Tom and Jerry won seven Oscars? Excellent. Fully deserved. It remains the funniest thing to hit the screen ever, anywhere.
4 for Tom and 3 for Jerry ?
2047 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jun 2009
It might be a good idea, if they can keep the politics out of it. But what are the chances of that?
Will it eventually become a badge meaning "this website agrees politically with the people who awarded this badge" ? Given the condition of much of social media, it seems likely. The badge might then become just one more piece of ordinance in the ongoing "culture war".
Many things are better without the addition of politics. Remembrance is one example. If MLT and co can indeed produce something like the Fairtrade mark, and treat it as such, then it might just work.
Twitter's absolutely within their rights- and indeed responsibilities in many localities- to remove accounts without their registered user's permission. It's not YOUR account. It's /their/ network and /their/ account, which you use with /their/ permission. People seem to forget that.
What? Nobody forgets that. Has anyone suggested that Twitter doesn't have the right to delete its own data (user accounts) ?
@Adrian 4
What causes bloat is the use of libraries and frameworks to speed development. Yes, they do speed it - providing they do what you want and you know how to use them. But very often, you're only using a small part of their functionality yet you get a large part of the baggage.
Exactly. "Hello world.c" might contain 2 lines, but how many lines after pre-processing ? 5000 ?
No proof he was killed.
What sort of proof would convince you ? There have been no more videos or statements released by BL and no more has been heard from him. Al Quaida has not denied his death or contradicted the US account. If B-L was still alive, he could simply release a video and thereby securing a massive propagands coup.
The contention that he is alive would require an intricate conspiracy theory. Similar theories would used to claim that almost anyone is still alive. So, his death seems to be as sure as anyone else's.
Speak for yourself. I've used 10 of those and they still don't list the one I hate the most: Lisp. I've used Lisp on two different platforms and... I haven't touched it since 1989...
Yes yes, and I could bore you with my 36 years of programming experience, but won't. We are all experts here. My point was, most survey respondents are likely to have used only 2 or 3 languages to an expert level, and have little or no basis for judging the others. For example, I dislike Python, but having used it for just a couple of months, I am not really qualified to say, because I haven't yet experienced the full benefits of advanced Python.
"I started learning it as a substitute for awk and various horrible shell variants. It was a great replacement for awk because..."
Ditto. It was created as a reporting language, to replace & unify awk, sed, sh, a job it did, and continues to do, splendidly. A system administrators language, not really meant for writing general apps. Perhaps its success was its undong, as it came to be used for CGI in the 90's Internet, then spread to more general applications, which it was never really intended for, despite all the tweaks and OO extensions.
The Stack Overflow survey is a pointless. Of the 16 languages presented, a respondent will have used only about 2. Whatever.
Most of the general public dismissed the HE advice when it changed to recommending the same levels of alchohol for men and women, something which:
- seems to contradict common sense
- contradicted the previous guidelines
- contradicts guidelines other countries.
- has an odour of politics about it.
“DevOps was the inevitable outcome of building and operating the sites that became the web's giants.” As [Shafer] notes, once a website involves “thousands of computers distributed world-wide, you can't just log in and do an upgrade. You can't give a few commands and reload the site. At this scale, automation isn't an option. It's a requirement.”
All customers are not alike. True, a large PaaS or SaaS company might run with an infrastructure like the above. Downtime is somewhat acceptable, and comprehended in SLAs. But what about an air traffic control system, for example, or the CAD systems of an IC manufacturer, or the control systems for a power station, or a trading floor computer, a payroll system, and so on and so on? They all have different characteristics and priorities. Or more accurately: the same priorities, but in a different order.
Isn't Devops most popular in environemnts where there is, in fact, a limited amount of ops ? Your 1000 SaaS web servers might be crawling with devs who release a new SW version every 2 weeks. Smashing! But meanwhile, in air traffic control, they take a slightly different attitude. And the CAD lads are only bothered about backups and speed, while the bankers obsess about security and compliance. The power station manager thinks your ansible-playbook is gorgeous, as long as it doesn't black-out Surrey.
Is the Devops crowd just a little bit parochial?
"Perhaps the fact that as evidenced by the comments above, no-one can agree of the best distro/desktop combination!
Choice is bad, and the best restaurants have only one dish on the menu, right?
The lack of Linux desktoppery might have more to do with 3 decades of business agreements which legally ensure that every PC comes with Windows fully integrated.
Note: Files is what happened when Nautilus was simplified to death. If you liked Nautilus then Caja (part of the MATE ecosystem) carries it on in spirit, look and feel.
And PCmanFM does the same to Caja as Caja does to Nautilus, in that regard. (On Mint 17 MATE, anyway). Faster and less buggy.
some 25 to 30 years ago, there was a belief that software production would change radically...
...This was O-O, or object oriented software. Software production would radically change, the experts predicted... Of course, software production didn’t change radically into the component utopia that the academics had envisaged...
I confess to leaving a C++ course in 1991 almost overcome with excitement about OO. At the time I was working for Texas Instruments, and OO seemed like an unbeilievably powerful way to solve engineering problems. Select a few objects, glue them together, et voila. An end to repetitive programming. An and to complexity. Write and exchange objects. Share and enjoy.
