* Posts by I ain't Spartacus

10172 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Jun 2009

Sysadmin’s worst client was … his mother! Until his sister called for help

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

That's why even 2 or 3 year old children can just grab a tablet and start using it. Pretty soon they can find the icons of the games they like and use the thing with minimal supervision. Whereas with a PC they've got to get the hang of keyboard/mouse input doing stuff on the screen that's over there.

With tablet it's see shiny thing, point at shiny thing, shiny thing does something.

Adults have the intelligence and experience to think this out of course. But that doesn't come automatically, so they have to stop and think a lot. And also, when being shown something on the computer they switch off brain and just half listen and robotically do as they're told. Plus the odd random mouse click, to screw things up.

Which is why I now do explaining in a two step process. Step one with me sat at PC. Slowly showing them how to do stuff, and telling them to take notes for stuff they won't remember. Step two is making them sit at PC, and not telling them how do do things, only what to do. If they can't remember, ro didn't write it down, then I explain, get them to do it, and then suggest they add it to their notes this time, as they clearly didn't remember it last time.

This mostly works. As most times they don't take a note of anything when I show them - but realise that they'd forgotten it just 30 seconds later, and so do the second time. Which then also means they've got notes in a language we've agreed between us. Also many (if not most) people remember something for longer just by the act of writing it down.

Boeing CEO takes aim at Musk’s Starman-in-a-Tesla stunt

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Not a zero sum game...

AdamT,

Sure, SpaceX will almost certainly bring new customers into the market by lowering prices. If there's something to do via satellite that's only marginally profitable now, then it could become so with $20m lower launch costs. But it will take big price drops for that to matter much, given that even a £100m launch cost is less than the $400m satellite. Figures picked out of thin air, for illustrative purposes only...

But that doesn't help Boeing if they are still charging around $100-$200m per launch - when SpaceX are currently around $60m + some discount if you take a second-hand rocket. They said in a press conference a while ago that this would be no more than 30% off. Because if SpaceX can ramp up capacity, and stay reliable, they can steal all of Boeing/ULA's customers. As well as hoovering up the shiny new ones.

I don't know how many parts any of these rockets share, but I don't think it's any at all. So I doubt that an increase in volume of SpaceX production helps anybody else. Obviously if everyone sells more, then everyone gets economies of scale. Worst-case though is SpaceX alone get the increase, they get the economies of scale, become cheaper and it becomes a virtuous circle. Plus extra death-spiral for everyone else.

Especially if the BFR turns out to be all it's cracked up to be.

Boeing would be better served by talking a lot less shit, and getting more shit done.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

And if, while watching the twin rockets landing on pillars of fire, you didn't have the Thunderbirds music ringing in your head - then you've no soul. Or are too young/old to have watched Super-Marionnation, or can't remember music.

Now where's my nuclear powered airliner!

Best thing about a smart toilet? You can take your mobile in without polluting it

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: While on the theme of lower abdominal functions

Magnetic pants? What about people with prince alberts? They'll never get free!

El Reg needs you – to help build an automated beer-transporting robot

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Happy

Re: Buzzwords

Meet: Blockchain Agile Robotic Mobile Artificially Intelligent Delivery System. Or BARMAIDS for short.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Ok so high level thinking is needed to start us off

Will the beer transportation platform not also require armaments? In order to repel thirsty denizens of said shared space, employed by other companies?

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Acronym needed

OK. Challenge accepted! A barcronym for LESTER

Life Enhancing Sustenance Transportation Embracing Robotics

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Devil

Why build a robot?

I myself am already a fully-autonomous, self-contained, intelligent* beer-transportation system. Simply feed real ale into my oral input receptacle, and within just a few hours I can output lager wherever it is required. Warmed and under slight pressure. Although I strenuously deny any rumours that I've been working for Fosters for years...

*I'd pass a Turing test - if required to sober-up. Probably...

My PC makes ‘negative energy waves’, said user, then demanded fix

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: A solution

Anything that takes the piss out of these people that need their mental faculties re-aligning with a croquet mallet is welcome in my book...

Sorry, your post required a minor edit.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Reverse the polarity!

I'm planning to go on the comedy circuit.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: A solution

Chainmail is rather expensive. Tinfoil will do nicely.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Unhappy

Re: Switch to...

