Re: inane perpetual ramblings about both Trump and Brexit
When sensible people see stupidity it's their duty to point it out.
4141 publicly visible posts • joined 11 May 2007
Also notice how the evil MS aren't wasting their time picking holes in Chrome, they seem happy to let any vulnerabilities in Chrome persist.
Is that because they've now risen above this petty point scoring? Or because they know there are some humdingers in there and they're waiting for the shit to hit the fan.....?
Your post doesn't consider the effect that this targeting has on people who aren't in a gang. If you're an normal black man why should you have to put up with being stopped all the time?
Most gang members are between 5 foot 10 and six foot. I'd you were 5'11" would you be happy to be stopped and searched every couple of weeks? Would a spreadsheet of gang members that just contained everyone of that height be acceptable to you? Sounds as ridiculous as this racist one to me...
I disagree. Bad, error filled documentation is worse than no documentation. With no documentation you see how the thing behaves and treat it accordingly. With bad documentation you assume you've done something wrong and spend ages trying to get it to work.
Neither situation is ideal, obviously, but I prefer working it out over reading instructions that are wrong.
You have to judge that in comparison to the reaction TSB customers are having at the moment. Being told you can't log in, then getting in a minute later and everything being fine is no big deal for most people most of the time. Compared to this balls-up it's clearly a better system.
I prefer to be mildly irritated rather than unable to access any of my money.
The hashing runs on the server. You have to pass the password to the server for hashing. The alternative is to trust all the external devices to hash for you. You can't trust all the external devices.
That's about the size of it, afaik.
Inciting violence is against the law. GoDaddy aren't in a position to prosecute, they're not the state. They are in a position to hold users to their terms of service and are perfectly within their rights to terminate service to users who don't stick to those terms.
Free speech doesn't mean we all have to promote hateful views. Free speech means we have the right to not promote those views.
Yeah, it's one of two things. It's either effectively anonymised and effectively worthless (oh, a list of geographic points with no connections between them or times attached? Useless) or not effectively anonymised and valuable. As soon as patterns become visible they can be mapped to real life and the anonymisation is compromised.
There's articles on here all the time about boffins sticking so called "anonymised" data back together.
Good choice of words. Their business model is based on being able to monetise content on their site without taking responsibility for paying the creators. If the most popular video site on the planet can't work out a way to make money then clearly the business model is fucked.
Any business can be profitable if it doesn't pay it's suppliers. It's not a viable model for long term success.
No. You're lucky if their catalogue covers everything you need but they definitely do not have every track released. I've got loads of commercially released music that isn't streamable on Spotify (unless it's drastically changed in the last year) from 80s vinyl right through to current Asian music.
My mate comes round every 6 months or so. I play him music on youtube, he uses a spotify playlist he's built up since his last visit. One in five or so of the tunes he's listed won't be available when he goes to stream it. Not popular enough for Spotify to keep paying to host them. They'll be on youtube with about 200 views.
I prefer a music collection where tunes don't just disappear after a while so I have an SD card full of mp3s.
The question is whether they are at the top because they get clicked or the get clicked because they're at the top. It's plausible that Google's been promoting Wikipedia for 10 years and that's why it's always at the top. It's also plausible that everyone knows what Wikipedia is search for it on their own.
Assuming that there's nothing dodgy going on is great for Google. I'd rather they weren't both the biggest web advertiser and biggest gateway to the web. The fact they could manipulate their search product to guide people towards sites that are profitable for their ad business should make anyone suspicious.
It's a great solution, provided you don't mind the rigmarole of whitelisting a bunch of sites every time you visit somewhere new...
Non-Facebook users shouldn't have to do anything at all to avoid being tracked.
Who's going to cause a fuss about this if the people who understand the issues just use a plug in and leave everyone else to be spyed on?
Saucy! I do understand, like I understand that "Shouldn't of" is becoming common, and the ridiculous "step foot". (Don't hear many people saying "punch fist" or "run leg" though.....)
The problem I have with this use of Curate's egg is it takes a phrase that has a pretty unique meaning and turns it into "mixed bag", "Six of one, half a dozen of the other" etc.... We have loads of phrases for "sort of ok", we don't need another one!!!
Why do things have to keep changing??????
The curate's egg is bad. He say's it has some good bits. He's a sycophantic liar, bad eggs don't have good bits.
So either this article is full of lies and the camera is useless or the author is using a turn of phrase they don't really understand.
... is allowed to set its own taxes
No it isn't. It's about whether a company can do business in one country and claim that it's taken place in another country where tax is lower. The protesters want sales in France to be subject to France's tax laws.
Is it because they're not back porting the fixes to versions of linux that are 15 years old and architected differently? Is it MS's insistence on supporting old pcs, peripherals and software where Linux doesn't (afaik)?
If you ran windows like you run Linux, installing all the updates offered, you'd be on 10 by now and not having these legacy problems.
"Classifying this group of gutter dwelling, bottom feeding, shallow end of the gene pool upright mammals as Human is somewhat alarming."
"Bolshevism is the declaration of war by Jewish-led international subhumans against culture itself". ref
So why is the comparison invalid? Because it's a cliche?