Well
In bothering to research the photos beyond "soldiers, black and white, must be WW2, they'll do", she might have accidentally found out that the images were copyrighted or something. Can't have that now, can we?
Freetard FAIL.
406 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jul 2009
I know he's pushing their products, but it's painfully obvious the guy knows bugger all about cameras and photography if that's really what he believes. By extension, neither does Nokia unless he's gone rogue PR on them.
Now if I'm going to buy a camera, even one built into a phone, I'm not going to buy it from a company this clueless about cameras.
John, if you're representative of the sort of arguments and general attitude presented by ORG activists, it's no bloody wonder they took a kicking.
I would say a well deserved kicking, but by taking the extreme line they did and getting stuffed, they've made things worse for everyone except the music business.
Yeah, job well done there.
By contrast Stop43 seems to have been a textbook example of how to engage in the political discussion in a way which can carry influence and gain results.
The proper icon to attach to your post is the 8th one along on the second row.
Unless of course you're serious, in which case, may I refer you to the icon attached to this post.
Everyone who thought this was a great idea, all the way up to the highest level of administration which gave the OK for it, should be made an example of.
...less polluting form of transport do you suggest I use to get from the US to the UK and back again this summer? Bearing in mind that I don't have an extra spare week to spend going by boat, and swimming is clearly out of the question.
This sort of enviro-numpty idiocy is why the Green movement is not, and may never be, taken seriously by the people it needs to be taken seriously by.
Too many people just vote for the same party they always do, regardless of any other factors. Usually the floating voters and turnout will decide the outcome of an election, but in some places there are such large concentrations of voters who always vote the same way that really, having democratic elections is a bit pointless.
Which quite defeats the purpose of having democracy in the first place.
Somewhere back in the mists of time, PDF was simple. Acrobat Reader was simple and small. They did exactly what was necessary to provide a portable document ideally suited to on-screen viewing, printing out and *nothing* *more*.
Then, as usual with these things, the software company responsible had to go ruin it with needless "convenience" features and fancy stuff nobody really needs (Javascript? Embedded executables? How is it a portable document if it's got an OS-specific EXE buried in there anyway? WTF??), and in the process left it full of security holes, not to mention turning a simple document reader program into a full-fledged example of bloat gone wild (a 38MB download for version 9? Really? Their heads have come undone if they think that's acceptable).
You would *think* that someone would have figured this out after the raft of viruses targeted at Word and Excel files, but apparently not.
DO NOT: toss another shrimp on the barbie. Tossing of food items can lead to injury and is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine and possibly jail time depending on the severity of the offence.
You must *carefully* lower it on using the approved heat-resistant cookware of no less than 1 metre in length, while wearing approved safety glasses and protective apron. Only licensed grill operators may approach within 10 metres of a grill, and then only if a licensed fire-extinguisher operator is on-site and wearing appropriate fireproof gear.
All grills, fire extinguishers and other mandatory safety equipment listed in the "Grilling Code" section 2a paragraph 42 (2010 edition) are subject to 6-monthly inspection by appointed government inspectors. All violations are subject to criminal action.
Blah blah blah and so on.
Half a PC, philosophically, must ipso facto half not be. But half the PC has got to be, vis-à-vis its entity - d'you see? But can a PC be said to be or not to be an entire PC when half the PC is not a PC, due to some ancient history?
Sinclair tried this too, about 22 years ago with the ill-fated PC200. At least this new Commodore's specs aren't obsolete 5 years before it launches (assuming it's not vapor)
"If there's more than a hundred Polaroid users in the world today, I'd be utterly amazed"
Well hold on to your socks there big lad, because they're about to be blown clean off. Complete, utter and total amazement is just a Flickr search away.
Polaroid related groups on Flickr:
Polaroid
14,275 members | 174,183 photos
POLAROID EDGE
4,526 members | 66,722 photos
Polaroid SX 70
5,508 members | 62,923 photos
polaroid love *
3,169 members | 43,671 photos
polaroid photograph
2,249 members | 39,382 photos
No doubt there's a ton of overlap between the smaller groups and the larger ones, but still that's just a smidge more than 100 users, innit?
