Adverts? What are them then?
Not seen any on my web browser since installing UBlock Origin. Not seen any on TV since deciding nearly 20 years ago to stop watching it live.
5086 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Aug 2009
Unlike the USA where STUD walls dominate much of the UK housing stock has brick or breeze block walls which are a problem with 5G signals.
I'm not sure it's as 'bad' as that. My house was built in 1991 and has stud walls so that would lead me to assume that every house built in the last 30 years does. Given how many houses have been built since then I'm not convinced that solid walls 'dominate'. They might even be the minority.
Lol, this is not a new idea. I'm still using my original BT supplied HG612 in modem mode and my own supplied Vigor router doing all the clever stuff.
I would never use an ISP that insisted on me using their router and as I've posted here before I dislike ISPs that promote themselves on the basis of their router's Wifi capabilities. I will never believe that an ISP supplied router (nominally supplied for free) will ever be as good as a router that I have chosen myself and have paid money for.
I'm with IDNet and although they will sell a router it's a reasonably good off-the shelf router and all they do is configure it for your account. You don't have to buy it and they are quite happy to let their customers use their own routers and will even try and help you with them although understandably they advise that if they didn't supply it there might be a limit as to what they can do.
Well, except for the batteries, generator, and redundant switching equipment. All the things which make the ordinary telephone network far, far, more reliable and resilient than a broadband internet link.
The question was concerning the cost of making a call, not the reliability.
The clue is in the way it was phrased:
How much it will be to make a "phone" call to another digital only user across their "phone" network?
It'll cost the same as now or less. From the consumer's point of view it's a like-for-like change.
99% of a telephone call in the UK has been digital for several decades now. Even System X is digital.
"Each analogue line module unit converts analogue signals from a maximum of 64 subscriber lines in the access network to the 64 kilobit/s digital binary signals used in the core network."
All that's happening here is the removal of the last remaining analogue component in the last mile..or perhaps more correctly moving it from the exchange into the subscriber's home.
I reckon my request to Google is way down the list. I just want the sat nav voice to say 'Pavillons Way' rather than 'Pavilions Way'. The map has it correctly marked so it must just be some kind of vocalisation issue. Perhaps the logic just refuses to use French words when outputting directions in English.
In case people had not noticed, Sky has a large number of broadcast channels that are not easily available elsewhere
Most of my viewing is Discovery, Sky History, Crime & Investigation and ID (I wish they'd provide an HD version of that) and other than VM I don't know if any of those are available elsewhere. Nat Geo used to be another popular one but seems to have gone off the boil for me recently.
People have this view of Sky subscribers as only wanting to watch all the latest US dramas but not all of us do. I only have a few Sky owned channel in my favourites list and of those the most watched - Sky History - has only recently been taken over.
Most of what I watch is carried on relatively minority channels and whilst it might be possible to find things elsewhere I doubt it's as convenient. And convenience (aka 'inertia') is a significant factor not to be overlooked. I could spend my time trawling the 'net trying to find stuff or else I could do what I've done for years. Browse the EPG during quiet moments and mark things to be recorded. When it comes to watching I just fire up the box and TV and look to see what's already on the box waiting to be viewed. My 2GB Sky Q box is currently 62% full with new programming waiting for me to watch.
It still baffles me how Sky+ subscribers are happy to pay money for the ability to record broadcast programming they can otherwise freely receive on a hard disk that sits under the TV they'll watch them on.
Not all of the programming available on Sky is available on free platforms. I haven't kept up to date with channel line-ups across platforms but many years ago I had a Freesat recorder and some channels that were available on 'Free TV from Sky' were not available on 'Freesat'. There were quite a lot of channels that were restricted to Sky because while they were FTV (Free To View) they weren't FTA (Free To Air). Freeview was another option I had and again a slightly different line-up.
It's possible that some people felt it worth paying for Sky+ in order to be able to view their favourite 'free' channel.
But I suspect inertia was also a factor. Either that or some people actually like to keep copies of programmes to watch over and over(*) so might have kept paying the fee to ensure they have access to their library.
