Re: Couldn't happen now?
Perhaps there were more than 256 parameters for each entry, which is the column limit for Excel2003?
2156 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Jul 2009
> Excel is the real software that all companies, big and small, run on.
It can work nicely in inappropriate functions. I once simulated an entire mobile phone network in it, without resorting to macros/custom functions/plugins and came up with reasonably similar numbers to a horridly complex C++ simulator.
YMMV, obvs, and the example of Track & Trace running out of cols/rows is a complete shit-show
Yes, it's rather droll that USians have to pay income tax on earnings abroad that presumably never touch US soil, but apply that thought to US companies (e.g. Apple with ~$200Bn abroad)? Never, perish the thought.
Surely with McAfee's wealth he could make a new McAfee Inc to hold all his cash abroad and be immune to this, employing Trumps accountants to certify that haircuts and other living expenses are actually tax deductable, so that they can't come after him that way? It costs <£100 to register in the UK, and I'm guessing similar order of magnitude elsewhere, so it probably makes financial (if not ethical) sense...
I have two issues with it, both probably surmountable, but I don't think much thought has been given to them yet:
a) blurring the lines between work and home - for sure, some folks will goof off (I sit @home writing this during work hours, natch), but equally some will end up working longer hours due to it being harder to switch off (e.g. I turn on my work phone and scan emails from APAC region when I get up, and some come in from the US in the evening). It needs to be addressed that in the complete wfh scenario, your work/life balance is managed
b) starting a new job is a bitch, remotely. I've had to redeploy during this time and it is hard to get into a new job when you can't meet people, and there are less of the chance meetings that help you figure out just who does what, or who is a good contact, or even just the brief bits of help that get you "into the groove" with a new role. It will take longer to make an effective employee.
Sure, the IoD will see lots of benefits of wfh - much reduced office/utility bills, no need for an office manager in some cases, and that's all good. I can stand it if Pret goes out of business because fewer people are having their commuter coffee and buying their sandwich lunches on the way to work. Things will change - perhaps small suburban shops will make a comeback as in many places the village/suburban high street has gone. Also, pollution will drop - another plus. But don't expect it to be plain sailing...
IIRC, macro code can be used to suppress warnings and errors. Wouldn't be too hard to imagine some bright spark thinking this solves a few problems on importing a new file.
This might do the trick, and gets rid of those pesky "are you sure", "file already exists" type messages. Perhaps also the "file got too many rows or columns" one?
Application.DisplayAlerts = False
> perhaps it's time to start thinking that, maybe, algorithms have a harder time distinguishing black faces because it is an objectively harder problem?
Perhaps it is, but then perhaps people should also stop releasing products that claim to do something, but don't work so well for the people of colour that make up large portions of society in general. Perhaps these algorithms are not yet ready for the prime time and need further work?
Jim not sure I've ever worked for a company that didn't have default credentials on their kit installed in customer premises. The critical issue is how to gain access to the kit to be able to enter credentials. The Huawei kit, in particular the core network infrastructure, will be a server farm with rigourously policed network interfaces. The default is usually to shut everything down except for the explicit ports and routes needed for the kit to provide service. I've had cause to ask an operator to open a route between 2 IPs and it took weeks to authorise and even then they went by the letter of the (possibly clumsily specified) request and only opened it in one direction, necessitating another delay to get the reverse link opened.
> Huawei makes its money selling hardware
No it doesn't. Hardware is (was?) almost given away to get the footprint in the networks - certainly in the access networks. S/w licensing is then their revenue model, as each year 3GPP helpfully come up with new features, bells & whistles (and Gs) that Huawei can charge through the nose to implement in their software and deploy into the networks.
In terms of their development practise - it's "sell it, build it asap, chuck it through the door with minimal testing, let the field engineering/support teams debug it". It's designed and built by very talented people, but it's rushed, and as the old adage goes: "fast, good & cheap - pick any two".