I've got a user who's "electronically sensitive". She can't hold a phone to her ear without it giving her headaches. This includes mobile phones, DECT ones and now also corded old-style phones apparently.

turns out this can be "fixed" by her wearing a bluetooth headset. I'm saying nothing - lest she insist on a pair of baked bean tins connected by string next.

Bluetooth is powered by ancient Viking bloodlust right? Wait til she finds out the side-effects of this, are an uncontrollable desire to loot monateries.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Happy

Re: Reverse the polarity!

Ohm my God, that's a poor pun...

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Mousing left-handed is surprisingly easy. Compared with trying to write with the wrong hand. Or taking a left-handed shot in pool.

It's not quite as comfortable as doing it right-handed, but the few times I've had to do it for a few minutes have been fine. I hate laptop track pads with either hand, far more than mousing with the wrong one.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: "And bluetooth with Win10 is an iffy affair"

Surely you mean "And bluetooth with Win<x> is an iffy affair"?

No, I think what you both mean is: "And bluetooth is an iffy affair."

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: A solution

Erm, what if my chakra is already so polished that my chi keeps sliding off it?

Other than that, your service sounds excellent!

My Tibetan digital detox lasted one morning, how about yours?

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Fifty shades of tea

Tea should be made in a teapot. With loose leaves. Then strained - unless you've got one of those lift-out baskety things. And you need a tea cosy, because the second cup from the pot is usually the nicest.

Earl Grey is nice for a change. But it does get a bit soapy if you over-brew it. I think it wants no more than a minute or two to brew.

Don't want to alarm you, but defence bods think North Korea could nuke UK 'within a few years'

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: The BBC were saying a missile could hit us 'in a few months'.

Nukes in shipping containers I can believe. North Korea have got the tech for that. Though as they're not plugged into global shipping routes, and there are radiation detectors at some major container ports, it's not quite as easy as all that. But I'm sure it could be done.

The last missile they tested could supposedly reach Alaska and Hawaii. I don't believe they've got one that can reach here yet.

Then there's the warhead size issue. It's one thing making a warhead that goes bang. It's more work to get that down to a useable size. Then they've got to do the heat shielding.

Seems like quite a lot of work to get done in 2 years.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

We were told Saddam could get to us within 45 minutes, and that turned out to be total horseshit.
.

No we weren't. The dossier said that Saddam could reach Cyprus, there was even a map with range circles drawn on it. Which was well within range of the SCUDs that he still had (in breach of UN resolutions and the 1991 ceasefire). And we know he had those, Iraq fired some of them in 2003.

The intelligence that was wrong, was that he had remaining useable chemical weapons stocks and the warheads to use SCUDs to launch them. The document said that we had intel suggesting this, which according to a documentary I saw on the BBC actually came from German intelligence. The original MI6 submission to the JIC (Joint Intelligence Committee) stated that there was uncorroborated evidence to sugges this, or some other such wording with caveats. The caveats got dropped for the dossier.

Nobody who'd looked at the 1990s history of the UN weapons inspectors in Iraq seriously believe Iraq didn't still have some chemical weapons kicking around. The inspectors got kicked out in around 97 and hadn't yet destroyed all the stocks they knew existed. Iraq also had the scientific know-how to rebuild the program, as it was pretty much entirely home-grown. The only question was, were those stockpiles in a usable condition and were they a threat.

Commonwealth Games brochure declares that England is now in Africa

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Happy

Re: Well, if we're not in Europe any more...

Sod closest! Where has the nicest weather?

Also, does any other part of the world have a song contest we can join? Preferably one a bit less naff than Eurovision.

Oh and maybe a regional football tournament that we might win..

2001 set the standard for the next 50 years of hard (and some soft) sci-fi

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: meanwhile, back at the film

When it came out, I hated the original.

I only changed my mind after seeing it on telly, a few years ago. I don't think it's great, but it is a hoot. And nicely bonkers. My disappointment that Verhoeven hadn't filmed the book had blinded me to the fun to be had watching his version.

I really liked the pisstake TV in both Starship Troopers and Robocop. Robocop had the best adverts, "Nuke 'em! The game for all the family!"

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Taking sci-fi seriously..

Quatermass I'll give you. I didn't enjoy it that much, and don't think it's that good, but it's interesting.

