memes & social networks
Is the 'general happiness' from memes sufficient to counteract the depression caused by instagram & facebook ?
2289 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Jul 2009
I'm no fan of Microsoft, but these are insider test builds, right ? Not passed out to all and sundry, but only if you want to take them, warts and all ?
While I think they ought to be tested better than they apparently are, I don't see why anyone running them should have cause to complain.
It does have the hardware. It doesn't use hardware to detect 'hello Alexa', it does that in software. The only restriction is that, currently, the owners of the device (note : that's not you) assure us that the sampled sound isn't stored or constantly sent to them. A situation that, even if true, need not remain so.
>3. Linux: accessibility is a bad joke.
I'm sure you're right, but there are people trying to address it. Here's a fairly active project and I note that they're asking for problem reports from users to help direct the devs.
https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility
What are the difficulties ? Are the solutions adequate or are they too hard to install ?
It's always worth considering what you can do yourself to help improve Linux - it might be writing code, but it can also be testing, writing bug reports, project managing, project championing. They're all needed to keep something on track.
As people have noted about other Linux problem areas : at least when they get fixed, if they're used, they tend to stay maintained for long periods. Not just dropped or accidentally broken like Windows.
It's not so long since Wifi was potluck on Linux. Now it pretty much always works but I never know if the Windows 10 box is going to connect.
It's not part of the normal manufacturing system for conventional boards, though there are high-density stack-chip manufacturing methods with similarities. I think it could be done, at considerable cost and inconvenience. So unlikely in high volume, but possible for 'specials'.
The problem is made worse by trying to categorise the sources as left, right, reliable etc. These are largely subjective, making the categories biased.
What would be better would be posting a link with each 'fact' to the source of that fact, so readers could click back through the trail and judge for themselves whether they believe the actual source.
> In the UK you can register with the TPS and then complain to the ICO (who have been known to actually do something about it)
I am registered with the TPS. I did look at complaining to the ICO once but it appeared to involve collecting more data than I remember to note. Doubtless I'll try again when I get another run of similar ones.
I read recently that dialling 1477 should log the illegal call, but BT don't appear to support that.
Here in the UK, I'm seeing a big rise in speculative calls - made to keep a human operator busy but dropped when he gets another answer.
More robocalls too, but they're mostly 'legitimate' - appointment reminders, account chasers etc.
I put the phone down as soon as I recognise a robot : if they want to contact me so much, they can get a real person to do it. I also drop calls that have a recognisable call-centre background buzz, or appear to be offline until after I respond.
I don't care that I don't get a message that I might have wanted. I'm doing my bit to make legit robocallers unusable as well as spammers.
From that article : "said that as a general principle of learning, it “somehow smells right.”
Mechanical and electrical engineers point at software engineers and laugh : there isn't any engineering, they say, just guesswork and testing. Nowadays, just guesswork. And they have a point.
But if 'somehow smells right' is what passes for verification, I think the deep learning folks have taken it to a whole new level.
I'm also unsure that it's reasonable to describe deep learning systems as 'so successful'. Are they ? They've been successfully marketed recently but I haven't seen too much evidence that they're actually useful. Are you sure they're not just really good at confirming their author's prejudices ?
Outside of the political management, there are at least some honest people who might object to big enough cover-ups. Snowden et. al. have frightened the government into not being caught out too badly. How many more whistleblowers would be needed to bring the whole thing down ?
Any half-decent communications tool (like , uh, email for instance. Or letter post. Or the telephone) allows you sufficiently fine-grained control of status that you can easily be 'online' to some people while being 'unavailable' to others. Until that's possible, these social networking tools remain toys.
It's a valid argument for consumer devices (though designing to a decades-old standard creates many problems) but is irrelevant to a data centre, where you need only the peripherals you bought from the manufacturer (and often only disc and network).
And android phones seem to have very little difficulty running arbitrary Android apps. Because the OS isolates the user from the hardware, as it's meant to do.
We really, really don't want people coding applications for specific hardware any more. Meanwhile, with PCI and USB, drivers are getting more portable. They're more tied to the OS they run under than the platform the hardware is attached to.
Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the argument, a law that has to have specific get-outs to preserve some behaviour is not a good law.
Make a law that embodies the principle you want to support in a workable way. If you're having to make exemptions you haven't really distinguished the behaviour.