I wonder how much common code
It shares with its brethren on other platforms.
3879 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jun 2009
Most of us know what good looks like, just that most of us lack the clout and the opportunity to stop a project going off the rails, so spend the majority of our time doing damage control or just saying 'on your head be it'
Fact is once the amount of meetings, power points, consultants, project managers and ba's reach a certain critical mass - nothing can save a failed project.
Delivery methodology whilst it can be helpful is just one of a multitude of factors.
Why does it need to keep within spitting distance of an apple chip? Comparing a chip designed to run completely different OSes is pretty pointless. The A9 will never run Android or Linux and the 820 will never run iOS.
Apple will always have a better opportunity to more tightly couple their software and hardware than Qualcomm will.
Comparing their performance is a dubious thing to do - there are too many variables involved.
Better to compare with Samsungs high end Arm processors.
Show me any company the size of IBM that's not a lumbering dinosaur. Google and Facebook included.
Why anyone conflates a development methodology with how a company generates revenue is beyond me.
Show me an "agile astute development" that makes billions per quarter. Most of the dinosaurs will still be around when the shore ditch wannabe's have failed fast and finally fucked off, and those dinosaurs are picking over their remains.
IBMs blues are purely down to Romety being unable to deliver any other strategy than "fire & spin off" whilst using the profits to support share buy backs and the market has seen through her.
Galloway seems not to be a saint if you do some research. The jury's out on the green lady.
Now if it was David Davis complaining he might have had a piont but I suspect he's far too aware of the galloping hypocrisy of doing so whilst still remaining a pro-privacy campaigner.
if this comes to pass it will be time to layer up the protections.
Like dna analysis can be foiled using detrius from the back of a bus, what we need is for all the browsers to support a "fluff" plugin that seeds your actual surfing habits with lots of random, but not too dodgy stuff.
I foresee the Tor Browser bundle getting a bigger lease on life too.
US:Elon Musk we'll be on Mars.
UK:We might have an engine thats only taken 20 years to develop.
There's times when I am ashamed on how small our reach is. Remember when we just did things. For all their faults (and there are hideously many) thats one thing our American cousins dont lack.
Really? - care to explain what great insight you have into DB that lead you to that conclusion? The only way DB wont be here in 2 years is if the entire financial system implodes and if that happens we'll all have more important things to think about.
Its underlying business is generally profitable - revenues are around 30-40Bn pa - the vast bulk of its losses have come from Regulatory fines and Accounting write downs.
If DB stopped trading tomorrow the inertia of that 30-40Bn of revenue flow would keep segments of it trading for years to come.
Or is the European Parliament the most sane democracy on the planet? OK they are fairly toothless in the face of the both European Commission and the Council of Ministers, but it strikes me as being far more representative of the ordinary people of europe than anything else. When they plug away at an issue they seem to get some traction.
I can't help but think that a EP + European Courts of Justice represent all that is good about this grand European experiment. Daily Fail hysteria about the ECHR not withstanding.
Not really most of this bill is about voluntary compliance. It's fairly toothless, you just make damn sure there is a clause in your contract with a us company that you would regard any sharing under this act as a breach of contract, and make sure your contract is with a non USIan part of the company.
In practice apart from a few companies being dicks I don't expect this to make a big difference compared to the current slurpage plus the failure of safe harbour.
This is really just about the junior law enforcement arms not having to ask the NSA for sloppy seconds.
Havent read the paywalled article but its entirely possible that Sequential refers to a pair of attacks a DDOS + SQL Injection attack at different points possibly even different attackers. But there's so much FUD being spouted by Talk Talk that its impossible to say either both at this point.
Whats clear is every statement that they make at a technical level is utterly suspect due to their complete inability to communicate at a level a GCSE Computing student could manage.
If anyone knows a Detica guy - I'd book a few pints with them in 2 weeks time and on the 5th pint say "Hypothetically speaking,........."
PCI-DSS only covers credit cards so Talk Talk are technically correct about not having to encrypt Bank Account details. I suspect however they are going to be part of the case law that leads to Bank account details being encrypted as "reasonable" under the data protection act.
That's way too harsh. Her turn in GOT is one of the better ones and considering she's 18 and has been doing it for the last 6 years she's obviously a talent to watch - way ahead of day the Harry Potter actors at the same age.
Bear in mind that in GOT she's acting with virtually every UK character actor of a certain age plus a selection of handpicked international actors.
If she makes the right career choices she's a star in the making.
And if you haven't watched GOT - your loss.
But filled with some terribly hamfisted "comedy" only after did I realise it was Rufus Hound - current the leading BBC contender for worlds unfunniest man. Note to the writer of this weeks Ep - you can't write comedy - please don't attempt it again.
If they had not taken the mistep of trying to balance the darkness of Ashildr with the comedy it could have been a truly classic episode.
It was frankly insulting to both Peter Capaldi and Maisey Williams that they couldn't let the episode stand on their 2 shoulders. They were electric together with nary a romantic notion in sight. In Ashildr they have possibly filled a role that has been empty since we last saw the Rani. More Maisey please it's nice to see her stretch her talents.
And why didn't he vet the press release?
Even if the he's a PHB I would have expected clearer language than this. It's blatantly obvious that whoever wrote that release doesn't know a website from a webserver.
Hmm - looks like they may have a "CTO" and that they are CIO-less at the moment. (Ad heavy links)
http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/CIO-Interview-Gary-Steen-CTO-TalkTalk
http://www.computerweekly.com/news/4500248681/Former-TalkTalk-CIO-to-lead-Police-ICT-Company
Can't say I've seen that - only Ebay under cuts Amazon in general for the stuff I buy., and that's only in the Widgety tat from China department,
Quite often I choose Amazon coz they can get it to me faster than everyone else, that's worth 50p more.
Like them or hate them their Logistics model is batshit insanely good although I guess it has to be to correct for Yodels ability to fuck up.
Last week I had bought a CO alarm, returned it as faulty and got a new one over Thurs to Tue all from the comfort of my keyboard,
@AC first post
In fairness to the guy it seems that he had very little - if any - secretive business in his email, apart from that application form, so whilst I agree with you in principle - and he should be given a rocket - it seems very little has been wrongly mailed home when say compared to Clinton who operated a whole goram server.
1 AOL account <> An entire email domain. Not saying its right - just saying its small potatoes.
@Alan. Your precise point being? Just because the bar to access it is low - doesn't mean we/MS shouldn't resist attempts to lower it further. Just because the NSA has it doesn't mean they are sharing with anyone but someone who can offer a bit of quid pro quo. Plus even the Patriot act requires some terrorism fig leaf.
With BB10 and its predecessors they had control of the whole OS. With the best will in the world no one outside of Google can be truly said to understand android. Given that BB are on really dodgy ground claiming it to be as secure* as their previous devices.
* For given values of secure. ie completely penetrated if the authorities mandate their own boxen being plugged into the infrastructure someplace, but probably still more secure than vanilla Android/iOS.