But I'm sorry, the Prisoner is rubbish. I watched a few episodes last year, and I think I watched it all when I was a student 25 years ago, as a friend is a fan and had it on tape. Most of it makes no sense. I've never really liked the Avengers, though it does have some good bits. I don't think it's anything special though.

I don't remember much of the magic roundabout. But there's some great kids TV that stands the test of time, which I hadn't even thought about. Most of the Hanna-Barbera stuff for example. Mutley! Do something!

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: meanwhile, back at the film

Maybe I'll give it a go. I've seen some of the second one, and it was pants. So never bothered with the threequel.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: When you don't understand something (because it's utterly lame)...

It depends what you want in a film? Films are art, and you can enjoy different aspects of them. I think 2001 is over-long and if I'm honest I only enjoyed the middle bit of the film. I'm not really interested in the grunting australopithecus or the alien contact at the end. But while I'm watching the stuff in space it's amazing. And incredibly well realised. And I like the film for that.

A bit like Blade Runner. I've never bought into the hype on that, and I think it's a very flawed film. It's taken Scott several bites at the cherry, with director's cuts to come to the film he thinks is best. But I'm still not sure it isn't better shorter and with a narrator, as a sort of post-apocalyptic Phillip Marlowe. I personally think Blade Runner 2049 is a much better written film - and much better at asking the questions about the difference between a human and a replicant (if any), than the original is.

However you can't deny the massive achievement of the visuals of both Blade Runner and 2001. Or the huge effect they had on so much films (and general culture) that followed.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Still Waiting...

No Stainless Steel Rat?

I'm not sure I want to see the big epic stuff on the big screen. Sure, if it works then I'd be happy as anything. But it's always more worrying that they'll spend all their time on the special effects and forget the plot and/or character. Ender's Game made me sad, for example - I can't imagine why anyone would try to film that.

So I'd like to see a bit of lighter sci-fi, that's now possible on normal film budgets, as special effects have got so much cheaper.

I'd love to see someone have a go at CJ Cherryh's Alliance-Union universe, and depress everybody properly. Mallory of Norway ought to make a nicely flawed lead character. Or Finity's End, which has got some great ideas about a generation born to war having to adjust to peace and the different lives of people born on ships, compared to those who live in one place.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Taking sci-fi seriously..

Was Star Trek really that well written? I have gone back and watched some of the original episodes now that they've been remastered. I particularly like how many bongos you can now hear in the soundtrack.

And I've revised my opinion of it all being rubbish. My abiding memory of watching it as a kid was always Spock mind melding with a silicon-based lifeform that looked like a rather thick pizza and hamming up the awesome dialogue, "The pain! The pain!" But going back there are a lot more thoughtful episodes than I remember.

But still, most episodes seem to be, crew meet bumpy headed aliens / female aliens in skimpy outfits, get captured / taken over / threatened, spend a bit of time thinking about it / flirting / trying to fix the ship, then do some handwaving about diverting auxilliary power or persuade the aliens to be nice.

I suppose I'm judging it harshly. There's no much TV from the 60s that stands up to modern stuff. And I'm not complaining about special effects now. So much of it is just plain badly written. I'm sure I've forgotten stuff, but Mash and the first 3 seasons of The Sweeney are the oldest TV shows that I can think of that still stand up today.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: meanwhile, back at the film

I'm not sure Starship Troopers needs the political theory. I was perfectly happy with the way the Verhoeven film parodied that, and I'd be equally happy with a film that cut it out entirely.

It was the military stuff that he got wrong. They're supposed to be a tiny force of elite troops using technology as a force multiplier. But the film has them as pretty rubbish troops using numbers to defeat the bugs - but just having fewer numbers. Given how crap their guns are, and how long it takes them to kill any bug shown in close-up, they should probably lose every engagement within the first few minutes. Surely the future could at least manage explosive bullets, even if it doesn't give them lasers?

Now special effects can keep up, I'd like to see the film done properly. Squads of 10 mobile infantry in powered suits. Everybody drops, everybody fights. And if you don't like the politics, you can just do it as a military story, which it works perfectly well as. Must dig my copy out and read it again.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

I'm not sure I totally buy that comment from the author. There have been plenty of long, mainstream films. Mainstream high-grossing films have been getting longer in recent years, not shorter.

