Re: IR35 hasn't 'just come in'
I didn't say that. I said "IR35 came in". The question was "did something change that makes people more exposed now than at any time before?" 20 years is covered by "at any time before".
Highly technical my arse.
4140 publicly visible posts • joined 11 May 2007
Yeah, IR35 came in, then loads of umbrella companies sprang up to fleece contractors who were trying to comply with the law.
These new companies wouldn't have lasted five minutes before IR35, everyone was working for themselves for a salary of £10,000 on a business with a turnover of £250,000 (with appropriate profit related dividends to the single director at the end of year of course). Why be an employee of an umbrella when you can be a director of a thriving business?
Why the government wanted to put a stop to that I can't fathom, sounds about as Tory as you can get.
Why would you think that comment was a sensible start to a discussion about government and tech giants?
If I didn't know better I'd think it was a deliberate attempt to derail the conversation by getting the nerds to talk tech instead of politics.
If it also happens to be a con trick that doesn't invalidate it as an artwork. In fact, isn't that part of the work?
All works of art are objectively pointless, or at least the art bit of them is. A picture of a haywain can cover a stain on the wall but not because it's a picture of a haywain, because it's a square of canvas.
And the disbelieving comments are a lovely extension of the work, nudging it slightly towards reality.
Smashing!
And I bet the users of that don't have the problems that the MS users have.
MS have fucked up by pushing this out instead of letting people opt in, but the fact that Google docs uses this style of comments without raising a pitchfork wielding mob makes it clear that it's not what they've done that's the problem, it's how they've done it.
This is why you should be more concerned about Google. They get away with this shit all the time.
A nice comparison, but MS of 20 years ago didn't have a tenth of the surveilance capability that Google do. They might have been sniffing around your work pc and your home pc but they weren't watching you communicate with your mates, they weren't following you around the country, they didn't have diagnostic widgets installed on pretty much every website you visit.
MS have always focussed on the bottom line, that means selling stuff. Google are a much greater threat than MS ever were. They've realised that if you give stuff away you can make it do whatever you like and the punters will lap it up.
You miss the fundamental problem. There's an imbalance in open source software between those who do the work for fuck all and those who are making billions out of it.
You solution to that seems to be "hope the billionaires will start to spread the wealth around".
Good luck with that.
"I installed this extension to use DuckDuckGo and it made my browser use DuckDuckGo until I uninstalled it. I am outraged by my inability to understand that other search engines don't respect my privacy. Please remove this add-in as it stops people sharing their data with Google"
Something along those lines?
Claims that the FBI are behind it: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/justice-department-announces-court-authorized-effort-disrupt-exploitation-microsoft
But presumably not when they are "neurologically atypical, consistent with past self-characterization as borderline autistic."
Yeah, please go on shouting your support for this man. It makes it very clear where you stand on a lot of issues.