Aaaah
If it was Operation Vacu-Suck then the key to the safe would be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 - so they'd not need the drill/hoover combo ;)
925 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jun 2009
----
The implication is that MySQL is being downloaded by developers or for evaluation and that it goes no further.
----
Or alternatively - devs download it on Windows boxes AND use it on live web servers. Those development environments may also be running different versions of MySQL - to check application compatibility with the newer MySQL versions before live deployment... they may also have legacy versions, incremental point increases not rolled out to live servers or beta versions.
Of course the live server may only be running a single MySQL instance for multiple websites over different Virtual Hosts - as is quite common with cheaper LAMP hosting.
I'd say, at a guess, for every live web server running MySQL there are at least 2 development versions installed and since the W|LAMP stack is pretty portable it's quite feasible to use Windows boxes for development purposes and deploy live to Unix-a-like systems.
Saw it - clicked the "See threat details button" - thought, "that was a bad idea - clicking a random button on a popup..." ... anyway.
Read the blurb which was basically saying upgrade to ZoneAlarm Pro to be protected from this $new_scary_thing - none of these other free offerings protect you from $new_scary_thing! What if there are @scary_things?!?
So, compare PAID_FOR ZoneAlarm Pro with AntiVirus to oooh FREE Avast? And in this one, single test case, paid for ZAPro was better... yeah, I'm convinced by that argument. *close*
That WAS MSs box model...
Take a DIV of width 100px - give it padding 10px and under the standard model the DIV is now 120px wide; under the MS model, the DIV is still 100px wide but the usable area of that DIV is only 80px - MS padded in, the standard pads out.
The reason is obvious when you give your 100px DIV a padding of 50px.
I seem to remember margins worked the same in IE's model and the standard.
We're talking web servers here Windows/ISS is NOT the dominant environment for web servers. The regular claims that everyone targets Windows because it has the majority install base does not apply when talking about the web. It even says in the article that it's a software setup used on 25% of web servers... though I suspect it's very slightly less than that.
If the ubiquity argument was to hold water we'd hear endless reports of serious, exploitable vulnerabilities in Unix-a-like systems running Apache - the LAMP stack in particular. They're not unheard of, true, especially when you factor in dependant libraries (like OpenSSL) or application vulnerabilities as well... but they're generally either less severe or very difficult to exploit.
> Apache 2.0 has 29 open vulnerbilities, IIS 7 only has 3, what does this mean?
It means you're good at pulling meaningless numbers out of thin air? Severity and ease of exploit on those vulns please.
"A car has 29 vulnerabilities, all of them involve breaking into it using a large sledgehammer - while another car has only 3 vulnerabilities, one of which is that there's a 50% chance of the engine exploding in a massive fireball when the ignition is started" - which car would you rather have?
I'm not saying that IS the case with Apache vs IIS - just that giving a count of vulnerabilities is meaningless sensationalism.
I assume you're American?
And weirdly - I kind of agree with you here. There's no reason why people in any other country in the world can't set up services - like Facebook - based on their own local jurisdiction and allow things like online betting, norks and swearing ... and to some extent they do (I'm thinking of a couple of UK tabloids here).
However, they may have to ban Americans, particularly from gambling sites, so as not to get arrested should they ever enter the US (Peter Dicks). So, US law/opinion seems to apply on the www irrespective as to whether the site is based in the US or not.
It doesn't work the other way around of course - Chinese law doesn't apply to Google and there are probably innumerable US (film/porn) sites that would be illegal under the UKs repressive "Extreme Porn Law" - to be honest you're probably pushing it with the "donkey scene" at the end of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.
Until such time as any of them start processing transactions... oh, hang on - Google Checkout perhaps? Facebook adverts maybe.
Even a discussion forum about dancing monkeys would be helped by a relational model - it makes (safely) deleting threads that much easier. How many forums (fora?) have you known "fall over" and loose big chunks of data because they're just sat on top of something like MyISAM - I can think of at least three that I use in recent years.
Nowadays, if you're using MySQL, there's not _much_ of a performance hit to using the InnoDB engine which allows for relationships. However - as with most things in life - there's the "horses for courses" proviso.
If you're using your database basically as unstructured document storage, there's no great advantage to InnoDB BUT there is an advantage to using MyISAM - FullText searches. Of course, you could hold an indexing system in InnoDB whilst keeping the documents in MyISAM tables inside MySQL. - then the only trick is keeping them in synch.
As is stands currently - not only do you have to go through quite a lot of effort to enable it (presumably because it's in "beta" heh) but once you do there's a little dropdown link next to the search bar that says "instant search on" - just click it to get the dropdown to toggle it to "off" ... of course, they may have some IP -> Location mapping that changes how it works depending on where you are.
----
I understand that under specific circumstances IP addresses are not personal-related but in general we would say as data protection authorities IP addresses are personal data because they identify indirectly the user of computer systems connected to the internet.
----
Technically the IP address merely identifies the machine NOT the user - and in many cases (networks) all it identifies is the router not even an individual PC... and that's only once it's combined with the data from the ISP.