I just looked it up, and Blade Runner 2049 is pretty much exactly the same length as 2001. 2 hours 40-something. Did very well at the cinema - and with the critics. OK, it's a film with more action - but you could still easily edit out 30 or more minutes of that film without losing any action or dialogue, because it spends quite a lot of time immersing you in its future vision. In a way that works really well.

Whereas I'd argue that 2001 could do with a bit of a trim. The immersing you in the whole space travel thing is brilliant, and I'd keep it. But did we really need all that time of australopithecus hitting each other with clubs and making funny noises? Could we not just have a quick montage and a voiceover/explanation to tell us that the monolith was assessing/training them? And get it over with in a minute or two?

Perhaps I'm not ingesting the right substances while watching it? Last time I saw it, was under the influence of tea and chocolate. And I spent the ape-time, making the tea. Although I admit that was years ago, so perhaps I should re-watch it before judging.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Silent Running...

I'd really love to have seen what Ridley Scott would have done with Dune. Or even better, rather than watching his nurdling around with Alien prequels, watch him do it now. With modern special effects. Still hard to do dramatically, as so much of the action happens in Paul's head - which is the thing the Lynch version really fell down on. I could ignore the crap special effects if the film worked in other ways.

Happy 100th birthday to the Royal Air Force

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Headmaster

Re: What about Martin Baker?

All that and you failed to mention Martin Baker's contributions to aircraft safety?

Can I be a pedant here. Martin Baker have done nothing for aircraft safety. Lots for pilot safety mind. But the aircraft do tend to crash once the drivers have left...

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Happy

Re: April's fool

The RAF is fictional. That's why they had to make all those films about them. It's a WWI April Fool that got out of hand, and nobody could admit it and lose face.

Surely those moustaches are just too odd to be believeable!

Doomed Chinese space lab Tiangong-1 crashes into watery Pacific grave

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: "confirmed reentry on April 1"

I believe it's still 1955 in Dartford...

Are you able to read this headline? Then you're not Julian Assange. His broadband is unplugged

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Another Way

It would disrupt our diplomatic relations with Ecuador. Which is the whole point of having embassies in the first place. He's not worth it.

Diplomats mostly hate this sort of thing, having fugitives hiding in their embassies, because of the inconvenience for them and their staff - and the fact it pisses off their host government. So they often try to shuffle people back out of the embassy as quickly as possible - or not even let them in. Though in this case, I think their ex-President dropped them in it - while Assange was interviewing him on telly.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: And it's paid for and I'm so grateful to be nowhere

I wholly approve of the gloating. He deserves it. I've no sympathy any more. He should go and face justice in Sweden, like the rest of us have to. He was the one who applied for residence there just before he got charged with rape, so he can't claim he doesn't trust their judicial system now. And he came to the UK of his own free will, which if he genuinely feared extradition to the US would have been the stupidest move going. So I don't buy that argument.

I do accept it's possible that he's paranoid enough to have an irrational fear of extradition. But it's also rather too convenient. And, by all accounts I've read, he seems to be a manipulative little shit - so I'm afraid I'm out of patience with the whole farce.

On the other hand, you're right about prison rape jokes. Not funny. Or classy. The much-missed ex-Moderatrix, lately of this parish, used to come down hard on that sort of thing.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Devil

Re: What's missing in all this discussion

Sack, brick, Thames, splash?

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Especially not with sandpaper...

There are 10 types of people in the world, but there is only one Melvyn

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Letter from American

And no, I'm not talking about The Proclaimers.

Alistair Cooke's. Radio 4 have put many/all (well nearly 1,000) of the things online. I think the later ones are a bit less impressive, though I still liked them. But as an interesting piece of commentary on US 20th Century history, many of them are great. After the first few hundred you might notice him repeating the odd story, but given he'd been doing the damned things for 40 years by that point (and had never heard of a podcast) I'd happily forgive him.

The Media Show is a good podcast too. But I'm still getting used to the new host, since Steve Richards died.

Oh, and on the subject of podcasts. Mike Duncan's 'History of Rome' and then 'Revolutions' are truly brilliant. Although the first few start a bit shakily - given he'd never cast his pod before.

And my new favourite is David Crowther's 'The History of England'. He started with the Romans, and is now up to Henry VIII - but he's been slowing down. Hard to do ten years in a single podcast, when there is so much more information. Though I believe he prefers to call them shedcasts.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Devil

Re: Not great for car radio

I reckon they might interrupt The Archers to give news of the impending species-ending asteroid strike. And a blessed release it will be for the listeners...