That's a clever solution from the point of view of an engineer (it appeals to me on those grounds), but impractical for cost reasons and about the polar opposite of what the target market would want anyway.
I'm not sure what a sensor the size of a Polaroid's picture area would cost, but I'm sure the amount of money involved to break even on one of those would buy you a metric assload of 8-frame film packs even at $21 each.
The cheapest digital medium format rigs retail for 5-figure sums, and they aren't even "full frame" sized compared to 120 film.
“Thanks for the good times IE6"
Yeah, IE6, thanks for all those fun awesome times spent trying to get websites which work perfectly on every other browser to work in your stinking rotten sorry-ass worthless rendering engine. It's not as if I was planning to do something *useful* with that time I'll never get back, you utter, utter bastard.
PS. Where's the grave site? I feel like dancing on it.
Yeah, digital data has such awesome longevity compared to words carved into solid granite or marble, doesn't it? Those ProWrite files I have on Amiga-formatted floppies are SOOOO much easier to read than the inscription on my granny's headstone which dates to about the same time period. Digital makes everything BETTER!
Actually the problem this solves, and solves quite effectively, is that age old one: how to separate fools from their money more quickly.
Count me in the "I'd rather be using Vim" crowd. I develop Coldfusion for a living, and used Dreamweaver initially. Lots of money for a truly hateful tool, which seemed to get slower and slower as time went by.
Tried Eclipse. Really wanted to like it. Too slow. The time saved by the various time saving features I would use a few times per day was outweighed by the time spent waiting for basic, mundane things which happened all the time (like, uh, editing source code) to happen. I don't consider hardware upgrades to be a good solution to inefficient software.
Reverted back to my Unix sysadmin days and installed GVim. I'm happy again.
Seriously. Can we have some of these too?
I don't want a high-priced jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none device which combines a crappy phone with a crappy camera and half-assed attempt at being a full-featured computer and requires charging twice a day even when you don't make a call.
I want a phone which works properly as a phone and has a decent interface for texting, is rugged enough to survive being generally abused over its 2-3 year lifespan, and if I do happen to accidentally drop it in the toilet/drive over it/lose it down a ravine it's going to cost the same to replace as a couple of months of cellphone insurance would anyway.
...never, ever trust an installer package. Assume that they'll try to do something you'd rather they didn't.
There's some good free-as-in-beer software for Windows, Foxit being an example. But you do have to treat it all with some suspicion. Use the custom install options and carefully examine what the installer is about to do. "Typical install" + blindly clicking on "Next" will catch you out.
Hell, even Sun's Java installer/updater tries to force the Yahoo toolbar on you these days.
I know they're just trying to earn some affiliate money, but I'll be tarred and feathered before they earn it by screwing with my computer!
Like all the other major software companies, they seem far too obsessed with squeezing a constant stream of fancy-ass new features into Reader and Flash to bother with such distractions as security or reliability.
But they really need to do what you said. Product bling and spokesperson spin aren't going to cut it any more, time for Adobe to focus on fixing their problems. I just don't see them being willing to do that.
Hypocrite: someone who believes it's OK to do something, but only if they're the ones doing it. See "Jobs, Steve". Also see "free market", "competition" and "don't be evil".
Though I do agree fully on his assessment of Google's company motto. Large corporations are evil by nature, for Google to pretend otherwise is, well...evil!
I tend to agree. Flash certainly has its uses, just a pity that most of the time those aren't the uses it gets put to.
Sites done entirely in flash and sites strewn with annoying CPU crunching bandwidth sucking flash-based ads make me want to vomit then drop my pants and crap on my own vomit. Or run flashblock, which is significantly easier albeit not quite as satisfying.
Somehow though I doubt the iPad will do much to reduce Flash abuse.
