Re: Sad
What about that doorbell scoping your place out on the opposite side of the road?
15445 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Because apparently he can't talk to his employees without getting a wrong answer, misunderstanding them, and/or firing them, so now he's asking random people who use Twitter how it works.
One is CRUD on a data orientated view, the other is calling functions by name and passing parameters.
If you wanted a generic way of calling REST APIs and RPC APIs, you could use the term... API.
None of us here have any idea whether it's a SQL database or flat files or in-memory storage behind the scenes, and it would make not a blind bit of difference to the REST interface, the web frontend or the Android app as REST is data orientated.
Now Musk's claim was the app was poorly batching > 1000 RPCs to render the home timeline. The app guy said it was bollocks and other guy confirmed it and a minute of thought would tell you that if an app were batching > 1000 REST calls then that would be a spectacularly bad design that would have been thrown out right near the start of the development process.
Then Musk went on to pull microservices and stopped people who were using SMS authentication from logging in. In a complicated service such as Twitter you do actually need microservices or Twitter would have to go down every time a new feature was deployed.
It seems Musk is the Stack Overflow programmer.
Given that the NHS is going to export everything it's got to Palantir, there is also a total failure to recognise the need to comply with the legislation at government level too.
As usual, world beating (as they are so keen on saying) on paper, the subjects of the legislation have no idea about it or, worse, they do know about it but know they'll get away with not following it as nobody lifts a finger to enforce compliance on the ground. See also: Environment Agency.
If there is no postal voting, people would have to vote at their polling station.
It seemed the other AC had an objection to the entire concept of postal voting. I don't know if you are the same AC, but I did not know that everyone got a postal vote without requesting one in the US (or perhaps it varies by state). The requirement to request a postal vote seems reasonable, I'm not arguing against that.
Likewise "early voting" also strikes me as a bit odd and makes security more difficult, but each to their own.
Postal voting is a thing all over the developed world. Or would you rather send everyone home around election time... sounds a bit authoritarian.
If you have a proprietary messaging system then that by design cause a network effect and therefore there will eventually be one "too big to fail" winner in each area like Twitter or WhatsApp. Nobody could come along and make money out of a FOSS network like Mastodon.
Google worked this out and de-XMPPified gtalk.
He's just fired 4400 out of 5500 contractors this weekend on top of the in-house employees last weekend and started an argument with a senator on the subcommittee on communications and technology. Perhaps he has an interest in the popcorn-industrial complex that we don't know about.
There is also the COP27 app.
The useless Google Play info says both that there is third party data collection and that no data is collected, and no mention of e.g. passport info is made.
So say the very stable genius pays $500k/yr to attract an employee who want to spend 16 hours a day in the office (how is this even legal, but never mind, it's the US)... what avantage is there over paying $250k/yr for two employees to work 8 hour days?
It seems to me that's not the deal... the deal is Musk isn't paying overtime to those unlucky enough not to get fired.
Nissan made the world's first Li-ion battery powered car in 1996. Telsa took the same idea and bolted on ham-fisted software which made it play space invaders and kill their drivers as they drive into the sides of lorries, but it's okay to do that because Musk wants his software beta tested. He also calls it autopilot when it's anything but.
As for Space X, we get to see new rocket designs blow up on the launchpad instead of boring old stick-in-the-mud NASA taking longer with the design and aborting the launch.
For some reason, the billionaire friend of Putin really doesn't want people to know they're replying to or DMing the Internet Research Agency.
Imagine how fewer rocket blow-ups in SpaceX or Tesla car crashes there would have been if someone normal were in charge.
List of absolutely real genuine accounts tweeting here which won't scare his income source away, not at all.
In brief, how it works is this: you install WSL from the Microsoft Store, then install Ubuntu in it. [...] The new app works because WSL2 supports systemd, and Snap requires systemd.
The aim of working round planned obsolescence is worthy, but if there is a critical mass of everything that's wrong with modern IT, then this is has probably reached it.
Closest thing to the old man yells at cloud icon on the right.
I wonder when Esther Crawford pinned that tweet to the top of her timeline.
Airbnb does indeed provide what they want, until it doesn't.
I know you're going to claim relying on stories getting around is much better than proper regulation though, because that's your thing.
I'm pretty sure it works like this for every H1 release:
1. Add new unwanted advertising feature nobody asked for.
2. Bury an opt-out setting somewhere in Settings using a dark pattern methodology, so that some pesky regulator somewhere in the EU can say people don't have the choice.
3. If not enough people find it and opt out, success! It gets added to this year's H1 release.
Windows 8.1 had quite a good set of parental controls which worked with local accounts.
Windows 10's is dumbed down, needs Microsoft accounts for all members of the family instead of local logins (kids get email addresses too), and the kids log in with the same password as their email address. There's nothing like teaching complex passwords right from the start.
Something tells me Big Tech aren't exactly on our side.
From the horse's mouth:
The Bill, most notably, would:
- place a “sunset” on REUL – causing most, but not all, of it to expire at the end of 2023
- enable, via statutory instrument, most REUL (if it takes the form of legislative instruments) to be exempted from the sunset
- enable the “sunset” to be postponed (for some but not all REUL) until as late as 23 June 2026, via statutory instrument
- rename any remaining retained EU law after 2023 “assimilated law”
- formally abolish, for wholly domestic law purposes, the principle of supremacy and other general principles of EU law after 2023
- enable the effects of supremacy and general principles of EU law to be preserved or recreated in specific cases, via statutory instrument
- give the UK courts a new legal framework for reconciling inconsistent sources of law when they include those of EU origin, which ministers can influence via statutory instrument
- grant a suite of delegated powers to UK ministers and devolved authorities to revoke, restate, replace or update REUL/assimilated law by statutory instrument
- remove or downgrade existing forms of Parliamentary scrutiny of statutory instruments when they propose to modify or revoke law of EU origin
- expand the permitted use of Legislative Reform Orders (LROs) so that they can revoke retained direct EU legislation
- abolish the Business Impact Target in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (SBEEA)
But I fear we are straying from the subject at hand.
What does the Bill do?
Under the Bill’s sunset provisions, retained EU law set out in secondary legislation will expire at the end of 2023, unless the Government decides that it should be preserved and remain part of UK law. The Government may also decide to postpone the expiry of any EU-derived secondary legislation to a later date, but not later than 23 June 2026. It can also decide to restate legislation, replace it or revoke it (without replacing it). Any replacement legislation must not increase the regulatory burden.
Then there's this heading a bit further down.
Impact on employment law?
And three paragraphs under this heading, which you may read in their entirety.
There you go.
Have you forgot about the great book burning planned for the 31st of December 2023? This will affect employment law.
If you just got a few lines of text then open in a new private tab to see the whole article.
When put on gardening leave the usual thing is you're on leave for the rest of your notice period, i.e. it's linked to your notice (especially the way Twitter did it, i.e you're fired, your account is deleted, and your badge doesn't work), and the employee could argue that revoking gardening leave requires the company to revoke notice of termination as well.
There is also the possibility, at least in the UK, of suing the employer if they put you on gardening leave for not having a gardening leave clause in the contract. So that's another card the employee could threaten to play.
Finally there is working to rule, aka "quiet quitting", and if the company decides not to pay compensation for working the stupid hours their colleagues do, the employer would need to show exactly what clause in the contract they've broken.