So yes - it's personal data but it's not sensitive personal data. There is a legal difference in the DPA (which, as they stated, doesn't apply to Switzerland).
---- quote AC ----
in my personal and biased view, an IP address should be considered private when the entity storing it have the ability to link it to a real person (ie. Google, especially if you have a gmail account).
----
True, but you can circumvent it, Garbage In, Garbage Out - Google only holds the data you give them, give them crap and that's all they've got. An IP Address isn't really any more private than your home address such as you could look up in the phone book... what we could really use is an Internet equivalent of ex-directory - technically virtually impossible but it would be nice.
I thought "inciting religious hatred" was a crime - don't know about in the USA though. Muslims consider the Koran itself to be sacred, the literal words of God - it must be handled reverently. Burning it like this is tantamount to wandering into your local church and taking a dump on the altar/pulpit/whatever during Sunday Mass.
Since I grew up in a country where the car-bombs were planted by "Christians" - death by bomb isn't something you generally worry about - it'll happen or it won't. What I object to is dickheads living in the Dark Ages - Christian or Muslim. Worse from any of the three Abrahamic religions as they all worship the same God - essentially they're fighting each other over semantics (Christian/Muslim or even inside Christianity itself with Catholic/Protestant).
feckin eejits
I had to enable it to find out what the fuss was about - funny how this has been reported as a "fancy HTML5-based BuckyBall animation" and yet utterly breaks when you disable JavaScript. Rather tends to imply that this IS JavaScript and NOT (purely) HTML 5 doesn't it?
That's what's pissing me off most about HTML 5 - all the w00t! Look at teh shinies in HTML 5 RAH RAH RAH... actually, I think you'll find it's (bits of) CSS 3, JavaScript and the HTML 5 DOM - all HTML 5 does at the moment is allows you to natively embed videos and improves the semantics of certain markup elements - <canvas> is just a wrapper for scripted graphics; not really any better than the deprecated/defunct <applet> tag IMO.
It's just a markup language for crying out loud!
... this is the real world, failing to protect your trademark can result in a loss of that trademark and then we could see a whole range of Jedi merchandise that has absolutely nothing to do with LucasArts whatsoever and is merely leeching of their brand.
Still, they may be easily startled but soon they'll be back - and in greater numbers.
Already had one of these flyers through the post from VM, comparing "average" speeds across several ISPs.
To be honest, I'm surprised my area isn't over-subscribed - I live in a flat, the local council (still) owns the building and the tenants hold leases to the flats. The council discourages satellite dishes so I'd guess there are a _lot_ of cable users - which means VM... and yet I still get average (or better) speeds on my 20meg line (normally 18+ Mb/s).
There are problems with VM of course - but the speed of the broadband has never been one of them for me.
I don't quite get the argument that "it's not fair to compare fibre-optic to copper" - from the point of view of the end-user (in a cable area), what difference does it make? Is VM consistently faster than its main competitors? Yes. End of story... for 99% of people who don't hit the throttling. Of course as more and more high-bandwidth applications gain in popularity (blinkbox for instance) that throttling limit may become more of an issue.
What has the ASA got to do with "government" exactly? Well, beyond the traditional sense of the word, as in to govern.
It's an industry body that works by policing the industry rather than having oversight imposed by central government ... for all true, blue-bloodied capitalists this is a good thing? no?
Is it me or are most of the States that are filing legal complaints in the deep South - the kind of places, so rumour has it, where sex with your sister/daughter/pet is "normal" ... apparently so long as they don't advertise these "services" to others via Craglist.
Dread to think what a Craglist for Norfolk (UK) would look like *shudders*
OK - anyone else I can insult while I'm at it ... :D
------
I have *two* websites that don't work in Opera (and both are because the web dev was too bloody lazy to include it in the list of identified browsers
------
Why the hell were the web monkeys using browser recognition (rather than "feature" recognition) anyway?
The point of Firefox is as a developer tool; it's standards compliant and has some of the best developer extensions available (Web Developer toolbar and ColorZilla, at least, are essential IMO). If you want a web browser for ooooh, I don't know, browsing the web perhaps - yes, you might be better off with Opera (mostly).
Opera is normally one of the first browsers to implement the latest standards as well - for instance, CSS3 border-radius moved to Candidate Recommendation at the end of last year so, in theory, border-radius: 12px; should work - but currently we have:
border-radius - the standard as used by Opera (and, I believe, the latest versions of Safari)
-moz-border-radius
-webkit-border-radius
... and surprise, surprise - there's NO implementation for current versions of Internet Explorer (it's implemented in version 9 apparently).
----
i need to install a mac's anti virus!
----
If you're a Mac user - you probably don't know how. Seemingly grammar is beyond your grasp so software installation must work by magic pixie power.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Now can we all please stop the silly "My OS is better than your OS" willy-waving please?
I wrote something similar to this for a CMS module. If you were adding a book to your store you could start typing the "contributor" name (might be the author or illustrator for instance) and it would pull up an auto-complete type suggestion box to the right of the text input box. So you type "Jon" and it pulls up all the "Jones" and "Jonathon" records and so on. Obviously this is of a much more limited scope with a much smaller data-set and even then I ran into some browser quirks and performance issues along the way (it works very well now thanks).
