Re: Belgacom
The British Military Sat-Comm system is called SkyNet (at least some of those birds are still orbiting)
2513 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jun 2009
"So only those without the filter get to annoy the ISP or read what the government doesn't like. But that doesn't matter, because we've already established that they are all deviants that need kept an eye on."
how do you know they won;t be filtered too? The ISPs could easily have a basic filter that everyone is subject to and then the smut filter that you can opt out of. If someone notices their traffic going through the filter, they could just lie and say that is how the network is blocked; everything goes through that particular piece of equipment.
If he is tired of idiots on the mailing list, then why not just set up a white-list for who can send to it? A lot of projects do this where only a small group is allowed to post to the mailing list but anyone can subscribe to it, in this case, limit the people who can post to it to just the kernel devs themselves and maybe one or two exceptions. And if these idiots are kernel devs, what is he doing letting people like that do such critical work?
But what do I know? I'm just a 'Masturbating Monkey'. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
And what would they do with the data? You could find all the SMTP servers, but you don't know what domains it serves or even if its just an exit server for someone's email system with the entrance being hosted by a third party.
You could do a reverse look-up on the IP address that respond, but you'll only end up with their external host-names so service providers' server wouldn't match what they host. The easier thing to do would be to just query DNS with a big list of domains and setting the type to MX.
International shipping regulations require that ships over a certain tonnage are required to have a full complement of navigational tools (Water-proofed charts, Sextant, compass, star charts,etc) and the captain, first officer and second officer must be trained in their use.
Beside, any captain worth their salt can identify that they are off-course from just the stars or landmarks.
Ohio-class SSBN/SSGN submarines use a combination of CO2 scrubbers and electrolyzed oxygen from the sea-water (Although a lot of that is diverted to the missiles, the crew still get some). There are also emergency compressed air tanks to last for quite a while so a rescue can be effected if the sub loses power (Happens more often than you'd think, just ask the crew of the Kursk)
The Ohio-class is over-kill for its mission, but that's what you get from Cold-war era paranoia matched with the ungodly budget of the US government. To be fair, a lot of technology used for the life support was originally researched for the space program (or maybe it was the other way around)
I think that would depend on who is gathering the air.
NASA: pre-measure everything and get each components to within 5 ppb of what is on the space station, spending millions of dollars for each pound of air
Russia: Take an air compressor and just grab the air outside of the launch facility
Japan: Pump the air out of the vaginas of school girls
Europe: build a facility dreamed up by a fashion designer on top of the Swiss alps to get 'only the freshest, hippest' air.
China: Get a few hundred children to breath into gas canisters and throw some lead or melamine for good measure.
"Except when the network card is broken. Or disconnected. Or misconfigured. Or Boot from LAN is disabled, etc. etc."
In any of those situations, all you;d need is a screw driver, the keyboard or a network cable.
That is utter bullshit, over 10 years of managing a datacenter and I've never needed removable media. I have a network boot server that is just loaded with the DaRT toolkit, WinPE and a bootable OpenBSD install. Anything that can be done with removable media can easily be done with network-based utilities.
The aircraft still has emergency beacons, the ELT is just more accurate than the others. A typical passenger aircraft will have 3 small beacons: 1 in the nose section, another right between the wings, just under the deck plating and one in the tail assembly, some of the bigger planes have more or attached as optional components depending on purpose of the craft.
That all depend on who you are listening to. The Republican party is all about personal responsibility and small government; on the other hand the Democrats are all for the government to protect the people and for a larger government.
Of course this is in theory, in practice its just a colossal cluster-fuck of yelling and mud-slinging.
> eDirectory knock(s/ed) spots off AD years ago quite literally. AD has always been just about good enough for pretty small set ups.
That is why you set up multiple AD servers and use sites properly
> The KCC bollocks annoys me intensely and it doesn't usually work properly without assistance and the speed of convergence is dreadful unless you force it along (yes I do know what I am doing wrt star and fully meshed topologies). It's frankly crap and unnecessary.
The hell are you talking about? Active Directory has no concepts of topologies.
> I see no evidence of multi in and outbound sync, different speeds for different attributes and a woeful lack of built in object types
Stop using Server 2000 and join us in the present
> You have to DNS federate everything.
Your point?
> As for the sheer number of naming attributes for a user object - it's arse.
You know you don't have to use them. They are there for the convenience of developers and admins and provides a handy place to keep user info
>The PDC emulator and the other FSMO things are awful hangovers from the old days.
If you don't use them, they don't do anything. They are there in case you have old systems or Linux boxes that need a PDC. Why are you so opposed to backward compatibility?
> Why the hell do you need a Schema Master thing anyway in this day and age
So you have a server with an 'authoritative' copy of the schema, that the point of it. Anything that is clustered / distributed require such a role
>and why the blazes do you have to register a .DLL to even see the bloody thing in a GUI?
Because you are still using XP, upgrade to an OS that isn't 10 yeas old.
>I'm bored of this - I can't even be bothered to get excited about whinging about AD any more. Yes, its popular but it's still shit.
Wahhh
Yes it does, Actual Windows 8 apps have to either come from the Windows App Store or a System Center server configured by the system Administrator to side-load company apps. Even then with regular programs you still get the UAC prompt showing who signed the code, etc.
Its useful if that domain is unintentionally spewing spam and you need someone to yell at. I also use it to weed out bad domains (EG, of it was registered in the past month, then its unlikely its holding anything worth-while).
I just hope they set up a replacement with this kind of information at least giving out a 'Registered date' and 'Abuse contact' fields. Preferably having a confirmed-working email address for the abuse contact Even better would be 'You don't get an MX record for this domain if you don't validate your email address'.
As far as people getting my registration info, there isn't much I care about in there. someone could spam me all day long on my contact addresses and I don't give a shit.
Just snip the Data(-) and Data(+) wires on the USB Cable, I had an old USB cable that was broken, so I only wired the Power wires back on and my phone charges without problem. Nothing can get in wvia the power lines, so I suppose all my phones are no immune to this.
I run my VDI instances on Server 2012 and give Windows 7 512 MB and allow to expand to 2 GB. I end up running about a dozen or so VMs on a Xeon E5 with 32 GB of RAM and haven't heard any complaints from the office drones that use them.
Hyper-V server 2012 will happily run with only 768 MB of RAM, and will usually only take about 300 MBs when lightly used.
Most aviation accidents happen during either take-off or landing, so they want you focused on the flight crew and what is going on rather than on your tablet and miss out on the "Please remain buckled in your seat and remain calm until the plane comes to a complete crash".
The concern about the electronics interfering with the craft's electronics started because they weren't sure (And devices back then caused orders of magnitude more RF noise than anything today). The warning was then kept as a scare tactic to keep you safe (Nothing convinces people to do something than telling them that fiery death will occur if they do not comply)
Really what they should be doing is telling people that they must remain alert and ready in case an emergency occurs without harping them on powering down their electronics.
They sure do. I have seen it far too often, you get some idjit that believes that Linux server are invulnerable and also thinks that 'chown', 'chmod' and even 'sudo' are deep wizardry and never uses them instead opting to run everything as root.
The most common reason I see is that they installed some extension or library that requires more permissions than what the service account has so rather than sitting down a figuring out how to allow the additional permissions, they just run under root because it works.