Re: If they are attacking Apple for not allowing Chrome
That in the end this proposal has probably come too late. If it becomes law you will have a choice of WebKit, Blink, and Firefox (dwindling market share).
15423 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
If you just want a (mostly) working computer and aren't interested in why component manufacturers don't distribute code or drivers to OS developers except MS and Apple then just keep the default Windows 11 install and be happy. You're obviously not the target audience for an open source OS.
At that time, Debian did not include the Firefox logo as it was not re-distributable (trademarked by Mozilla). Therefore they changed the logo for another one. Mozilla didn't like this and told them to distributing Firefox without its logo and to submit all changes made to the codebase to Mozilla for approval, so Debian changed the name of the browser as well.
But this issue has been resolved for several years now.
How the BSD licence help fix the problem with closed firmware blobs? All it does is allow the manufacturer to copy open-source BSD-licensed code and paste it in to the propriety code and then not distribute anything. How's that going to help the device work with an open-source OS (Linux, BSD, or anything else)?
Practically all Basics tokenised keywords into one byte. Single key entry might have reduced code size in the ZX80's 4K ROM where every byte mattered but by the time it got to the Spectrum's 16K ROM it was a bit silly... although if you wanted to learn to program having all the keywords in front of you and the computer syntax checking everything when you hit enter helped.
I beg to differ, and there was still colour clash in low-res mode, although there were sprites on top of this so it was less noticeable.
Issue 1 16K Spectrums had space for a plug-in 32K* daughterboard. Issue 2 and above didn't.
Seem some 16Ks were returned 48Ks with memory problems in the top 32K so they had the top 32K disabled by Sinclair in the factory before being sent out for sale again as a 16K. Those are the ones which would have had to be returned to Sinclair for the upgrade if you were two scared to solder the memory yourself.
Upgrading a 16K Spectrum to 48K
* Actually 64K but with cheaper RAM chips that failed testing as 64K but were usable as 32K. Because Sinclair, gawd bless 'im.
why doesn't the conglomerate just offer a barrow load of cash to the washing machine vendor for their chip inventory
In the medium and long term, the washing machine manufacturer wants to manufacturer washing machines. They can't do that without their chips, they'll either have to diversify into a new market (expensive, slow) or go out of business.
"the user shouts a lot, and appears to have problems with 2 dogs barking which might make it harder to understand him when un-muted".
And:
Telemetry is NOT "we are recording your audio and sending it to the bad guys".
That Mitchell and Webb Look - Are we the baddies?.mp4
Holding recordings of conferences to find out if it's picking up dogs barking is a no no. Servers can be owned, recordings can be downloaded by blackhats and security agencies. Cisco are just going to do it the old fashioned way and eat their own dogfood, and that way they'll have more control over recording conditions anyway (who knows why it's picking up dogs barking in the background in random stored recordings, perhaps the caller works in an animal sanctuary and it's working as expected).
The first time they used a centralised contact match server with phone ID, location, and Bluetooth and it couldn't run in the background on iPhones and hammered the battery on Android.
Then they tried again with the Apple/Google contract tracing API.
The second time, they wanted to collect QR codes at venues in the same track and trace app, which was location data, so it wasn't approved by either Apple or Google.
If you flew you needed to fill in a passenger location form to enter the destination country. This has your passport number, an e-mail address, and a phone number.
In other countries this data was collected, processed, and held by their health service/department, in the UK this data was collected, processed, and held by the Home Office.
Enough said.
Clearly you've not been reading or listening to the news recently or you'd know that being "non-dom" doesn't mean you don't pay taxes at all. You have to declare *where* you are domiciled for tax purposes. That makes it harder to avoid the taxes where you *are* domiciled.
I didn't say that at all. Please re-read.
Then read this:
How the UK’s non-dom status works
And to spell it out, you are a UK tax resident, you declare you wish to avail yourself of non-domiciled status, offer supporting evidence (e.g. you are from another country and intend to return, or you inherit this status from a parent - this is actually a thing).
You are still tax resident in the UK, from your home country's point of view (e.g. India) you are not tax resident.
You end up paying tax on your UK income to the UK, £30K/year for any and all worldwide income to the UK, and you don't pay inheritance tax to the UK.
She would pay tax on Indian earnings (if she has any) to India but that's it.
Now imagine she also has income in the Cayman Islands, just to choose somewhere random on the globe. Works out quite well, doesn't it?
The whole non-dom status was designed by the last Labor government (surprised?) to attract rich foreign people to live in this country without the fear of the tax authorities digging into their tax affairs to see whether there is a buck or two more to extract.
No, what Labour changed was charging £30K/year for non-domiciled status, it's been around for 200 years.
1. She is a billionaire, that requires a revenue stream.
2. Who says taxes are due in India? She is a UK resident, she is tax resident in the UK, and her status is "non-domiciled" - that doesn't mean she's an Indian tax resident. "Non-domiciled" is just a way of reducing a UK tax bill with a flimsy excuse, basically a hangover from the British empire that is still alive today.
Neither her or her husband has categorically stated there is income in India, they've only talked about "international income".
3. Seriously?
If you highlight Snow Leonard's UI as being retrograde, could you please highlight what is an improvement about Monterey? As far as I can see there are just a series of arbitrary UI decisions (removal of color which helps distinguish areas, removal of title bars, hiding UI elements until you know how to make them appear a la Windows 8 charms bar), removal of long-standing UI workflows such as Save As, iDevice-isation of the UI, dumbing-down of the bundled apps and iWork, then finally for the coupe de grace running iOS apps with Catalyst which brings even more alien UI elements onto the macOS desktop.
Mac's not that good either, take a look at some of what's been lost since Snow Leopard (still the bar by which all future versions of macOS are judged and found wanting).
Why would Hide My Email not work with El Reg's profile edit option?
Safari on your iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and Mac when filling in a web form or creating an account for an app or website that does not support Sign in with Apple
However it seems a government of ravingly inadequate fools who are solely out for their own pockets and in the service of their class is what the electorate wants and they like them and they choose not to get rid of them. It's a sad state of affairs when spitfires and bunting outweigh being a modern functioning boring country where things work.