> I'm amused folk are complaining about phoning HMRC
I'm not complaining, just pointing out that 1 day before the final filin deadline for the previous tax year that ended 9 months ago their phone lines get a bit busy.
I'm thankful I've never had a bad experience calling HMRC - sometimes a bit of a queue when I have been close to the wire, but otherwise all good with refreshingly competent staff each time.
I can't beat the 6 hours on hold - 2 is about the most and that was each of Enstroa (v bad utility provider I inherited in a house move that tried to force an account on me before they'd let me attempt to switch) and BT (when applying for a new line for a new build). I no longer have to deal with either of them, thankfully.
> HMRC decided to make everyone do something at the same time
err - well, they decided to make everyone do something *by* the same time, with three-quarters of a year to do it in (even if the first couple of months are difficult as you're waiting for banks to send annual statements of interest, employers to issue P60/P11D's, etc...).
Not sure it's easy to tie everyone's tax return (and presumably their tax year) to an arbitrary date in the year (e.g. birthday) - although in fairness that's what happens for companies.
HMRC on 30th Jan, anyone? Sometimes it's impossible to cater for the demand in this way. Even the supermarkets that say "if there's a queue we'll open a new till" often run out of tills to open - the daily patterns of how people call various organisations make it hard, and Mr Erlang had a formula for working out such things (I suspect there's a lot of back-room "just what will our customers put up with").
My main gripe is against the ones that don't tell you where you are in the queue, at least. It should be standard practice to have a "you are at position N in the queue" so you can estimate whether it's worth your time waiting.
Indeed - I suspect the "destruction of evidence" charge has to come with proof that there was evidence relevant to the case in the first hand. But then if what he wanted to do was conceal evidence of a relationship with Lugovoi, using it as his excuse kinda blows that cover...
Good point - the missile that shot him down (and a Russian MIG pilot) goes to 85000 feet
> It seems like this is some kind of perpetual machine
Err, one that has an input voltage from the solar cells covering it to power control systems and some form of propulsion (2x props, from the looks of the pics) to take it from ground to 70,000 feet and assist in maintaining altitude.
Perhaps it failed in the 90s, but materials science has no doubt come a long way in providing a lightweight airframe from which you can hang a payload of electrical gubbins
It's cyclical - it started with mainframes that grew dumb terminals, then power went to the edge with desktops, then the "cloud" grew and power went back to the core. Next stop - edge-cloud services aka "cloud in a box", perhaps run on the high cores per chip devices when the production volumes make it more accessible for the desktop, but you end up renting VMs for the application you want rather than buying and installing it.
Then it'll somehow migrate personal clouds into a whole, central stormfront of clouds.
Lather, rinse, repeat...
At least:
a) it could be a fasle negative (have at least anecdotal 1st hand evidence of friends who quite clearly had it but actually tested negative)
b) you could still be growing sufficient quantities of the virus inside you to both be asymptomatic and not register a positive *yet*
Data available here:
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-testing
Easy enough to open in Excel and make a pivot chart to highlight a few things:
a) correct, we're currently testing more than Germany and have been for about 20 weeks (looking at the "testing rate" figures - not sure if they're normalised to population as the measurement is not described - but our populations are nominally similar, at least - Ger = 83m vs UK=67m)
b) Context is key. 20 weeks ago, when we started testing more, Germany's "new case" rate had just plunged, and for the previous 4 weeks had been doing at least double what we were doing. The UK "new case" rate was still at its peak
c) Germany, despite having a low case rate, has continued to do lots of testing, and have been doing efficient track & trace for months, now, having had the app deployed by June. Our track and trace system (thanks Serco/Dido) has gloriously failed miserably, and the new system has only just been deployed to a population full of mistrust - I imagine the take up will be a lot lower because of it
So yes, it's a not a "failure", it's a complete cluster-fuck because nothing was put together at an appropriate time. It's all too late. I really had a "don't know whether to laugh or cry" with our clown-in-chief's recent "a stich in time saves nine" quote hitting the Torygraph headlines.