High level languages embraced OO. Even assembled ones like Perl and VB. And whatever the current flavour-of-the-month language is, it is almost certainly OO.
But orgasmic object sharing never materialized. Instead, standard "object libraries" became part of the language. Instead of being a super-duper, custom built, poloymorphous, multi inherited, operator-overloaded panacea that we would exchange and embellish and re-use, OO turned into a boring old standard library. Basically, OO == stdio.h.
The OO model is still the best way to handle complexity as an application grows. Only the code re-use remains elusive.
OK now I must return to that programme, think I'll re-use that class from 2 years ago. No. it wold be quicker to write a new object. After all, I am better at the language now, and conditions have changed, and the hardware is 10 times faster now, so that optimized cache is no longer needed, and, and...
Don't you just hate those posts where commentards bore you with obscure computers they once used. Well stop reading. I won't have a bad word said against Apollo. Ah yes, and the sublime Domain/OS. If the Ubuntu/Gnome crowd want to see how a graphical shell is really done, go forth to Ebay, where you can buy a nifty DN3500 for only....
When Megacorps say "young", they mean "cheap". Cheap is what they want, not yoof. They love cheap. Shareholders love cheap. Cheap boosts short term profits by reducing the wage bill, by far the biggest expense any megacorp faces. If a 64 Python dev would work for the same wages as a 24 year old, the older chap would get the job every time. More euphamisms:
"recent graduate" -> cheap
"free of family commitments who can work long hours" - no, just cheap
"digital native" -> cheap.
On the subject of "digital native", any grad born after '66 has spent their whole career in the Internet age, but lacks a certain skill, ie the ability to work for a very small wage indeed.
Phrase/sentence howler - come on Ed.
"You might have heard the words "combination" or "permutation" used in conversation..."
Permutaions and combinations are not news to Reg readers. This isn't the Grauniad.
"...mathematics has a convenient formula for the calculations shown above and you can search the internet for it... "
Or just remember it from school. Not a bad article, despite my sniping. Just told to the wrong people.
"My personal experiences with the NHS have been uniformally excellent and the staff friendly, helpful and competent "
I've had good NHS experiences, medium ones, and awful NHS experiences. That's the trouble. You never know what you are going to get. Here is a very trivial example, three recent blood tests:
1. Nurse took a sample of blood so skilfully I felt no discomfort. Had I been asleep when she stuck the needle in, I probably wouldn't have woken up. She was also friendly and efficiant. Great.
2. Same surgery, different nurse. Talked non-stop about her holidays while wobbling the needle painfully in my arm. Afterwards I almost fainted, which might be unrelated.
3. Same surgery, third nurse. Friendly and efficient. Almost as good as (1). I noticed she ommited to wipe the injection area with alcohol beforehand, presumably slightly increasing my chances of an infection, but I didn't say anything.
Taking blood samples is trivial, but the same inconsistency happens in the most serious treatments. I could relate depressing stories of crappy "treatment" received by seriously ill relatives, but won't. Some will argue that poor NHS experiences are caused by lack of funding but I think that lack of responsibility and accountability plays a big part.
Put bluntly, the NHS, as a huge publicly funded body, lacks motivation to keep you alive, to treat you with compassion or to minimize your discomfort. Human nature dictates it. A private health company, on the other hand, is highly motivated to achieve all these things. But then, private health companies are also motivated by profit, which can lead to a whole different set of problems, equally as bad as the above.
Okay sorry about the lecture, I'll stop there.
For the same reason that cartoons have only 3 fingers and a thumb, many roadsigns are not accurate representations, nor should they be. They are designed for quick comprehension and no more. If Matt Parker can design a pentagonal ball which is also clearer and quicker to recognose than the current model, I'll sign his petition.
These articles remind me of Lester Haines (RIP), and his stout work on Logowatch over the years.
On Uber - "The norms of modern online journalism require that at this point we embed a few tweets from the unwashed masses* decrying Uber's descent into branding anarchy, as if anyone really gives a tinker's what people are gobbing off about in 140 characters or less."
TomTom - "A free whalesong CD (including the hit track The Ross Sea Minke posse versus the Japanese whaleburger crew) to sharp-eyed reader Mat Butterworth."
More on Google site:theregister.co.uk haines
Never got ET. Perhaps at 15 I was a bit too old.
Never got Bladerunner either, for which I apologise and will keep rewatcing.
Loved The Thing (1982) on TV but couldn't watch it, or other gore-fests, in the cinema.
Tron perhaps "didn't impact pop culture", but it did help to send regiments of us down the computer track.
"Just try watching the sh!te on the other channels, peppered by adverts, and you'll soon turn back to the Beeb."
If only that were still true, DailyLlama. Unfortunately, all BBC programmes are seperated buy long avertising cycles, on both TV and radio. On radio, news programmes are also routinely interrupted, sometimes every 8 ot 10 minutes, for a short advertising slot. The ads themselves are usually for future BBC programs, or just promoting the BBC itsellf. Just adverts for themselves, no more.