I felt the same way, until the last time I traveled with my employer who made the observation that she does that all the time; she takes an empty bottle in her hand luggage and fills it at the convenient drinking fountains located next to the lavs beside the boarding gate.
Sure enough, I tried this and wasn't dragged off for a beating and internal examination by armed thugs masquerading as security. They even let the deadly bottled H2O board the plane with me. Is it wrong that I feel just a teeny bit subversive for pulling off such a heist?
Of course that does assume the greedy buggers haven't taken out all the drinking fountains so as to force you to buy your water at vastly inflated prices. It also assumes the water is safe to drink.
Paying subscribers tend to be as rare as hens teeth on Teh Internets, unless you're providing truly unique content which is not available elsewhere. Which more than likely means you're operating in some narrow niche which isn't served by anyone else anyway.
General/tech news sites aren't likely to survive long behind a paywall. Even one as entertaining as the Register. Not when you have 1000 other sites providing the same basic information in some form or other.
On the flipside people who actively block web advertising are really pretty uncommon and I bet half of those wouldn't bother blocking ads at all if the damn things weren't so obnoxious and in your face so much of the time.
"It's taken 17 years for this vulnerability to be found."
You forgot the punchline - "... by someone who wanted Microsoft to fix it. Which they still haven't done after, oh, like half a year. But what's half a year compared to 17 years really?"
"Doesn't it strike you that, if the vuln's being pointed out are in 17 year old code, that the *new* code is maybe not so bad ?"
That's the best laugh I've had all week!
More likely people were too busy pointing out or exploiting the many, many, many flaws in the newer code to notice a gaping hole in some mostly pointless prehistoric subsystem.
Is that they are Microsoft, with all the baggage and bad karma that implies.
They already dominated the PC industry by the time enough people realized they were untrustworthy sharks and dangerous to do business with. If you want to operate in the PC market, you have little choice but to do business with them, even though you know very well what that means.
OTOH, the big players in mobile tech have the advantage of getting to see Microsoft for what they are before they got trapped into involvement with them. Microsoft aren't the big fish in that class of OS and thus don't have the leverage to make handset manufacturers do their bidding like they can in the PC market.
Which means they have to compete on (gasp!) quality and innovation, two things which their dominant position on the desktop has made them sloppy about.
Really, just WTF?
But while I'm here, a stab at Gus' character profile:
"Gus is always going on about saving energy and how global warming is killing dolphins and stuff. He drives a Prius, very slowly, followed everywhere by an enormous cloud of smug (but conveniently ignores the stupendous amounts of energy and weird chemicals required to build the bloody thing).
"Nobody invites him to parties because he's a boring bastard who talks incessantly about the environment, making you wish an asteroid would destroy all life on earth out of spite. Blake urinates in his chai tea when his back is turned, in revenge for the constant lecturing about being a big old energy hog.
"Gus likes puppy dogs and cute kittens and dolphins, and as a result is lucky in love, having a series of flings with assorted PETA-supporting supermodels. Which just makes him even more annoyingly smug."
Maybe you've heard the saying "no matter how hot she/he is, someone, somewhere, is sick of their shit"? You can bet your (presumably lardy) ass that applies to just about everyone on that site.
Sadly most of them will just never get why they can't hold down a relationship (clue: two shallow self-absorbed narcissists does not a stable relationship make), while a supposed "nottie" like me can be very happily married and even better, not worried about what might happen to that relationship when my looks fade.
"the small number of listeners who were offended" - says it all really, probably a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the listeners, unless they have *really* lousy ratings.
I'm with the DJ on this one. Never had much interest in what HRH had to say on Christmas Day anyway and I don't miss it one bit now that I'm ex-UK. I always found it dry, boring and more than a little condescending ("annus horribilis"? Is that supposed to be Posh for "badass"? Plus we hardly need a monarch to tell us it's been a good or bad year for the country anyway, I think most peons, even the ones who read the Sun, can figure that out without the Queen's help.)
Face it, the only reason to keep the Royal Family on the national payroll is because they're a great tourist attraction, especially where 'Merkins are involved.