I'd like to see epub2 on there as well.
Posts by James 51
3426 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jun 2009
Page:
UK citizens to Microsoft: Oi. We WANT ODF as our doc standard
Yes! New company smartphones! ... But I don't WANT one
Amazon fuses LoveFilm, subs service, calls it Prime Instant Video
Toshiba Encore: The Windows 8.1 tablet that might catch on
Boffins: You'll see, TWITTERNET! We'll get the TRUTH out of you...
Snowden journo boyf grill under anti-terror law was legal, says UK court
I am not harking back to what was and what might have been now if only. I was refering directly to us replacing trident on our own now. The UK cannot on its own today develop a creditable submarine based continuous at sea nuclear deterrent. It would take more time and more money than any UK government would be will to invest to redevelop the technology we would need to insource. We could argue back and forth about this but we are straying somewhat from the topic at hand.
Re: Not quite the same
There's a certain stigma to be being held under anti-terrorism legislation. Your name could appear on a number of certain registers and lists and without having a conviction you can find it difficult to do things like fly to the US, get certain jobs etc etc. I am not saying he should not have been detained, I am saying they should have used a more appropriate law under which to detain him.
As for the info being of use to terrorists, juding by what has been on the news it would be of indirect use e.g. look how bad our enemies are, come fight with us but not in directly planning attacks.
Given that withouth the USA we'd have no deterrent I am not sure that they have that much to fear from us (watching the UK build the replacement for Trident alone would be funny (from a safe distance)). With them, it's more of an 'I'm a big boy too' kind of thing. Could easily subsitute that entry for France.
Councils have been using anti-terrorism laws to investigate people sending their schools outside of the catchment area they live in and for fly tipping too. He was detained under the wrong law (not sure which one they should have used) but this kind of abuse of the law and due process is hardily unique.
The UNTOLD SUCCESS of Microsoft: Yes, it's Windows 7
Yeah, but the surface pro 2 is over £700. That's straying into ultrabook territory. That's at least £200 more than the 15 inch iCore 5 touch screen laptop with a lot of ram and a big hdd and a decent gpu that my wife bought a few months ago. £350 is the most I'd pay for convience of being able to carry my tablet in my bag and be able to use it to do some light work on as well.
I have used 8.1 on a laptop with a touch screen and a desktop without a touch screen. It's just about bareable on the laptop but on the desktop, frustration kept smacking me up the side of the head as even simple tasks were needlessly complex. For anyone using a PC for work, I'd avoid like the plague, particularly if you don't have a touchscreen.
Windows 8 natural home might be those 8" tablets that are coming out now. The messed up interface might work on a small touch screen. Put in a 64-bit copy with 4GB of RAM and a 2.5" SSD with at least one USB 3 port and they could be on to something.
Who OWNS data generated by 'connected cars' sensor slurpers?
"insurance companies (who protect us right?)"
No. An insurance company's job is to get as much cash out of you as they can and pass that on to their shareholders. Giving you back money is something they'd rather avoid and will go to some lengths including not paying out when legally required in the hope people will give up and leave them alone.
Re: Insurance nightmare / holy-grail (depending on your point of view)
If you dont' share the data you won't get insurance. It will be as simple as that.
Who are these companies customers though? The poeple who buy the cars or the people who buy the data about the people who buy their cars? There's a huge potential for conflict of interest.
HP wants HUNDREDS of hapless staffers OUT by April - trade union
Friends don't do tech support for friends running Windows XP
France demands that Google post badge of shame on its pages
Jolla entices hardware hackers with free device development kit
Apple cash stash dash results in Icahn v CalPERS bitchfight
Apple RESURRECTS the iPhone 4: report
Tell us we're all doomed, MPs beg climate scientists
ISS astronauts to grow tomatoes and rice …. IN SPAAAAACE
Want a touch-friendly solar-powered laptop? Apple just patented it
Re: At last!
Prior art invalidates a patient. With the exception of opaque or transparent glass on command, I have seen every feature outlined in this patient in other products. I do wonder why you'd want to effectively turn your solar panel off but that's another question.
BTW, my response was in part to the tag line of the article which implies that Apple have patiented attaching solar panels to laptops. If they try to enforce this, a lot of companies are going to face never ending lawsuits:
http://inhabitat.com/samsungs-solar-powered-laptop-to-go-on-sale-in-us-in-july/
http://solaptop.com/en/
http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/04/first-solar-powered-laptop/
And then I got bored of trying to remember all the places I've seen this done before.
Facebook app now reads your smartphone's text messages? THE TRUTH
BlackBerry makes its devilish Android trickery official in OS update
What can Microsoft learn from 'discontinued operations' at Nokia?
It's difficult to see what Microsoft can do with the Nokia brand. They have a glacial rate of progress with the OS, to the point where the recent Black update implemented features Nokia have been complaining were lacking. They don’t have the R&D team coming up with stuff like pureview and as Elop in his eternal wisdom dismissed the R&D teams at Nokia, they’ll have a hard time bringing together the kind of talent they are going to need. Microsoft are trying to do everything but I can’t help but feel their internal politics could see this wither on the vine.
The one hope might be that Microsoft can keep development going and put out handsets with thin margins to claw back some market space and mind share. But they desperately need to kick things into at least first gear.
Vice squad cuffs vice chairman of Bitcoin Foundation in $1m money-laundering probe
Re: Criminal intent
No, but the bank is not responsible if you withdraw 5k and use it in a transaction involving something illegal or perform the transfer on line. If they suspect something dodgy is going on they have to report it but if they don't know who you are, don't know who the recipient is or what transfer of good/services are involved, it’s going to rely on wiretap evidence to prove the ‘bank’ knew the transaction involved something dodgy and they choose not to report it.
Re: Criminal intent
"United States coins or currency (or other monetary instruments the Secretary of the Treasury prescribes),"
Does bitcoin fit this description? If it does, does that mean that they can only charge him if one of the parties (okay and/or the servers hosting the transaction) was in the USA at the time?
If he was money laundering, by all means throw the book at him but it's a short step from not liking bad people to people we don't like being bad. If officals bend the law to achieve their ends, then merely being law abiding isn't enough to protect you anymore.
You're assuming that they have that, though with the NSA who can say what they have. Just reminds me a lot of the exective of a gambling company that was based in the UK, it's servers were in the UK and everything it was doing was legal in the UK but because a handful of people from Texas were able to use the site that executive was arrested when the plane he was on landed in the US.