Re: Can't Believe...
Surely that was Windows XP, so it's not been as long as you think.
(willing to be corrected -- ooer missus)
658 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Aug 2009
Actually the real problem is that the word "English" is taken to be synonymous with "British". Now I don't really mind being British (although I would feel better about it if I didn't think the term actually meant English nationalism) but I don't think my community's views are being upheld in a system that favours English nationalism. I don't feel English. Brexit is a case in point. I don't know anyone who wanted to leave the EU. A quick glance at the electoral map shows that pattern right across Scotland. I know that there are communities in other parts of the UK where the opposite is true, but hey it would be boring if we were all the same.
PS my constituency hasn't had a tory MP since the 1930's.
"...have a referendum of the English asking us whether WE want Scotland to be independent..."
Just to clarify, so you're saying English nationalism is OK, but Scottish nationalism is -- what? traitorous or something?
You don't have to answer, I already know what you think.
This is healthcare software. When only two manufacturers make the stuff you want and neither of them wants to play ball, you take what you can get. I've been involved in specialized software deployment at a coalface level, and honestly the bottom line is that you take what's available and shoe-horn your processes to fit that. And that goes from patient admin software to the tools required to mine data from the lab system. I could expand but I don't want to go further off-topic than I have already.
...anybody's surprised at "dear old Internet Explorer" in the NHS. A large number of expensive browser-based applications only ran on IE of a certain vintage until recently. I believe manufacturers had to be threatened with losing the business before they would upgrade their software to run on more recent (read more secure) versions. Some still required IE (not Chrome or any other pretender) when I retired at the end of 2019.
"... if it's out of print then tough..."
I was going to just downvote you, but decided to do this instead.
In this age where storage is cheap and plentiful, there is no excuse for anything to be out of print (read unavailable). Yes, there was for print editions, they are bulky and expensive to store - authors of my acquaintance have pallets of their books in the garage that they rescued from publishers who otherwise would have pulped them - and have a shelf life unless they were printed on acid free paper, but digital versions of books should be eternal. An author going out of fashion is no reason to prevent interested readers from obtaining a copy of the book.
Out of print isn't tough, it's negligence.
...books that are unavailable any other way than as unlicensed electronic downloads? Surely authors should welcome the exposure (yes, I know about the "for the exposure" scam) if their publisher is no longer making the work available, I have often chased a book by a favourite author only to discover that the only way to get a copy is to download it.
Does no-one else remember Bob Shaw's "Light of Other Days" where the authorities know who committed the crime due to mass surveillance, but didn't want to admit to that, so they ask a sleuth to solve the crime for them.
They already know who did it, they just don't want to admit how they know, so...blame Google...
A month after I retired, I went to our group IT Christmas night out. I was persuaded to trundle along to the Trust IT night out after the meal. Most of the Trust guys, I knew by name or had phoned/emailed. A disconcerting number came up to me and said "oh YOU'RE John110"
I naively told someone who should have known better "you've inherited this computer, so just delete files that aren't yours..."
That was when I worked out how to retrieve the operating system from a windows 95 recycle bin when windows wouldn't boot... (well it was either that or explain to IT support how dumb I'd been)
...regarding people's housekeeping habits. I worked in a teaching hospital (before the retirement fairy visited), the practical part of a medical school -- Training the next generation of doctors, nurses etc. They have had to replace the carpets in the foyer three times because of chewing gum embedded in it (finally, they just tiled the stairs and they get somebody in in the summer to steam it all off). Who spits chewing gum onto a carpet!! Especially who with the levels of intelligence and qualifications required to be a Doctor spits chewing gum onto a carpet!!!
And as for tea-rooms. My particular place of employment was a Microbiology lab. Every six months, a nice lady would go through the fridge and empty out the hairy sandwiches and vastly out of date yoghurt and juice cartons and send a group email reminding people to wash the stuff in the sink, don't just dump it there. (She's retired, so goodness knows who does it now)
"But I thought the NHS was trying to cure cancer?"
Off Topic:
Biomedical research cures cancer. But it's not in the interests of companies who manufacture anti-cancer drugs that cancer be cured, but just in case a cure is found, they charge as obscenely much as they possibly can for the drugs while there is still a market for them. They also cancel research projects that might help the human race, but eat into their profits if they succeed.
The NHS is trying to cope with toxic capitalism.