Re: Interesting omission
The most interesting omission to me is the one where she says "We're annoyed we never thought of doing all that".
1579 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jun 2009
Based on a quick read of Mr. Mandel's Wikipedia bio, I would say it's a little from column A and a little from column B.
I don't think anyone could be quite as much of a by-the-book Republican as Josh Mandel:
High School quarterback
Marine corps
Biblical literalist
Stridently anti-gay (also looks to me like he's in the closet, but you know: Judge not lest you be judged)
Several (minor) corruption issues
Anti-Iran
It's like he's straight out of central casting.
Honest question here from the colonies.
Why are you not having another referendum? If this Arron Banks really has taken dodgy offshore money and used it in the previous one would the result not be considered questionable?
If the worst happens at least my next trip to the wonderful UK will be a lot cheaper.
So what you're saying is that Foxconn treats it's Chinese workers like slaves, and presumably wants to treat it's new US workers the same way?
Sounds about right.
Anyway, I don't blame the Chinese who don't want to go to Wisconsin. I've been there, and some of the poverty I saw looked more like India than the US. Also, an appalling climate.
That caught me eye too, but the first question I have is: with KDE* available, why does anyone use Gnome?
I mean it's the default desktop in so many popular distros that there must be a good reason, but I can't for the life of me work out what it is.
* Or Budgie, or Cinnamon, or XFCE etc etc...
The bit that jumped out at me was:
"Innovation in aviation has been a hallmark of life and industry in the United States since the Wright brothers first designed gliders in Dayton more than a century ago,”
Which, as we know pretty much killed the aero industry in the US until Mr. & Mr. Wright's patents expired.
Luckily, France (and others) ignored those patents and made aeroplanes.
The US got it's start ignoring the UK's patents, and China is doing similar.
Not that I am condoning theft, merely offering an explanation.
Why don't you just stay away?
I won't have that option, because I live here.
I am intending to take the same attitude, in the unlikely event I am asked to unlock my phone for the customs people.
I will be telling them no, then having my lawyer ask to see their evidence of "prior suspicion" if they decide to fine me.
Five grand is a lot of money, and I'd rather give it to my lawyer.
To be fair to the FCC, it is not the only group in the US government system that spends its time finding new ways to improve corporate profits.
The Pentagon is another one which springs to mind.
For what it's worth, I think AT&T have a point about Verizon's 5g tech also. It has been proved repeatedly that standards are a good thing for everyone. Can anyone remember CDMA?
China is a semi-captive market for Huawei.
I'm not sure about that, but they seem to be really good value for money.
They recently began flooding my country with ads, TV, online, everywhere and they make a compelling case too.
A young lady I work with bought one, it might be the Huawei 3i. It's a nice phone ( for roughly £150) with a good screen, quite fast, and an all right camera (not amazing, but she won't notice).
Not being overly familiar with Sir Clive's personal life I read the Daily Mail piece linked, and couldn't help thinking that the man must be a fool.
Seriously? An IQ of 159 (as if that means something) and marries a former stripper 39 years younger than himself? Makes me wonder how he manages to put his trousers on the right way around.
I wonder how much the big Telcos spend on lobbying the politicians who make the rules?
Turns out it's a lot. Quelle surprise.
What happens when cities decide to provide community internet access?
This is just the US political system working as it is supposed to.
In my career supporting various bits of gear loosely termed "IT" I have thrown away several "smart" whiteboards, due to lack of use.
Everyone seems to think they are a great idea and will make meeting so much more productive. Someone else finds $15,000 or so from the capex budget, and the thing is purchased.
Several years later a third person realises it has been used exactly once and I am called in to take it off the wall and send it to the recyclers.
If you want one, I have one in my store room.
Compared to younger employees, IBM found that Boomers were the least likely to understand IBM’s business strategy,
Just like IBM's customers then.
...and the least likely to understand IBM’s brand.
Or, the least likely to say they understand what that sentence means.
Thanks veti, you're quite right.
I can remember George II having similar moments, with "Mission Accomplished" and "Truthiness".
I am even old enough to remember that odd Mr. Reagan telling us wealth would "Trickle Down" and we all know how well that worked.
It seems the supporters of the American far-right have no problem with being lied to.
@ mathew42
Breaking the dominant, former publically owned incumbant into a network company (Infrastructure) and a retail company is exactly what we did in New Zealand.
I don't think the model is perfect, but it seems to be a hell of a lot better than the mess created in Aus.
We have never had the stupid fibre to the premises or fibre to the whatever debate our Aussie cousins have had to put up with. The infrastructure guys were told to run out fibre and given some money to do it.
End of story.
It was the freetards who broke it for everyone.
I don't agree with that at all.
I blame the copyright owners cartel who have extended the length of their ownership again and again until it has no real end point.
Why, for instance, is Robert Johnson's music still under copyright? He died in 1937 and no-one who had anything to do with his recordings is even alive any more.