Why are they even running Windows for a job that only needs a media player or photo frame application ?
These things only require a little aliexpress box, not a huge bugpile of an OS.
2289 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Jul 2009
What you get in exchange for enabling the BT service is the ability to use it on others addresses when you're not at home. It generates a separate SSID, it doesn't open up your home network.
However, when I tried it, the signals I could get from other users were so poor that it was unusable.
> All this bullshit about removing statues and monuments to people who did anything remotely bad.
> We shouldn't be airbrushing them out of history. Teach people about them, and what they did.
> Don't remove them.
I'm not in favour of removing them from history. How could we learn from their mistakes if we hide them ?
But where they occupy a place of honour, such as the name of a building or a prominently-placed statue, I think it's reasonable to show our disgust by placing them in a museum - an actual repository of history, not an airbrush - rather than in pride of place.
Their work is more problematical, Rowling being a good example. Since her work doesn't, as far as I'm aware, make any comment on trans people I see no reason to cancel that. But it's common to provide a platform for people who have produced well-known and appreciated work : we don't have to do that if it's likely to disseminate unacceptable views.
We deal with Hitler in this way and, by and large, it's successful. We don't ban Mein Kampf - we allow it as an object lesson. We do ban far-right groups who disseminate those views. It hasn't resulted in complete suppression of those groups but they have remained a minority, at least in Europe.
What this ends up saying is : you cannot make simple rules about free speech. It requires thought, judgement and open discussion.
And for reliability. Your tests were performed using some version of imported code. If you rebuild using another version, those tests are invalid. Just because you're using a later version with supposed bugfixes doesn't mean that there aren't new bugs, or that the fixes don't trigger latent bugs in your code.
You need to know when you import a new version, and repeat your testing when it happens. Until that point your code is made less reliable by importing a bugfix, not more reliable.
To be fair, the guy who built the dual DVI system was also the guy who defined the PIO's instruction set.
But yes, I've seen a lot of interest in the PIO. A few other devices have something like it - the beaglebone's PRUs, Motorola's TPUs, the Cypress USB engine, the parallax propellor .. but they're largely seen as rather specialised, for the expert. These cheap and accessible PIOs that can be used to generate video could get a bit more interest going in assembler programming and FPGA state machines.
It sounds as though the choice was made by Osborne rather than a spy. So maybe he should pay.
I can understand not wanting to work in Canary Wharf. Dire place. Dire people. Only the City is worse.
The original backstreet location seemed far more appropriate for spies really.
A posh new building smacks far too much of that riverside location Bond flew a speedboat out of.
> I humbly submit that this particular branch of human stupidity can and should stand alone without dragging politics into it.
I agree (and upvoted). But while the sensitivity is certainly present on either end of the spectrum, the objections to this sort of change are almost always expressed in arguments that sound all too like those of the right - they're in terms of 'why should your opinion be foisted on me'.
So yeah, keep politics out of it. But if your stance is from the left, please try to keep your replies expressed in a way that's in keeping with your idealogy. Or I'm going to mistake you for the person you hate.
I was inclined to say the same about SPI. I feel that it's an accurate representation of what a slave was (and, sadly, is) : it performs precisely in lockstep with the demands of its master. This is not so much a defence of the term slave as a further condemnation of it as a descrption to be used of a person.
However, after seeing some other redefinition of MISO and MOSI which I felt lost the unamibiguity of the original names, and looking carefully at the terms suggested in that document - some of which are outright incorrect for an SPI bus - , I think either leader/follower or primary/secondary are adequate descriptions of a situation where the data clock is controlled wholly by the leader.
It appears that 'master' is not considered quite so offensive and has some application where it carries no connotations of slavery. It's slave that's the big problem. This could allow us to use Master/Secondary which not only accurately describes the relationship but also retains the existing MISO / MOSI acronyms.
Yes, it's whitewashing. Yes, it will allow people confused by the clear distinction of these situations to continue their pointless sensitivity. But it's not an argument worth winning. There will be others.
"What I don't like about the post-apartheid settlement is PR by party list. That breaks the accountability link between electors and politicians. A constituency + PR-based top-up system would be a lot better."
Indeed, and I'd go further. NO members should be elected without voters that are responsible for them. So no party-driven top-ups.
The real problem with PR as usually proposed, though, is that it confirms and strengthens the Party system. Parties are what's wrong with our politics, and and solution needs to make them less, not more powerful.
My preference is for STV or a related system, voting for a county's worth of members rather than a single individual. This could avoid the problem of 'wasted' votes whilst retaining the link between constituencies and members, and keeping the parties from choosing members (other than by 'safe seats').
Your suggested policy doesn't state that targeted marketing be outlawed, only made explicit.
If documenting the target market means market targeting is impossible, then that implies there is something about targeting that only works of the target is unaware of the intentions.
It's difficult to argue that such a situation should be allowed as it suggests intentional lying.
I'd prefer that the OS reliably stopped it.
The reasonable expectation is that you're only running the camera if you have a video application running. You shouldn't need to mechanically close it as well.
If you have no reason to trust your software, a bit of tape or any small object is adequate. The problem is not the existence of a shutter, but remembering to use it.