Re: Sounds like a job for...
Please don't swear like that. I can put up with terms like frigging felching bollock-fucked motherfister, but not that.
4578 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jul 2009
Take a bag, throw a loan of magnets into the bag, shake. Notice the magnets all arrange themselves clumped together. Their poles equally can repel and attract, but the force organizes itself to always attract.
There's one fatal flaw in your assumption of a net clumping force: it doesn't exist.
When you put the magnets in a pile (or a bag) some opposite poles will be close enough by chance to attract and stick together; some matching poles will be close enough to repel and that might perhaps move one or both magnets to a point where attraction to another magnet occurs.
By shaking the bag you are providing extra energy the magnets can effectively use to organise themselves -- you're shuffling them around so even at random more opposite poles have the chance to come into contact and connect two magnets together.
If you shook the bag very, very hard the kinetic energy you provided might be enough to overcome the attraction between connected magnets, forcing them through impact to separate. If the bag tears some will have the opportunity to fly apart and never be forced into connecting up again.
Ergo, all your theorising about gravity is just bollocks.
#1 Can you find me TWO of these "quiescent black holes", that are interacting strongly (black hole to black hole), and yet have very weak interaction with surrounding matter?
Unless and until you can find that your hypothesis remains unsupported. What observations did you use to generate your hypothesis?
Actually, don't bother answering that. I've dealt with arse-about-face Electric Universe nutters before. They never give a straight answer.
but isn't the bottom line still we haven't the faintest idea what gravity really is ?
No. We do have a pretty good idea, tested by observation of its predictions and its utility in the development of technologies such as GPS. Have you heard of a bloke called Einstein?
(and I wouldn't be surprised if they started to put it into place in the Bush years)
This all goes back to Admiral John Poindexter's Total Information Awareness program of 2003. The fact that it got rejected in its totality by Congress hasn't stopped the NSA and others from putting into place pretty much all of the separate elements. They only need to wait for the next large-scale terrorist atrocity and the terrified Congresscritters will fund the final piece that brings it all together.
"earworn wearables"
How long before this becomes "earables"?
Apple's liberal use of alcohol-resistant adhesives
Maybe some far-sighted employee reckoned that the damn things were all too likely to fall out in the pub.
(Give it 20 minutes and Apple's PR bureau will be all over that one.)
Microsoft claimed only that "we're being responsive to our customers who have requested this capability", adding that "organizations can rely on their own internal policies, procedures and communications to ensure that those individuals making self-service purchases are complying with company policies".
Customers will also request that their password be made the same as their house number and be automatically updated if they move home. Just because a bunch of people request something doesn't make it a good idea, especially if it's a bunch of people who may very well have a narrow understanding of the situation and no concept of the implications. Bad Microsoft. Go sit on the naughty step -- and don't fidget!
Like a jewellery heist?
The high point of professionalism is for someone whose grandparents probably haven't yet been born to see your code still running in 81 years' time, against all rational expectation, and marvel that the author was far-sighted enough to ensure that they wouldn't be creating problems for their successors even when half a century in the grave.
I think it was more a case of the sorting offices in Central London being closed. Moving them out to the perimeter allowed larger and more modern ones to be built and gave improved access to the rest of the country, both via the rail network and by road. The lorry engines would have been more energy efficient doing 60mph on a motorway rather than chugging at 12-30mph across town.
Wasn't it the Conservatives that introduced and repeatedly raised the minimum wage?
No, it wasn't. The minimum wage was introduced in 1998, with the Tories voting against it and screaming that it would be the death of business. When virtually no effect was seen on business or inflation (except for more people having more money to spend, which is usually good for business rather than most of it staying in the hands of the few, who tend to squirrel it away offshore or buy another luxury yacht), the Tories confined themselves to voting against minimum wage increases. Consequently it fell behind what was considered to be a living wage and was topped up by working tax credits. When the Tories finally got into power they realised they had to raise the minimum wage to be able to cut the social security bill, so they made a song and dance about wanting to pay the living wage and finally stopped complaining about the minimum wage being increased. Miraculously, though, the minimum wage has stayed about a pound an hour behind the living wage for the last nine years.
They've spent more time doing "real jobs" than any of the shower in Parliament
Just to pick one name which has been in the news this year, Sarah Wollaston practised medicine for 34 years before entering Parliament. That's longer than the total number of years of non-ceremonial military service accumulated by the people you mention.