Pedantic
Being a bit pedantic here, but the braking distance of a car is not reduced at all by having motors, as the limit is already defined by the tyre/road interaction, assuming both road and suspension are in good condition.
1568 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
As far as I can see, that data is not complete (still very cool), as I cant see data from Iran, Russia, China...
Note:
"FlightAware's primary service area includes airspace operated by the United States (including Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam), Canada, the Caribbean, Australia, New Zealand, portions of Central America, the United Kingdom, and France. Flights in the primary service area support real time maps, departure and arrival information, delays, and more."
So it is missing most of Europe, all of Africa, South america and Asia.
Still, for such a boeing friendly part of the world, it is quite clear that the a320 has beaten the 737.
The reason for this is quite simple: a 320 has less cost per mile per seat than a 737. It is also more silent and has more space.. but that is not the reason it is winning. It is just cost.
Most of the cost could be saved by these.. as no turbines to be inspected or serviced.
And yes, I see this as an alternative to go from/to the jet.
The range is way too short.. how is this thing ever going to be approved? no fuel to go to alternate airport (or 30 mins for a heli)
"[14 CFR 91, §91.167]
(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft in IFR conditions unless it carries enough fuel (considering weather reports and forecasts and weather conditions) to—
(1) Complete the flight to the first airport of intended landing;
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, fly from that airport to the alternate airport; and
(3) Fly after that for 45 minutes at normal cruising speed or, for helicopters, fly after that for 30 minutes at normal cruising speed."
So this can fly for an hour.. and will be restricted to 30 mins max.. I frankly dont see how this could work with existing rules.
I might contribute to the project as I have the electronics skills, and I am also fed up with UPSs, and I know I am not alone.
BUT the problem is that designing the right electronics for modern computers is difficult.. we basically need decent electronics.. and that is expensive.
Read these papers from ABB:
https://library.e.abb.com/public/58f96070ebc547799c3cae35025f1e85/White_Paper_Power_factor_UPS.pdf
https://library.e.abb.com/public/525c273041687f0085257bf3005bbf28/ABB-429-WPO_CyberexDynamicInrushRestraint.pdf
I have seen data centers have fires for not taking these things into account...
So there is no shortage.
It is the same as saying "there is a shortage of milk", yet prices are about 24-30p a litre for the producer.
Shortage, real one, would see prices climbing a lot.
A shortage of nurses, would mean they would earn more than doctors. They don't, therefore there is a shortage "at a set price".
If I complain about a shortage of petrol, and I say I would gladly pay 80p per liter.. yeah... no shortage.. shortage at my set price.
Pay more and give better conditions, and more people will become nurses and/or more ppl will go to the uk.
I'm not an expert but..
No offense, "but" that is the problem. You either have decent (not even good) security or you dont. And if you are going to allow other people to bypass security, it is bad by design.
If we say "yes" we would have your scenario. If we say "no" we would also probably end up in the same scenario, but at least we tried.
You are wrong.
A little drone with a shaped charge CAN take an armored vehicle.. as the top armor is crap.
Look at this:
https://defencyclopedia.com/2015/06/12/cbu-105-sensor-fuzed-weapon-usafs-ultimate-tank-buster/
So what you need is just a single skeet.
http://armamentresearch.com/us-cbu-97cbu-105-sensor-fuzed-weapon-cluster-munition/
Each skeet weights 3,4kg, sensors and power source included.. including some structure to be inside the submunition plus battery.. so I guess you could get a less than 3kg skeet.
Now, many drones are able to lift 3kg... example:
DJI S900
So, with some smart programming and delivery method (truck), lets say 20 of these go and attack a place from low altitude.. no way you can defend your tanks/planes. And the ammo is 40K£ in drones and whatever the skeets cost (I would say another 30K).
that would be at least 10 vehicles destroyed.. for 70k, and without air superiority
I would add proper insulating, and testing for said "insulation", as most insulation only passes "on paper".
A work colleague of mine got his house insulated. I mean, properly insulated.. and this is a new build, but it had crap insulation.
He now only needs a little bit of heat added.. previously the house was colder and he had big gas bills..