(*)I've never understood why. There is almost nothing that I would wish to watch more than once and so much new stuff coming out that I'm happy to spot the rare example and record it again. I have a strict record-watch-delete policy :)
What bugs me about Sky is that they want you to pay £X per month and still shovel adverts down your throat.
Without the adverts it would be £X+Y per month. But why let it bug you? Sky's service is not and never has been essential. It's a luxury service and entirely optional. Either you consider it worth the money or you don't.
And if adverts bother you then stop watching live TV! If you record everything you can skip the adverts quite effectively. Fastforward can be tedious but many years ago even Sky finally relented and implemented the 'jump 30 seconds' feature. I haven't watched live TV at home since Sky+ was first launched for just that reason. Skipping over an ad-break becomes quite automatic.
It's also worth noting that not all the channels (not even the majority) available on the Sky platform are owned by Sky. Channels that don't have 'Sky' in their name are independent and are just paying to be listed on the EPG and (if they want/need it(*)) to have their data stream encrypted using the Sky system.
(*)One or both of two reasons: One because they are renting space on a satellite that covers multiple regions and have to be able to demonstrate to rights holders that they can control which markets have access to the programming (viewing cards are tied to postcodes). Two because they rely on the Sky kickbacks and want to prevent people watching their output without a Sky box.
One born in the U S of A!
I was watching a show about car renovation recently and two of the engineers were arguing over fractions of an inch while trying to calculate a centre line and cutting point for a box. I so wish I could have been there to turn their rulers the other way round and measure everything in millimetres.
God bless America..because they need all the help they can get.
You only need to heat the room you're working in. So close the door and use an oil filled radiator. If it's a small room it shouldn't take much energy to keep it warm between you, the computer, monitors and the radiator.
The walk to/from a chilly kitchen ain't gonna kill anyone so just let the rest of the house cool down like it would if you weren't there.
BT who own the network, wants to turn off all copper phone lines (PSTN) by 2025.
No they don't (well they might want to but they know they can't). What BT is turning off is something called WLR which is just the wholesale voice service. Copper lines will remain active and in use across the country and will only be turned off if/as/when an exchange reaches an FTTP threshold of 75% (presumably at that point they will also fill in the remaining 25%).
Your ISP should be able to provide you with a plug and play solution. If not just sign up for a VoIP provider and port your number. I signed up with Vonage and they just send out a small box that you attach to your LAN and that has a normal telephone port. No config required.
Sorry but what you're describing, 60Mbps, is not good, is not broadband, isn't speedy. That should be the lowest by law.
What is that you can't do with a 60Mb/s connection? Even when shared by a family. Tell us what makes it inadequate, please, because 60Mb/s is enough for two or three UHD streams with plenty left over for email and gaming(*).
(*)Admittedly not if you include game updates but that just requires patience or scheduling the updates for when no-one is stream UHD video.
I live in a town that has 50K population and has been around for 70+ years.
Large sections are Not spots for Mobile coverage and Telephone networks are also mostly 50 years old as well .... i.e. Old copper mostly routing where the population is not !!!
In short, Broadband is quite bad and mobile cover is also. Not in prosperous south so not pulling in money to encourage investment in inproving our lot !!!
No need to be coy - name and shame.
Hmm, I believe people in UK typically buy the only thing available at their address, which in 99% of cases is ADSL (so no broadband).
Rubbish.
https://www.uswitch.com/broadband/studies/broadband-statistics
"UK broadband statistics show that there were 27.8 million fixed broadband lines in the UK at the end of Q3 2022—an increase of 91,000 (0.3%) year-on-year. Of these, around 70% (19.4 million) were predominantly FFTC or full fibre variants"
That's nearly two years ago.
https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/guides/broadband-availability-snapshot/
"Broadband Technology Availability Percentage
ADSL 97%
FTTC 96%
FTTP 22%
Cable (Virgin Media FTTC) 53%"
Almost every property in the UK has access to VDSL.
I doubt it. Time and time again the UK core network has been shown to have ample capacity. Everyone suddenly working from home didn't bother it. Apple releasing an iUpdate doesn't bother it. Major sporting events don't bother it. There is no issue with the capacity of the core networks (there are multiple such networks) and historically no reason to think that is going to change.
