If you uncheck sync provider notifications then you will also not know when your cloud storage is full or similar problems.
Essentially they stuck adverts on OneDrive desguised as info or warning messages.
15445 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Anyone who's topped up their mobile data bundle on the go only to find the data swallowed up by background sync processes in minutes – as happened to your reporter recently – will be glad to find that OneDrive is now more aware that it's on a metered connection.
OneDrive stops wasting pennies but updates that MS considers sooo important now get pushed down metered connections. Not sure if this is an improvement, at least it was your data before.
1. I wouldn't be so sure that data on a factory reset phone couldn't be read, unless it were encrypted (in which case the key is thrown away when you factory reset effectively making the data unreadable).
2. An obviously non-new phone with a new shiny out-of-the-box software experience might be grounds for further questioning, with rubber gloves.
Sophos generally like it, Naked Security, Mr. Robot.
Either they got his ICR which shows new connections to WhatsApp's servers at that time or they did as the Daily Mail did and added his number to someone else's contact list and got his last online time or both.
I imagine the later arrests were made based on phone calls and standard text messages from his phone, not WhatsApp.
Is his WhatsApp meta data or contact list available? Possibly not since end-to-end encryption rolling out. If the contact list is available then it's something WhatsApp (the company) can provide.
Do they have his phone? I'd like to think that the answer is they don't because if they do then they have everything they need but those deaths are being using as an excuse to go after e2e encryption anyway.
It could be anything. Good cop/bad cop, or both singing off the same page, genuinely believing that you can have secure encrypted data with the government able to look at it at any time they want. I suppose PPEs from Oxford have a magical thinking module.
You are making a distinction where there is none. Building a system which allows a third party access to messages means that it can be compromised.
The fact that a wonderful cryptographic module only decrypted the messages when it was told to by the rest of the (compromised) system and the encryption on the messages was not brute forced is not important.
Major General Jonathan Shaw said decrypting social media messages would see terrorists use other secure methods to communicate
Mr/Ms cupboard,
It's not really safe. How would messages (now stored on WhatsApp's servers instead of deleted upon reception) be read by law enforcement?
a) The certificate is kept by WhatsApp and law enforcement log into a special server which means the messages are only protected by a username and password or b) the certificate is given to law enforcement and they are in control of it.
Both methods can be compromised by malware or leaks.
Presumably if you had a dishwasher with a clock, the "finish by" time could be set in a similar way as the "start time" delay, by holding down one button and repeatedly pressing another. That's if you really are unable to calculate a delay time - 1.5 or 2 hours or however long the washing cycle is - at least a couple of hours more for the warm air to dry them.
Then again, this kind of feature is aimed at people who cannot set clocks on kitchen appliances and probably have UPnP on their routers and will never run a security update in their life unless their computer or phone bludgeons them into it (note all the missing devices from that list), so it's all going to end in tears anyway.
I have indeed used Linux. Mint is nearly there but the graphical style and feel is a little bit lacking. Ubuntu is horrible as are plain Gnome and KDE. I may look at Fedora 25 one day if only because it has done us the favour of taking X11 out back and having it shot.
How do I test it? By downloading to a VM, running it, toggling a few settings maximum. If it's no good out of the box then life is too short to waste.
Which commercial GUI do I like? I can live with Windows 7, I like Mac apart from keyboard accessibility where Windows has it beat.
Mostly websites, but desktop applications often suffer from having an HTML interface shoved into it for no good reason so you too can enjoy incremental rendering of non-standard GUI widgets.
Not that there is really a standard any more, just look at Windows 10 which looks like a kid went mad with a template stencil.
The Daily Mail's website is one of the most profitable there is, so it can be argued that it has successfully made the transition from print to online. And you can see the quality journalism on the right sidebar which has enabled it to do that...
You say do not read uninitialized memory, I say that memory's mapped to hardware device so I don't need to initialise it.
You say do not access an object outside of its lifetime, I say have you not heard of RAII?
You say a lambda object must not outlive any of its reference captured objects, I say I know when to pass by value instead.
You say do not rely on the value of a moved-from object, I say you don't need to because you've just used move from to quickly create a new object and can now use this object for something else without all the expensive object creation cost.
You say use valid iterator ranges, I say there are iterators to do that. If you don't use them, that's your choice.
You say C++ lets you shoot yourself in the foot, I say be clever enough not to aim at your foot in the first place.
Given the inherent coherency of Skype and the inherent coherency of Lync/Skype for Business, I doubt you could mash them together to get anything even approaching coherency.
Lync shoves conversations into another program (Outlook), loses a packet and starts inserting panicky messages into the conversation about your message may not have been delivered and look up error code 0, and forgets groups as quickly as they're made. Skype is, well, Skype.
Nokia released Symbian 3 in 2010 and followed it up with Symbian Anna and Belle. So maybe three years late, but the N8 also released in 2010 compared favourably to the iPhone 4, which you had to hold the right way if you wanted to make a call and had a rather naff camera compared to the N8's 20MP full HD one.
Then Elop came along and burnt the platform.
Unfortunately apps like K9 Mail have enough problems working under Android 7 already as it breaks the push IMAP connection unless you change some settings. I assume Android O will make things more difficult still.
Whether Google would want to fix this is another question. They'd be happy if everyone used gapps.