Re: Urgent push towards fingerprints as login of choice now explained
There really does need to be password & fingerprint lock.
15445 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
They are both the same in that they've got words.
Would anyone wipe their arse with the Daily Mail, having cheaper more comfortable alternatives available for cheaper in the supermarket?
I wouldn't wipe my arse with The Register either. Too sharp, might get an electrical shock.
Does an encyclopaedia do daily news or try to use it to change the political landscape of a country? Yeah, by change I mean poison. If you disagree with me you're an enemy of the people. Get the pitchforks ready, we're going after one of the branches of government.
Google put forward a challenge to the advertising and marketing executives to help populate YouTube with more content that combats ISIS propaganda. [...] "We don't believe that censoring the existence of ISIS on Google, YouTube or social media will dampen their impact really," Google's David Drummond told the same audience.
So the bedroom jihadist is going to watch a beheading, an targeted ad will pop up which reads "PSA: Why beheading people is a bad, mmmkay", and he's going to click through to another YouTube video which explains why all the people he's just watched have a part in killing someone are naughty?
This is better than removing snuff videos? Stop the world, I want to get off.
And to be fair to Oracle (let's suspend opinion for one moment) they're saying that the appeal is not a straight re-run.
They've made more shit up, then?
If APIs turn out to be copyrightable then the IT industry will spontaneously implode in a puff of lawyers because the history of computing is based on taking what's already there and improving upon it slightly.
Apparently there's a lot of margin on those lettuces which food producers will be only too happy to soak up for us.
Only they're not exempt, their data will be hoovered up anyway but not shown when searched for later, because it's extremely difficult to record everything everyone does inside .uk except for 650-odd people.
As this data is held by the ISP, they need something big to threaten then them with.
Just were do you think you can find even 'half-way neutral' reporting?
Perhaps they are neutrally reporting that this is a clusterfuck?
Neutral means publishing articles based on the complete range of facts available, not bending the article's text to be neutral even though the facts don't back this up.
However selling a machine with kodi + plugins + hardware becomes illegal... why?
One thing that's surprisingly missing in Vivaldi (or I haven't found it) is the web page language settings. Not even Firefox has knocked that on the head yet... touch wood.
Why is all software sabotaged by its devs? Perhaps there's no handing down to new programmers of 'things we rejected because we found out they were crap'. Then 20 years later we get Windows 10.
The point is, if this ends up happening, you'll have a new intermederiary for streaming services who will end up just as hated as the traditional ones.
However I doubt this will happen as it's easy enough to sign up to as many streaming services as you like, or just sign up to watch Stranger Things (perhaps the first month is free) then stop.
Well I don't know where you are, but where I am songs suddenly turn grey in my Spotify playlists (only happens if you set it that way in settings, otherwise they just disappear and you probably wouldn't notice), entire albums disappear, and there are region lockouts too.
What's going to happen next is the stick will be sold with a bare version of Kodi on it and the shop will give an address that you stick into Kodi which downloads everything else.
That'll be when they decide just go for TV sticks loaded with Kodi.
If they could come up with one shared service, with all the content, and they received their money by content watched (like royalties to different artists/labels with music on spotify) it would be a much better solution.
Ah, like a cable or satellite provider like Virgin or Sky you mean. Hang on...
Which ones? Pollution, electrical interference, workers' rights, drug testing, medical standards, building standards, vehicle construction standards, aeroplane construction standards, food standards, education standards, equality, animal welfare, telecoms regulation, etc... etc...
You can't just travel back in time to 1970 by ripping stuff up, the world is more complicated 50 years later.
People who should know better are saying it's a good idea. It sounds good for five seconds until you think about it.