I'm sure Google's huge team of codemonkeys will be able to sort it - what I'm not convinced about is the NEED for it. I only really type searches into the Google page itself when I'm refining a search I've already instigated through the browser's in-built search bar - and if I'm refining a search its because I didn't narrowly enough define the parameters in the first place. That being the case, why would I want Google to expand the parameters of my search with irrelevancies whilst I'm attempting to refine the search?
I suppose, in a way though, if Google are storing everyone's search results this will add a lot of white noise to their lists... imagine searching on oooh, "Goldfinch" for instance.
...
Gold => all results relating to gold and "gold-diggers", gold teeth, golden showers(!) and so on.
...
Goldfi => Goldfinger, Goldfish, Goldfinch, plus "Goldfi" as company/personal names and web handles.
...
Goldfin => Goldfinger, Goldfinch and all the company/names and handles.
...
Goldfinch
So, on a search for an innocuous common garden bird, I'm apparently a golden toothed, money-grabbing perv who likes being pissed on by James Bond bad-guys? Actually ... ;)
The mere fact that you can still get T-Shirts with something that looks remarkably like that "Intel Inside" logo but say, oh such witty things as "Satan Inside", is testament to the success of the campaign I'd have thought.
Besides - I tend to buy chips on performance (judged by published benchmark results before purchase) - and I'm now on my first Intel processor for a long time (previous 2 home PCs were AMD), Intel have taken the lead at the moment.
Must admit though - my current i7 overclocks beautifully.
You were doing so well until that "using more than their fair share bit" ... had you said "more than they'd be prepared to pay for" I'd have been with you.
Unfortunately as some chap above me said - there's a lot more going on over your line than you have control over - you'd end up paying for all the spam emails you receive as well.
You've sort of got a small advantage in a "semi-rural" setting - you might not have to dig up huge sections of road causing weeks of disruption in busy urban areas.
The problem with upgrading the lines in the UK is, in part, down to the amount of investment required once you factor in the complexity of doing so in a heavily urbanised environment... however it's only in these environments that there is likely to be long term profit.
Thankfully I'm on cable and normally get around 17-18Mbs on my 20Mbs subscription - so that's not bad.
Mind - I DO like the idea of advertising (or being forced to advertise as) *nothing less than* XMbs :D
So what you do is create a quasi-unique machine identifier based on the IP address and some arbitrary data gleaned from the browser (such as the UserAgent or HTTP data) - mush that into a salted hash and you will, in most instances, be able to tell one machine from another even if they're on the same network.
This fails only when you're dealing with particularly diligent SysAdmins who have identical images across every machine in their network and keep them all patched up with a group policy - something I've never encountered personally.
If a 10 minute delay, once or twice a week, constitutes the "most delayed line in the country" - that IS perfection - or at least so damned close to it to make little difference.
Try catching the train in Blighty - "We're sorry, it's the wrong kind of rain - but it's OK, we've laid on a replacement bus service for you". Hell, we were eligible for compensation in the West Midlands a few years ago because they buggered up the train service so badly, for MONTHS, that you'd be lucky to get a train that was ONLY ten minutes late... it's not quite that bad now but still.
funny how many upvotes you've got for saying this "this will probably be very unpopular" - mind I agree with you. If they're using average speed cams in urban areas instead of those bloody speed bumps then I'm all for it.
If they WERE to reduce the amount on dual-carriageways and motorways as well that would be a definite plus in my book. So have another upvote on me ;)
Not using HTML5 because it's not ready - what a novel idea.
HTML5 is a PR stunt, it's more marketing than IT - here's a hint, it's a flipping markup language, it's not anything special. Worse yet, even when it's complete it'll be a non-standard standard as you'll be able to hack about with it XML well-formed or not. The point of a standard is, surely, that there is one standard way of doing things.
The only real improvements I see with HTML5 are semantics like using video to denote that something is a video, or nav to denote a navigation list. Other than that, it's just another markup language - and one that's worse specced than XHTML 2 was.
I'm glad the Beeb, at least, haven't bought into the whalesong (in this instance anyway).
You appear to be under the misapprehension that web developers are paid a lot - in the IT development heap, web developers are normally considered one, maybe two rungs above pond-slime. Unfortunately, in many cases, this seems justifiable.
Anyway - back on track - from my experience, Internet Explorer only loads the UI quicker; opening web pages or new tabs actually takes considerably longer than in Firefox. It's a smoke and mirrors exercise.
On my work desktop (WinXP) Firefox is one of the faster browsers to load up to useful state - quicker than IE, Opera and Safari (even with plug-ins) in fact it's only beaten by Chrome and Lynx (hardly surprising on that one). On my main home PC (Win7) it's hardly worth worrying about since none of the web browsers take much longer than 1s to load ("from cold").
Having said that though, FF on my partner's WinXP laptop is appallingly slow to load up - in fact, I've only ever encountered issues with Firefox on laptops and Macs weirdly enough.