Snowflake has declined the opportunity to take part in this article.
Bunch of Snowflakes!
4141 publicly visible posts • joined 11 May 2007
They do this to get paid.
Ad companies don't pay out if you tell them "We showed 1000 ads and got 10 clicks"
You have to prove you got the clicks to get paid.
I'm not saying this is ethical, but that's how this business works.
Google is the most popular search engine. Use it from a browser that isn't Chrome and you'll get told the right way to use it is in Chrome. A lot of people trust that info and click the download link at the top of their search results.
No, that's not monopoly abuse, it's clever marketing!
Really? Where's the data that supports that argument?
All the data I see shows there's only country that keeps having school massacres. All the other countries that had one took real steps to avoid having another.
The USA likes school massacres more than it likes the idea of losing access to firearms.
You sick fucks.
but these days it's a pain/impossible to pull the battery out of these devices so a functioning OFF button should be provided. You know, for when I, as the device owner and user, want to switch it off?
A simple "No features of this device work when OFF " message would explain the issue and allow the user to make a choice.
You're missing out mate! I see these advertised on the TV, it's a magic app that makes your stuff nicer!!! Says some stuff about "credit ratings" that I don't understand but then a shit car is replaced by a nicer car which is then replaced by an even better car that doesn't even need a child seat in it!! All for free from an app.
I'm glad we have these fantastic services in the UK!
Why are you jealous of this walking shit stain? The fact that everyone thinks what he's done is amazing is the biggest problem we have.
Until we stop this pathetic worship of the greediest fuck nuggets on the planet the climate is fucked.
(Yeah, of course I'm just jealous, because EVERYONE is chasing the cash, right?)
Except, clearly there is.
Tons of waffle explaining why it's fine that kids are starving while this rich fuck hoards capital.
The system favours the rich. You going in to great detail explaining why that is logical is called "Stockhausen Syndrome".
It's clear to see to anyone who looks that the system has favoured the wealthy for so long that it's basically not fit for purpose.
But you go on defending the status quo. You've only got a few years before the floods make all this irrelevant anyway, eh? Not like we could stop global warming, that would require a global change in behaviour.
Like we had a couple of years ago for Covid. Remember, all the city dwellers realising there were mountains a couple of miles away?
No, we must worship the greedy and feckless because a massive system of rules set up to keep them rich is keeping them rich.
Time to wake up. Try and do it before the planet starts to burn, eh?
...that lets me say I'm prepared to pay say 2% more to cover better benefits
You were replying to a comment that finished with: "Bezos does not agree even though he has enough money to double the salary of all his employees and he wouldn't even notice."
There is no shortage of money at Amazon, they can afford to pay people fairly. The fact they don't is not connected to cost.
I find that in most things if you want better quality then it costs more. A £10 bottle of whiskey vs a £30 one, a £150 phone vs a £500 one, often the more expensive one is the better quality one.
How do you think it works?