UK infrastructure seems to be stuck in the 2 tin cans and a bit of string era
Not really and by 2026 the figure should be over 90%.
If everyone in the UK took the highest speed service they could get our average would be a lot higher. However people in the UK typically buy on price rather than speed. To be honest given how few services actually need more than 20Mb/s that might be quite sensible. A 60Mb/s FTTC connection would be more than adequate for most families even if they enjoy UHD streaming.
And I do suspect that most of these issues are down to the ISP rather than the physical connection. That's based on my own experience (a couple of complaints from neighbours but perfect service for me) and from following forums like Thinkbroadband.
Most Brits find broadband outages to be almost as annoying as someone jumping a queue? If it is that annoying how come so few people are willing to spend an extra £5/month on a decent ISP?
I agree with you and yes it depends where the fault really are. Were they in the cabinet, exchange, backhaul or their actual ISP's servers?
Mind you I suppose we could argue that if everyone was prepared to pay a bit more then it would filter down to the underlying supplier thereby addresses issues in the last mile.
You don't really own modern cars. Yes, you might have paid a load of £££/$$$ for it and have not only the receipts but the V5/title but if the maker can brick your car at will then... who really owns it? They do.
The UK V5 document never did indicate ownership. It only records who the registered keeper is ie;who will be assumed to be responsible for any offenses committed with/by the vehicle.
application developers have learned not to ask for admin privleges unless they really need it.
So a success in that area at least. As a developer one aspect that irritated me was the installation process and especially the weird changes and choices around installation folders over the years.
Trying to create an installer that could handle ever scenario (corporate and consumer) was a pain in the arse.
Most people charging at home will only be topping the battery up.
If chargers are readily available the driver just has to make a minor mental adjustment. Instead of running the car until it's almost out of charge (like most of us do with ICE(*)) you charge them every time you park them. Most cars only do about 30 miles a day so even if your employer or shopping centre doesn't offer a charging facility you're still only putting 10% of the battery capacity in when you get back home. Most EVs will be recharged within fifteen minutes even on a slow charger.
(*)Okay so the more sensible of us think about refilling when the gauge says half empty but still. EV charging should be a different mindset. Very few car journeys require the vehicle to be driven for hundreds of miles between recharge points and if charging points are frequent enough it just isn't necessary.
What they did was worry about the state of their business and tried to make themselves feel more in control by forcing their employees back into the office. "I can't control the sales but by Tutatis I can force my employees to be sat at their desks by 9am!"
For some managers it might even just be a pathetic attempt to create value for their position. They have realised that with no-one in the office and everyone working happily from home they had no purpose any longer.
I retired rather than go back into the office. The company lost one of their best and most experienced software developers. Good strategy, guys.
Like the other 95% of desktop users I've been using 'something else'.
Linux on the desktop is an almost vanishingly small minority not helped by all the stupid spats over which 'distro' is best. Nothing that happens in the 'Linux desktop arena' is of any importance beyond the handful of people still clinging to it.
Face it. As a desktop operating system Linux is an abject failure. Possibly not for technical reasons but still - it is providing a desktop experience to such a small percentage of users that really if it reverted to being nothing but a console-based server OS the world wouldn't care.
Just drop the engine first. It only takes a minute.
Mind you that puts me in mind of the Haynes instructions for gapping an Austin Metro's distributor.
"First remove the radiator as described in chapter...".
Actually all you needed was to grab a passing street urchin and ask them to remove the cap.
I was playing golf when the jets were scrambled a month or so ago. A mate of mine is a bit miffed that he took his swing about half a minute before the boom. It would've been so much more impressive if it had coincided with the boom.
Actually it wasn't so much a boom as a bang.
BT switching off POTS does not directly impact the copper wires and does not imply or require that FTTP be available.
All BT are doing is withdrawing their WLR (Wholesale Line Rental) product. Any CPs that have unbundled their voice service (eg; Talk Talk or Sky) can continue to offer an analogue service if they want to although I'd guess that they too would rather see the back of it and will see this as an opportunity to get out of the market as well.