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: If you press litmus paper to Jim Al-Khalili, does it go blue?

More or Less is brilliant.

I love the fact that they explained government spending cuts and unemployment during the recent recession via the medium of making members of the Trumpton Fire Brigade redundent.

Then when prosititution got included in GDP figures it was back to Trumpton to find out what the ex-fireman was doing now that he'd found a new job...

I believe it was the piece on Cambridge Analytica that had many a Reg commentard outing themselves as Radio 4 listeners. Then this. It's almost like El Reg knows...

Java-aaaargh! Google faces $9bn copyright bill after Oracle scores 'fair use' court appeal win

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Pint

Re: Bifurcating a spectrum often leads to problems

Surely we need a system where they can both lose?

It's pretty clear from Google's internal correspondence that they knew they were pulling a fast one, that it was all a bit dodgy, but they'd just go ahead anyway. It was cheaper, quicker and got them what they wanted. They were taking someone else's system and using it for things that Sun didn't want.

On the other hand, there are reasons why this should be possible.

So in a perfect world, both companies will spend a fortune on lawyers, in a case that causes them huge management headaches and goes on for years and years. Making both of them look bad. Then ends in an inconclusive judgement where they've both lost a fortune.

So here's to endless appeals, and huge retainers and refreshers for m'learned friends! Cheers!

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Devil

Re: Why are Oracle always being such a bunch of

Have you seen how many yachts Larry Ellison owns? Well, he "needs" some more.

Now you know why.

Cambridge Analytica 'privatised colonising operation', not a 'legitimate business', says whistleblower

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Is it just who they helped?

Labour under Corbyn and Obama did pretty well electorally with supposedly brilliantly targetted Facebook campaigns. Though they may have been run more ethically. Or not. We shall see. The common problem is Facebook.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Devil

Re: Sickening

Do you watch the cricket live - or on tape?

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Re : "described Wylie as a charlatan"

I'm not sure we should be digging out our "establishment" conspiracy theories quite yet.

After all, the establishment was almost totally for remain. So this could be the perfect opportunity to dig out a reason to re-run the referendum. The polls may have moved a bit remain-y too - though who knows what a second campaign would be like. Horrible, I suspect. The first one wasn't exactly high quality...

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
Happy

Re: a goverment elected by 5 year olds

If we're going to have a government elected by 5 year-olds, does this mean I'll finally get my free owl?

Curse you Miliband for losing that election!

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: The BBC

On the News page on the Beeb's website, at the top is a story about Facebook changing their privacy policy. Which references the whole Cambridge Analytica brouhaha. And has further links. So it is mentioned. I also saw the pink haired chap on Newsnight last night, so again they do cover it. Haven't heard seen any radio or telly bulletins in the last couple of days though, so can't speak for that.

I suspect that most people won't have picked up on it yet, other than maybe the implications for Facebook privacy. Because so far it's untested allegations. And most people tend to ignore most political stories, as a general rule. Whereas the Facebook data-leakage story is real and admitted, and affects their data.

This is the kind of story that rumbles on for months before it becomes big news. The leave press may well mostly ignore it and the Guardian run two stories a day on why Brexit is bad / wrong / evil and the referendum should be ignored, overturned or re-run. So this will probably just look like more of that for a bit to the non-engaged voter. It's amazing how litttle single news stories move the polls, and even when one does, they tend to return to where they were before after a week or two.

Google lobbies hard to derail new US privacy laws – using dodgy stats

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: If Google is *really* a "service" then some people choose not to be known on it.

Our precioussssss databasesesesssss.

Manchester Arena attack: National Mutual Aid Telephony system failed

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Content Guru...

Am I being prejudiced here, in saying that I would hesitate to do business with any company who had the word "guru" in their name?

Well not quite true. Our company have sold services to a few sikh schools / temples. Obvious places you'd expect to see the word turn up.

SAP Anywhere is gonna be absolutely nowhere: We're 'sunsetting' this service, biz tells punters

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: Not quite the same meaning

I noticed that, and would agree with you. Though SAP haven't exactly used clear wording. And it's still a shit offer - with only 30 days notice.

I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

Re: OMFG

30 days notice truly is shocking. And totally unreasonable. 3 months would be short notice - 1 month is insane.