Re: they have a responsibility...
... to their management to ensure ad clicks appear bona fide so customers don't complain.
FTFY!
4141 publicly visible posts • joined 11 May 2007
Can't help thinking it'd be better if you had a slider to set the percentage of ads it clicked. Google'll spot that you're clicking every ad pretty quickly (in fact I'm surprised they killed the add-on and didn't just ignore the clicks) whereas if you were to click 0.2% of them you'd look more like a normal user.
Surely that'd do more damage to their business in the long term, it'd be much trickier to pick the fake clicks out of the real ones.
This doesn't seem quite right. Surely the advertisers are the ones losing money, Google still get paid. So while their bottom line may be impacted in the long term in the short to medium they're quids in.
The question is how much will the fake click trail confuse their behavioural targetting, and how long will it take for the fake clicks to impact the effectiveness of the ad campaigns?
Nevertheless, now I know about AdNauseum I think I'll be changing from UBlock.....
Because they have something to debug and need to see how it behaves it on the most popular browser. IMO the Chrome debugger is better than the firefox one for general web dev anyway.
It's not my daily browser but when I'm working in JS Chrome is my default debugger.
It's perfectly possible to exploit people without them being aware that that is what's happening. How many of those doing work for Wikipedia for nothing, on the basis that's it's a charitable organisation, are aware of exactly how big a cash pile the organisation is sitting on? They're giving their time to what they believe is a charitable, knowledge sharing organisation, not Jimbo's massive yacht fund.
>>The polymer in virtually all of the world’s plastic bills is made by a single Australian company, Innovia Security.
Innovia are the makers of Guardian, a substrate used to manufacture the polymer currency of 24 countries, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico and New Zealand.
Tallow does not appear to be a stand-alone or critical ingredient in Guardian, but the by-product got into the substrate because it is used in processing by Innovia’s resin suppliers.<<
So it's in there accidentally by the sound of it. As such probably not going to involve masses of retesting to take it out.
Or maybe it's that people are more likely to sign something that they think might make a difference? If enough people complain about the tallow they'll find an animal free alternative, it's not like it's fundamental to the money making process.
See how far complaining about RIPA gets you......
They think that we'd stop breeding animals for food and dairy and the population would die out. They think that being born to live your life in a cage and then be killed isn't worth it. They think that a smaller population of animals living naturally is better than a massive population living in misery.
Fuck sake. Do none of you know any vegans at all? It's not that obscure a lifestyle choice.
It's perfectly possible to get shoes and wallets that don't involve animal products. Many people do. There's no sensible reason for using animal fat when making money, and a lot of ethical vegetarians would be equally outraged. You don't have to be vegan to think that unnecessary cruelty should be avoided.
Who the fuck thinks "I'm making a more robust form of currency, what that needs is some dripping"?
All through Obabma's presidency he's been blocked and campaigned against by his opponents. Why would you think the same won't happen to Trump? Democracy doesn't stop after an election and people who are opposed to racism and sexism (snowflakes) aren't going to change their minds because of the president.
Get used to it.
jake linked to this article http://hmarco.org/bugs/CVE-2016-4484/CVE-2016-4484_cryptsetup_initrd_shell.html
As it points out in the section marked Impact there may be other unencrypted partitions attached to the system, the hacker could compromise the boot partition for later exploitation, the encrypted disk could be copied for brute forcing at a later date or the attacker could just blat the encrypted disk.
No, but another big problem with IE 6 was sites that only rendered properly on IE 6 because that was all they targetted. A lot of developers these days think supporting Chrome is enough. I was on a site yesterday that had a form on it that didn't' work on Firefox (cursor moved but no text appeared as I typed). It worked fine in Chrome though.
It's a slippery slope, the more sites that are like that the more users will think that the only browser that isn't broken is Chrome....
I don't think so. A lot of people use Google to search. When Chrome came out Google pushed it hard on their search pages. A lot of people clicked on the "Make the internet better" link because they thought it would make the internet better, not because they were making an informed choice about which browser to use.
From a user perspective it's a good browser, from a developer perspective it's probably the best, from a security perspective it's dubious.
Agile can work very well for business level stuff, certainly compared to old fashioned development practices. If I can write javascript that compromises the device it runs on that's a problem with the javascript implementation on that device, not my code. Of course I may do stupid things like send passwords in plain text, but that's not the sort of hack we're talking about here.
IT is too big a subject to expect every business dev to understand all the low level stuff. Likewise you probably don't want coders who are shit hot at device drivers designing and implementing client apps. Horses for courses.
No, it wouldn't, because a lot of users would just use what was on the phone when they got it.
Android should have to have a choice screen for each bundled app listing some popular alternatives (and a few left field ones no-ones ever heard of). Sauce for the goose and all that....
It's no surprise most manufacturers don't give a toss about other OS users.
When they fix something the response is "It should never have been broken in the first place".
Be interesting to see whether Lenovo get more sales after this, or whether they've just pissed money away on a group of people that are never going to buy their products.
This had nothing to do with technical ability, it was about someone dressing too smartly for the cool kids and being a briefcase wanker.
If I can write solid code and communicate effectively with the people I need to why the fuck should I have to dress like you?
But looking into it it seems they're saying they can store executable code (though limited to 255 bytes in length according to the MS docs) as a string in an atom table. They probably should be able to do this, shouldn't they? How could the atom table code tell if the bytes make up a string or an executable?
The issue seems to be that applications can read those strings and then be tricked into executing them. That's applications that trust their input too much. The idea that the atom tables are at fault because they're the source of that input seems a bit weird.
When you go to retrieve a string that someone else wrote you should validate it. You certainly shouldn't execute it. Wherever it comes from.