia to Canada, and had transferred his AppleID across locations; which meant that he was not able to (re)download them from the new location which had different licensing laws. What's important here is that if he had set his ID back to Australia, all his movies became available again. I'm not saying he was lying, but he was certainly being economical with the truth when accusing Apple of "deleting" his movies. They didn't.
Agile when done well (meaning: implemented in the right way, in the right places, and supported by the org) is a powerful methodology. The problems start when it's applied as a one-size-fits-all, is used as an excuse for poor planning or is deployed without support from the business, meaning it's just a vanity project. Then it turns into a disaster.