Had this been made during construction, the additional cost would have benn what? 1000£? Unacceptable that we allow such building quality to be legal.
I am spanish, so I also know (well, I know better) the spanish legislation.. and in spain, it is mandatory to have the telephone/telco system ready in the building, made by the builder, before anyone can legally move in.
Also, as part of the new zone being build, as the other infrastructure is being built, so is the telco infrastructure. It is considered a basic need, and a mandatory requirement for zoning. No permission otherwise.
Spain has plenty of problems (just look at the news) but not this.
Of, and FTTH in spain is now 600Mbps symmetrical. Now that I would call excesive, but 30?
I have Virgin docsis, and it is ok,
not ultrafast by any means.. and if you want to do any fancy stuff (like online backups, work from home at the same time, etc) it is "adequate, not good", as I have to throttle a lot.. as it is not symmetrical.
A work colleague (admin) lost his job that way many moons ago.
Hethought he was putting my code (well, a version update of the project I lead) into the integration environment.. but put it into production, as he had both terminals open, and made the huge error of pulling from command line. I had told him before to put into the server, and execute from the server.. as a friendly suggestion.
He was lucky in the sense that there were no bugs in the code, so in a sense the systems kept working, unlucky in the sense that this was in the client/server era, so the decision was to push the updated client. 45 minutes down time for 50/100 ppl (dont remember well).
He lost his job for a single mistake in two years, I am still a bit angry about that.
The thing is we all have hands very similar to each other.. so the sizes are going to be from 4.5 to 5.5 and a few bigger and smaller than that, depending on preferences (bigger screen but too big, or the contrary).
There are also a few manufacturers of chipsets, and they all pretty much are the same ARM cores, modified a bit, and a few different GPU cores. Plus the modem/radio, standard tech battery, and you just have some relatively straight forward ancilliaries such as motion sensors, screen driver, NAND, etc. YEs qualities do vary, but not so much (UFS is great, but we wont need anything faster than that).
So yeah, boring days.
The main issues as I see the problem are:
1. Support. today phones are use and throw away. They should point the target towards a car sales type of market, and make most of the money from spares, etc. Just put a validation chip/code in batteries, screens, etc.
2.Wireless desktop. If they provided a wireless desktop/connected to a standard "brainless laptop" you would use the same electronics everywhere, same os. That would encourage ppl to buy more expensive phones, and then mantain them with batteries that have to be bought from the official shop, also the only one that can reseal the unit, etc. Just look and jhon deere and their "DRM everywhere except the oil, and give us time".
I think he means cannot "not breaking the law".
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/03/28/government_tweaks_uk_copyright_law/
There are many many ways of doing it otherwise.
Also, why do they limit netfllix to non HDR 1080p on PC unless you hve very specific hw? It is easier to me to download illegal content than to pay for it!! I do pay, but it is VERY stupid.
He is not in my opinion.
Those that break existing rules should be punished.. and these rules seem to oppress the worker more than anybody else.. and as existing rules are not enforced, why do they need other rules?
Just enforcing current rules or making them possible to be enforced would be enough.
It works.
The main problem I see is that they have only partially updated themselves. They mostly dont want to pay a dime for brand recognition, so they dont pay for "impressions", they just play for clicks.. and that is wrong
As for engaging ads.. well, that is also bad, as they want to engage, yes, but in a bad way, and they are just more subtle spam.
Err no to your first statement, kind of ok with the rest.
In some very precise benchmarks they have 30%. and precisely in those benchmarks the loss is about 17-18% (my own testing, but there are many more in the web).
It is in databases etc that intel shines.. and with Platinum processors at 10.000$ a pop.
i would say that for mainstream server processors AMD makes more sense right now.. who knows in the future. If you use AVX-512 a lot then of course not, but then you are not using it for mainstream uses...
Backblaze explain quite right how it works:
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/save-marketing-money-nice/
So it is not only "Edible Arrangements", it is also "backblaze", a word that whould NOT trigger google to put ads.. in my computer it triggers adds for backblaze (that is stealing sirs), idrive and softwarereviews.
It is using a protected trademark for diluting the term, and it is wrong.