It is a Bluetooth handshake, but it's more accurate to say "within a certain pathloss from the antenna". In open space that may relate to a circle of radius X around the person if they were holding it up over their heads without covering the bt antenna (assuming a decent omnidirectional one), but when it goes in a pocket the circle will deform and contract a bit subject to the propagation of the bt frequency, whatever that might be.
</Pedant mode>
I don't mind using it for age verification, but only when necessary. Apple would like to have a CC for you on file from the second you setup an iDevice, which to me is rather unreasonable. A payment method is only required when actually paying for something, and ID is only required to obtain something that has an age restriction on it. If I'm not doing either of those things, then Apple can bugger off, as far as I'm concerned
Add to which, entering CC details on a form doesn't imply age > 18, just that person entering those details has access to a CC. A few youngsters (<12yo) I'm aware of have "borrowed" an adults card to buy in-game currency. It's been discovered moderately quickly, and amounts got refunded, children sent to re-education camps, but on the whole, entering CC details is no barrier to younger people.
My issue is that the account is not downloading anything, even free stuff, so doesn't need ID. Equally, the younglings account has a dob with it that I have set, so shouldn't be allowed to do anything inconsistent with that without adult intervention anyway.
> Appl makes it astonishingly obnoxious to even download free things without a credit card number on file
Rather oddly, you can't activate family sharing for younglings without one on file, which seems to go against the grain of not wanting aforementioned youngling racking up a large bill on your card (notwithstanding the ability to require approval on all purchases)
upvote for tall screens meaning less interference by onscreen keyboard. Just recently attempted to commission a small-ish phone for my youngest, and one app I installed had some config that was competely unable to be entered as the keyboard covered the area of the dialog for data entry, in particular a country selector to that the app server could be told a phone number to send a text to. Couldn't bypass by entering "+44" in the phone number field, as it defaulted to US and wouldn't accept it
> I can only assume that you're a geneticist.
I'm not, but still haven't come across such tools. Formatting doesn't cut the mustard - sure you can swap from mm/dd/yyyy to dd/mm/yyyy, but if you've already got a date in there it preserves the internal "days since 1/1/1900". If I've accidentally typed 1/3/2020 for first of march but Excel stores it as USian, converting the format to UK will have it read 3/1/2020 when I wanted it to read 1/3/2020.
Functions? Which ones? You could mangle it by extracting day/month/year via the functions of the same name, and then reassemble while swapping day and month around, but that doesn't strike me as elegant (summat like "=date(year(a1),day(a1),month(a1)")
Scripts - sure I could write some VB to do it, but it's only happened enough to annoy me, not regularly enough to warrant making a custom macro that I store and add to spreadsheets when I need to deal with it.
Happy to be told if I've missed something
Where would the post code go? Technically, it identifies your house as one of a small set (usually a dozen or so, but I've seen up to 30 on the same post code - one entire side of a street).
From an ordering perspective, it would then be:
Eng(er)land, London, SW1A 2AA, Downing St, 10, The BBB
>until English becomes the de facto standard language on the planet.
Depending on politics, birth rates and the 4 horsemen, the de facto language may end up being Chinese, Russian, Arabic, Hindi or any number of others
The date stuff will be a clusterfuck until Excel has a tool to swap format without altering the digits in the string displayed. Am fed up from importing a spreadsheet with it set in USian into a UK spreadsheet and it borking the whole lot
Several papers are reporting today that she didn't have diplomatic immunity. Quote from the metro:
The parents of Harry Dunn have been told by the Director of Public Prosecutions that his alleged killer did not have diplomatic immunity when she fled the UK
Not been reported in more reputable sources, but we'll see
Having worked on 3, 4 and now 5G for the last 20 years, I pay no attention to the hype. Headline grabbing data rates are probably theoretical numbers, at the physical layer, and give one mobile the entire cell capacity with perfect transmission. In practice, user experience is about 60-70% of those numbers due to protocol overheads and variability in radio.