It is quite tragic for the Beeb. They have killed their own biggest advantage over commercial rivals, and shown how little they think of viewers and listeners by targeting them with anoying advertorial that isn't even needed for commercial survival.
And now here is the soft music, and that honeyed voice intones, for the 11th time, about that forthcoming Radio 4 programme that you have no interest in...
Broadly agree. Many "Devops" teams lack the "ops" experience to justify the name, and are sometimes just a group of well meaning developers and power users who have been given the root password. Cloud gives them the power to orchestrate, and they pump out instances blithely unaware of sysem basics, with predictable results. It isn't their fault though.
...this isn't meant to imply that Claburn secretly agrees with Delmore, but to point out the general situation: Many people must now have, or quickly obtain, the "correct" views, or risk losing their jobs and livelihood.
This affects people across the media, in many large companies and public organisations.
Common sense indicates that many of these people will secretly disagree, but not dare to speak out..
Thomas Claburn dismisses Damore's entire article without a pause:
"Among other ill-supported claims, he insisted there's no pay gap."
In fact the scientific claims Delmore made have since received some vindication. However, I would not advise any ambitious journalist to dwell on that, or to be seen to agree with Delmore in any way, because, as the author knows:
"Damore's tract got him fired shortly after it became public."
In your devops team, I am sure there are qualified software engineeers. But how many team members have years of experience as real, full time systems administrators ?
Right. There aren't as many sysadmins in the world as their are devs. Devops teams tend to be lopsided. A better decription would be devdevdevdevdevops. So you end up with a polished and elegant Attlasian infrastructure, but everyone thinks that "Dirty Cow" is some James Herriot thing. Get more oppy. Your infrstructure will than you.
I'm not sure what the solution is. Giving me a rate rise would be a good start.
Entropy is not the same as "uncontrolled changes". Entropy is also the build up of natural changes over time, eg. as files naturally grow and change, software ages, passwords change, and so on.
Eg. I need a new route adding to my critical server, which has 7 interfaces. Immutable infrastructure says I just roll out a new identical server but with the added route. However, that approach makes the large assumption no entropy has occurred which could impact the change. It also requires an interruption of service while a switchover is made to the new system. It also requires careful management of potential issues, eg. identical IP addresses, changing MAC addresses, changing system UUIDs, and much other stuff. In other words, it also requires a great deal more time, people and expense than the single command which could be used to add a route in the conventional way.
The moment a system is booted, it starts to change. Immutable?
I love Ansible. But its main use is in commissioning new systems, and comissioning new systems was never really the problem. We already had many ways to do it: cloning, golden images and so on.
Ansible gives the impression that you can translate your infrastructure to a code base, and that tickles developers' fancies. But maintainance is the hard bit, as it always was. It isn't appropriate to release an ansible playbook all over your live, mission-critical server. The consequeces of even a small bug are just too great. Even if Ansible was used to build the system in the first place, the server has since been subject to 12 months of entropy, and is now a stranger to the parent Ansible code.
Roll out is comparitavely simple, and always was. What little complexity it contains is easily managed. Maintenance is more tricky.
"If you are not opposed to this domain being hosted, you are a Nazi sympathiser, regardless of..." - careful @Kaltern. Becoming what one despises, and all that.
I agree that cencership is a necessary evil. But this is more about personal ethics than state censorship. I am strongly for free speech, but would not provide my contracting services to an organization like Stormer. Would you? Of course not. These companies feel the same way, and have done the right thing in my view.
Not to mention the absurd contrast theft which plagues "modern" websites. The Register is in the minority with its crisp black-and-white text. Many sites are now only readable with constant eye strain. Or they were until a few months ago. Those who brought us semi-visible text are now in full reverse-ferret, but my accountants still server up limp whiteish on whiter text, and Google search is still pretty gutless.
It seems reasonable to treat online abuse like abuse in the street (as if you were shouting in somebody's face). In fact, I thought it was already treated like that.
The problem with a specific "hate speech" law is that it could be used as a means to silence criticism or dissent, leading to the "safe space" rubbish we see on some university campuses, bottling up extremism, and eventually promoting hate rather than reducing it.
"online" isn't the problem. "anonymity" is the problem. If Twitter could verify users' real names and addresses before letting them post, everyone would play (reaosonably) nice. I don't know technically how that could be done, but if you can figure it out you will be a rich man.
"At £750 an hour the price per day would be several times £1500."
It would indeed. Itemised, this was the barristers bill for just a couple of hours iirc.
I look forward to professional engineers like myself obtaining a similar closed shop arrangement, so that only people with a BEng are allowed to touch or operate computers, and we can charge similar amounts.
The Supreme Court is part of the same legal profession that will, once you have filed your complaint and taken your employer to a tribunal, charge you £750 an hour or more for barrister representation.
In 2006 I took an employer to tribunal over unfair dismissal. It was all going well until it got to the part where hiring a barister was required (there is no choice; it is a requirement). Even for 1 day, the price was over £1500. Fortunately for me, the employer settled on terms before it came to court.
(Tip: tick that "family legal cover" box on your house insurance.)