GB
This story brings back memories. Memories of GB not being a very good game. The author was 12. Embarrassingly, I was more like 17. How old were others ?
2047 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jun 2009
Hope China does not turn into another USSR. Or rather, hope it follows the USSR into trying democracy and dismantling itself. Unfortunately China's leaders are addicted to absolute power, the worlds most potent drug. Folks like Assad, Ahmadinejad, kim jong-un will do anything, and commit any crime, to get their supply. We need more Gorbachevs and Mandelas to get us out of this mess.
I have absolutely no evidence to support my hunch that the report which Andrew finds so convincing is in some way sponsored by the retailers.
And the "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)" does not sound like a body interested in public health or anti-social behaviour. It sounds like a body that wants us to buy as much stuff as possible. Wikipedia first sentence: "...founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade...". Prime policy: "to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth..."
Agree with Tom 38 all points, particularly point 1. Access to the cloud, especially through mobile data, is excruciatingly slow. Just "syncing" a single 8MP photo can take forever.
Having your own cloud - like Pogo Plug or your own home brew - is a partial answer, solving points 2,3 and 4. Also cheap on electricity if the backing storage is solid state. Still slow for your mobile devices though, and if the pogo plug is burgled, so is your data.
Good points and I deserved the down votes, but the reason the guy was punished is to discourage others from making "jokes". Example: a real friendly stranger on your plane says he has a bomb, says it like a joke - is he kidding ? If the jokers get off scot free, we won't really know, because a real threat can then be disguised as a joke.
er I think.
I take the common sense argument but everybody who is not dumb knows you never, ever joke about blowing things up. National security ops have to take everything seriously and don't have time to reverse-engineer every statement and analyse its social context. Would you get on a plane and then with a big smile tell the pilot you have bomb on board, nudge nudge ? What do you think the other passengers would then do to you ?
What depresses me is that the authorities are actually listening to every tweet.
Hate idiots on YT but when it comes to Google, we should be using all the false names we can. Anything to slow down their stalking and top-peepery.
Identify yourself on YT and the whole Google machine will explode into life, profiling you, investigating you, desperate to identify and tie together all your online personas, your Gmails, your Android conversations, your GPS locations etc. etc. They are like the Lidless Eye these days, except more evil.
Not sure why you are relying on social media sites to vault your data. Buy a NAS or whatever, keep it in your house. Unfortunately, any format or technology you choose will always have a finite life and will require transcoding to the latest format every few years or decades. Unlike paper.
It's an insoluble problem of digital data. Only analogue is (almost) forever.
I am no drama expert, but I agree BBC drama is poor. The writing is one reason. Actors being presented as celebs is another. Worst of all is the implacable political correctness. Almost every scene is set up to give you a "message", which, apart from being irritating, ruins the scene and makes it entirely predictable. How can any drama survive that ?
For example, one such message is that "women are strong and independent". Nothing too much wrong with that. But the drama is so keen on forcing this message on the viewer that it is written into every available scene. So you have the 7 stone female bank teller who beats up the 16 stone armed robber. Silliness. Yet we see this same scene many times every night, or one like it.
The same message explains why every female character in British drama is the same. In fact there is just one character to go round - it is the same woman. She is bad tempered, overbearing, does no suffer fools and constantly makes the men around her look weak. She turns up in dramas, plays, books, and some films. A girl version of the same character features in many children's books.
Artists must be wriggling under this cosh, but are not free to speak.
Just got my first smartphone this week, an S3. It's colossal, and does not gain any significant internal space thorugh it usage of a mini-SIM. Honestly, I could put my sandwiches in there. Well, a full size SIM anyway.
The next Apple is likely to be even bigger, and yet will require an even smaller "micro" SIM - which, significantly, will not fit any of your other phones and cannot be chopped like a mini-SIM. Net result - you are pwned and millions of perfectly good phones to to landfill.
No! The universal sim card is the consumer's bulwark against any lock-in shenanigans from the telcos and manufacturers. It is the basis of free movement between phones ans networks. If your contract is unfavourable, that's is a different matter.
Maybe Apple hates the way SIMs give power to the consumer but they must not be allowed to dilute it by spreading non-standard interfaces. That can be no engineering reason to change the SIM. Even full size sims are tiny compare to the size of today's smart phones.
This proposal is straight out of the darkest pages of Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is the kind of thing many of our ancestors died to prevent. The function of this black box is very similar to the kind of work performed manually by the character Winston Smith. Appalling. Shame on the Tories, who condemned the proposal while in opposition, only to be come its biggest fans once in power.
Whoever is in government just can't resist spying on every aspect of citizens' lives. The UK should be ashamed.
"...for our own enjoyment we shall... expel...systematically destroy..." etc.
The language in this statement indicates Anonymous are not people of great judgement, but perhaps chippy social inadequates with a weaner problem and alot of suppressed aggression to get of their chests. I imagine they watch the Matrix alot.
Seriously, unilateral and aggressive vigilantism is not an attractive proposition. And proving that somebody is trading illegal images requires you to view those images, thereby breaking the law.
I't absolutely no evidence to support my hunch that the study or it's authors are somehow involved with the fast food industry, one of the most powerful lobby groups in the western world. Much that we see and hear is engineered in this way.
"Jerant and his colleagues, surveying nearly 51,000 Americans of all ages over a period of six years, found that "underweight" BMI was far and away the most dangerous category to be placed in."
Could that be because ill and seriously ill people are often very underweight, for reasons unrelated to eating, and that in a set of 51,000 people a significant number will be in that unfortunate condition ?
Most emphatically content is not king, as a quick look at any TV screen in the world will show. In 2012 we are still watching broadly the same programmes as we did in 1976, except that now they are spread over 50 channels instead of 3. You therefore need some serious kit to sort out the 5% watchable from the guff that fills the remainder of the spectrum.
Features are king because they make the desirable content more accessible. This YouView gets my vote because, in drawing together several powerful functions in an intuitive interface, it makes it easier for us to get to the good stuff.
I'll upgrade because YouView will be smarter and lower maintenance than the existing combination of technologies that amount to a You View equivalent, viz Toppy, MyStuff and WD TV Live. The same will apply to many others who have a different permutation of products.
DIY solutions with MythTV or similar are brilliant, but require a lot of legwork to set up even for tecchies like us. Many of the softwares involved are works in progress, release 0.15 or something like that. Despite being a Linux head, I just don't want to spend 200 hours spread over the next 25 weekends setting up XBMC. I could earn enough cash with those hours to pay for an out-of-the-box solution many times over.
Same here. This one might finally prize the Toppy/Mystuff from my warm sticky hands.
Sugar might be doing another cpc464 by bundling everything in a nice homogeneous package. Not sure why the article is so downcast, the only downer is its slightly too expensive ? Everything else is great, right ?
"they are amateurs with some very dangerous opinions about what causes RF signal modulation and usually no training in proper testing and frequency analysis."
Never met a radio ham personally, but I think the average ham has a electronics degree, a room full of books, many years of experience and some serious intellectual horsepower, besides the ham certification. And if there was no issue with PLT, why would they raise it ?
"...engineer a similar crisis at another bank this week."
The banking sector has deployed so much incompetence recently that there is a danger that their incompetence reserves might run low. Fortunately, they can always borrow some incompetence from another bank. Some people think that banks create incompetence out of nothing but this is not really true. Some chief executives are paid huge bonuses for their incompetence, and...