In any case the ending of WLR or whatever voice service you have just means that you will have to switch to a VoIP service. Whether that VoIP service is carried over copper, FTTP or waved flags is irrelevant.
I talk to people who say, I'm ditching my landline because money, and I say, don't, because when something happens the mobile network will be locked up and I quote "I'll just connect to a different mobile tower" *sigh* and this from a person using a Hubitat smart home...
Another issue is that if some scrote breaks in to your house and burgles you they might take your computer and your mobile phone but they are unlikely to bother taking a an old landline handset. Thus when you get in/wake up you still have a means of contacting people to sort the mess out.
Yes (sort of). When I subscribed to my VoiP service I had to supply an address that was linked to the device. I forget what the wording was but it implied that was a legal requirement and me it clear it had to be the address where the device was located.
I wrote 'sort of' because I don't think my VoIP box is tied to my IP address so if the box could be moved and would probably still work thus invalidating the location information.
They also seem a lot more precious about it. I remember several years ago while on a business trip watching daytime TV. One of the characters got their head blown apart by a gunshot quite graphically but their partner's response was bleeped out.
WTF kind of country is it that considers the gore of a head being blown apart to be fine to watch whilst objecting to profanity?
Backward compatibility is probably the biggest issue for Windows (it being driven by the marketing and finance department the next biggest).
Truth is that software development resources are hard to find (have been for decades) and most managers can't afford to have them working on stuff that has no financial or marketing driven purpose. People continue to use old applications because they are used to them (warts and all) and the sheer number and variety of users it directly supports imposes a massive burden on the Windows development team.
Linux has - possibly - more people overall dependant on it now but the vast majority are only secondarily dependant (they do things that rely on a Linux server backend). That reduces and simplifies the interface between old and new code.
On the other hand when I called Sky to cancel Netflix last year they offered to let me have my package (ie; everything except Netflix) for half price if I just agreed to sign up for another 12 months. I didn't have to ask and there was no hard sell. The lady just removed Netflix then said something like "Oh, you know what? I could reduce your subscription by half if you are happy to sign up for a 12 month contract".
Since I hadn't intended to leave anyway it was a no-brainer :)
The UK judgement appears to have achieved nothing. For the past few months I've had to scroll back up the order form to confirm that I really don't want Prime after I select the free delivery option.
It's a shit UI and someone at Amazon should be ashamed.
I don't want their free TV and music and I don't give a toss when items actually arrive. I just want to pay the lowest cost possible and I actually enjoy the randomness of free delivery.
Fuck off and stop trying to get me to subscribe to Prime or I'll go elsewhere,
Another problem (arguably what's at the heart of all email issues) is that the headers can be faked anyway. The headers need not be (and usually aren't) read by the receiving mail server other than perhaps a cursory syntax check.
The mail delivery process is basically 'Hi, my name is Beelzebub. Please chuck these bytes into this/these mailboxes.'.
The sending machine can put anything it wants into these headers. The actual content of the headers is unimportant and ignored by most mail servers. This is why I can send you an email that is apparently addressed to someone completely different and sent from someone fictitious. If you've ever received spam that claims to have been sent by yourself then this is how. The sender just puts your email address into the 'Reply To' or 'From' field and the server doesn't care.
The only sure fire way to know where an email came from and validate the recipient is to monitor the initial handshake process on the server. The SMTP command 'RCPT TO' is what directs the email to an inbox not the 'To' field in the header. And it's only at the point of handshake that you can be sure who the sender is because you know the source IP address and can trace the sender from there.
This is why I continue to run my own mail server. It has the ability to filter on 'RCPT TO' and do other good things at the handshake level. I really can stop the spam at the front gate and senders can't mask their identity. I use a Disposable Email Address system and give every contact their own unique address. In conjunction with RCPT TO filtering I know who is responsible for every email. And if I get spam sent to an address I only gave you then I have the option of blacklisting the address thus stopping future spam and not bothering to issue you with another unique address thus severing our email relationship.