I don't recall seeing a conditional access module in every receiver or TV I've come across and there isn't one in my Freesat box either.
The CI+ slot in the back of your TV. Unless it's a small TV it'll have it.
15423 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
This produced one Mail Online headline that saw Whittaker pleading with Who snowflakers not to be "scared" of her agenda.
It's okay, the website has nothing to do with the newspaper, it's just chance that the Daily Mail and the Mail Online are the same building. The nutters in the comments there aren't real people and don't e.g. affect election outcomes.
Amstrad seemed convinced there was a new untapped market of people willing to use a Spectrum for business if only the right computer was launched, in addition to those that already used it for that with Microdrives and the Disciple/Plus D, so the +3 (odd 3" discs Sugar bought from the back of a lorry, CP/M support, and incompatibilities with previous models) came out.
Then he put the Sinclair badge on generic PCs, ensuring that absolutely nobody would buy them either.
SA stands for Still Available.
I dread to think how much £29.59 would be in 80's pocket money.
systemd
with faint praise
Not only do they not use C++, but they insist on an object orientated-like toolkit in C.
This is possible, but they decided not to use types, only void *s. This makes development slow and bug prone. It's pretty much the worst way you could choose to implement a toolkit.
You might complain about Qt but it's lightyears ahead of ETL.
Other posts on the same site say that Samsung management ignore non-Koreans and they use Excel spreadsheets to diff source code. Their working culture is pretty bad.
There won't be much to salvage from this wreck...
And if they do piss off the whole of the EU there will be no transitional period either, unless the EU's position in March 2019 is "we feel sorry for you, negotiation's over, you've got two more years to sort things out before you leave, pull your finger out".
How can a system that was supposed to come online in December 2020 and not designed to handle EU exports be ready two years earlier (January 2019) and handle EU exports?
Given the negotiations haven't finished, the spec isn't known yet. We don't know what's going to happen about the Irish border.
The UK is set up for a train wreck due to incompetent government.
Oh $DEITY, it's back-to-front time again. Net neutrality is strengthening regulation. It's everyone playing by the same rules, not bandwidth sold to the highest corporate bidder that quarter meaning people will never see your video without buffering unless it's on YouTube.
(Obligatory addition, as is so often necessary: QoS is not anti-net neutrality, it's setting the technical rules by which things are transported so they arrive at their destination in the most useful way for the user otherwise whatever it is being transported it's just wasted bandwidth. E-mail doesn't need to be realtime, games do, audio and video needs to not buffer every 10 seconds, interactive terminal sessions need to be interactive.)
No, because that makes the assumptions that the property will be continuously occupied for the lifetime of the loan and that all the occupants in that period of time will be willing to fork out for fibre.
Not everything is guaranteed in life. Loans have interest rates to take this into account.
If the new occupant says "15Mbps is more than enough, no fibre for me thanks" they won't be paying either.
Perhaps it could be done like water meters, once the change has been made, there's no going back. Someone could contract a voice-only or slow line, but it'd be fibre nonetheless.
(I didn't downvote.)
For Openreach/an ISP to fund that would be exceedingly difficult. To stand any realistic prospect of breaking even on the install you'd need to be tying the consumer into a 5-10 year contract which almost no residential user is likely to agree to.
The bit of the cable that goes from the property to the cabinet has to be paid for, this is an ongoing cost that could switch from ISP to ISP as the customer does, n'cest pas?
Unfortunately this would require a huge loan behind it all but you can't have everything.
If I could go off on a tangent for a moment, it seems to me that Indian bureaucracy, descended as it is from British bureaucracy, is only doing what British bureaucracy would do if it thought it could get a way with it.
However British bureaucracy is having a go at it with the proposed ID cards for EU citizens database and your story serves as a warning as to how it could go wrong.
It'd be interesting to know how many in the upper echelons of the Indian civil service are Oxford PPE educated or similar.
And now, back to your scheduled programme...
The only Google apps I've got on my phone are Play Store, Play Services, and Translate. In those three, settings are set to the most private possible (not very much I know, this is Google) and the fewest notifications possible. I use a dedicated Google account for that one phone.
So I don't get nagged to review businesses or upload photos or whatever they want to crowdsource today.
“The PRA expects firms to adopt a proportionate approach when assessing their non-affirmative exposures. The firm’s underwriting and risk management functions should play a key role in leading this effort,” it said.
More of a key role than the IT dept?
Seems like box ticking to me.
The software could not let the call centre drone get to do things if the customer doesn't get the password right.
If the customer's forgotten the password it could go on to other security questions, again not letting the drone go on to later screens unless the customer gets most or all of them right.
And it should certainly not allow repeated spamming of the call centre.
If there is some doubt about the customer then the drone should be able to play back previous calls to the call centre to compare voices, check if the caller is calling from their own home or mobile, and so on.
There are certainly ways to tighten up things.
Wasn't it more like...
We don't want the precious. That would not be free and democratic.
Silicon Valley must collaborate with us and show us the precious or else.
But we don't want the precious. That would not be free and democratic.
... and similar cognitive dissidence?