Re: It's also a lot more vague. "Everything has a location and a default handler" is pretty generic.
Rather than being explicitly wrong and saying everything's a file? The more generic the better, surely?
4141 publicly visible posts • joined 11 May 2007
Why are people running the old one?
If this is ms pushing people to ms products why have they only broken the old one?
My first thought was "they've spotted a bug in the old version and want to push you to update.". Should i be more paranoid? The conspiracy theories are certainly more fun....
No herman. no.
What happened was we were told a deal would be a piece of piss. Then the people who told us that a deal would be a piece of piss wouldn't support the deal that their party got. Then they started pretending that if we don't have a deal by Oct 31st we won't have to get a deal.
We still have to deal with the EU.
If we leave without ratifying the deal we brokered the EU will be even less amenable to our bullshit and bluster.
BoJo's rich buddies have bet millions on us crashing out. They stand to make a pretty penny picking over the wreckage of UK businesses.
And here you are, throwing a chidish tantrum, pretending that the reasoned judgement presented yesterday was unfair and undemocratic.
Grow up.
How can you type "five weeks" repeatedly in the first paragraph yet have fogotten completely about the length of the proroguation by paragraph 2?
You twist and turn like a twisty turny thing, but you can't spin this as "the judges have taken over", however much you try. The verdict is "Go to parliament and govern" not "Govern as we tell you".
No it doesn't. It makes the proroguing illegal and means parliament hasn't been shut down. That's not the court telling Parliament anything other than "Do your job".
You don't want that to happen? You think if Jezza is the next pm he should be able to shut down parliament while he privatises whatever he likes?
Bollocks. A moral software engineer wouldn't write either routine.
The engineer who wrote the one that takes a cityId has done a better job of engineering it but it's arguably less moral.
It wouldn't necessarily target the French.
I know they're related. I know they're not the same thing. It's fine for the state to administer justice. It's not fine for the state to administer revenge.
There's no need to be patronising, particularly when your point is so feeble and you've no idea how old I am.
No one advised me. I looked at how much I was making, it was twice what I was earning as a permie and the work was easier. I was quite happy contributing a bigger wedge of tax cos I was taking home more than enough.
You lot really are just greedy. That's all it comes down to. People with plenty of money desperate for more.
I think you've been badly advised.
You decided to work for a company you set up that doesn't give you any employment rights. You think that means that you shouldn't contribute the same as other workers.
Where I disagree is with "without the individual being an employee of the other". We both know that most of the time that's exactly what you are, you'd just like to arrange it legally so you can make shit loads of money.
I can see there is an issue there. I don't think it's important. At all.
It's the right who try and equate illegal hate speech with free speech. Freedom of speech isn't freedom from consequence.
Besides which, from Trump and his hispanic rapists to BoJo's letterbox women the right aren't being silenced, their stupid, baseless hate is more readily available than it's ever been.
You can burn gas under a pot or you can burn gas in a power station, convert it to electricity, ship the electricity to a house and then turn it back into heat to heat a pot.
How can the second ever be as efficient as the first, however good the final "electricity to heat" conversion is?