Re: Top Xmas tip
But what if I'm a sysadmin of MS products and need booze just to get through the day?
15423 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Former Facebook executive: social media is ripping society apart
Chamath Palihapitiya, former vice-president of user growth, expressed regret for his part in building tools that destroy ‘the social fabric of how society works’
Unfortunately a) it's pretty fucking late now to realise all the bad things you've done once you've slurped everyone's data and b) Facebook is not going to shut up shop.
It's all innocent fun until lack of data oversight becomes an issue, as it did when a Twitter contractor shut down President Trump's Twitter account for 11 minutes last month.
It turned out the contractor in question received a complaint about one of El Presidente's tweets and acted upon it following Twitter's own T&Cs, which is arguably more fair than the lack of data oversight which is keeping the account open despite whatever is posted so Twiter gets more hits.
Well it's not going to happen. Thanks to DD's outburst on Sunday, the EU have hardened their language. The UK will not be a member and will not have observer status on any EU body or agency.
And to think that I once thought he was one of the small amount of decent politicians.
Voice shortcodes are run by companies who have agreements with all operators.
Presumably one company had 2xxx or 25xx and Shazam went with them. It was easier than a premium rate number. You rang one number which was easy to remember, it lasted exactly 30 seconds, were charged a fixed amount, and everyone got their slice.
Find your perfect non-discerning audience, game YouTube's algorithms, generate thousands of videos, everybody's in on it and nobody gives a toss except some primary caregivers who don't matter because in the end it's all about upholding the pretence that that advertising is useful in some way and there's money in that, damn it.
As a My First Social Network, Nintendo got it about right. It was moderated to within an inch of its life and if you got banned it meant you had to use a new Network ID which you didn't want to do as they are a limited number per console. It turned out to be a nice social network (mostly) about gaming.
Shame it just got knocked on the head, they didn't want to carry on with it on the Switch.
But a Silicon Valley business will never give us with a nice social network because they're obsessed with doing everything with dubiously-effective algorithms instead of realising that they need spend money enploying humans to proactively moderate.
Or we dont put up a border. If the EU do they can have troubles if they want but why do we need to?
Immigration, customs, the usual thing that all countries or trading blocs in the world do.
The EU are banning us from access to the SM and it is their right if they want.
May banned the UK from access to the SM in the Lancaster House speech, she ruled it out then.
The EU is refusing to negotiate, they have said this openly and without shame.
I believe there has to be agreement on three other items first. How can you decide what kind of trade you're doing if you don't even know what the NI/Ireland border looks like first?
Cancelling brexit would be a stupid idea to appease the unappeasable and undemocratic.
"If a democracy cannot change its mind, it ceases to be a democracy." - David Davis.
Although it means when we have an election we can actually vote for changes without the EU being in the way. We dont let the US or China run our regulations.
We won't be able to change regulations. We can't make our own TV or electrical standards, we'll be tagging on the coat-tails of the rest of the continent. As part of the EU we help set these standards.
Ouch what a huge mistake you made. I assume you mean brexit bill which is the EU wish list of fantasy and stupidity. Firstly it is ment to be for the commitments the EU has already made that they want us to pay toward. Which means the bill is the cost of being in the EU not getting out of the EU and that cost can only increase.
It's for the commitments the UK agreed to fund and signed off.
Second if there is no deal we dont have to give them anything at all (we can choose to if we so wish but its up to us if we want to). So the EU automatically get nothing. No money, no border and no special rights over their citizens unless they negotiate.
Yeah. How do you think the UK will attract inward investment after that?
What concerns me is the people struggling with this concept is the EU and remain supporters.
That's why the PM had to be told in Parliament that there would be no transitional period if the UK crashed out.
It is a real proof of concept that if you so badly dont want to do something you can make poor excuses not to do it. But just because you dont want to leave the EU for whatever actual reason you are chucking out some of the most laughable problems that you are creating then claiming they are unsolvable. So far I have solved those problems pretty quick and easy.
If you consider a sort of collective national suicide as a way of solving problems, yes.
Since 2008 the BoE and Treasury have been trying to reduce the strength of the pound to recover from the recession and bring the country back to a normal state before the next one hits. After the referendum result the currency fell sparking inflation and prompting the BoE to prepare for a rate rise. As a result the property market to stop rushing away from affordability.
Wages are stagnant, zero hours contracts are through the roof, inflation is up, your average millennial doesn't have the money to buy a house, and food bank usage in the UK has never been higher. Glad it's working out for you though.
The UK now out of the EU is starting to move that way.
Sorry, what was that? Did you really write that? Do you have the remotest clue what's going on? Or to put it succinctly, WTF?
The EU is years behind the recovery.
That'll be why the ECB is winding up QE next year.
And after the clusterfuck that is this week in politics in the UK, there really is no reason for Brexit as it is envisioned. A year and a half later and we find out there has been not one in-depth study and the cabinet hasn't even been able to talk to work out what kind of exit from the EU they want, the whole charade was brought to a screeching halt by the DUP, and there's two days to sort it out otherwise the next EU summit will be missed. But when you're in the Brexit suicide cult and are about to drink the kool-aid, I guess you've got a different perspective.
Ahh so this is only an insult against the Irish. Thats ok then
No, it's only an insult against the DUP.
And are you getting them onside with this?
I really think I have very little bearing on the Brexit negotiations.
What is your side of this? Do you want a border or no?
I am able to recognise that a Brexit which includes exiting the CU and SM logically means there will be border which in turn means the Troubles will restart. Therefore the UK's best options are cancelling Brexit or staying in the CU and SM.
Ok. The point is still pretty solid that we voted brexit and so we are doing brexit. No amount of goalpost moving negates that.
Not really. If as Davis says it's "regulatory alignment" for all the UK then that's as good as the EEA. All Brexit was then was a vote to give a lot of money to the EU, to have no say in the SM and CU rules, and to pay yearly EEA subs which are a little cheaper but get you much less.
And at that point, many people will start to ask the question, "why not stop Brexit"?
Part of the reason for Brexit as proposed by Leave was taking back control and slowing down immigration. How do you propose that gets done without a border?
Every country has a customs border except for those countries in a customs union who have a customs border around the outer edge of the countries that make up the union.
What would happen if, as threatened by the likes of Farage, the whole of Turkey went through Northern Ireland, do you think the DUP, the Tories, and people who voted leave would be okay with that?
Oh wow is this a religious thing now?
I didn't make it up and it's a good name for a bunch of backward God bothering types who want abortion to remain illegal and homosexuality to be illegal.
"Won the vote" is enough. Where do you get 1% from? The difference was greater.
Your quote is wrong, you've changed the text. 1% was the DUP's share of the vote in the elections and as remain won in NI, they cannot be said to be representing NI.
NI doesn't want a border. The DUP said they didn't want a border. The government struck a deal without a border. The DUP, who don't represent NI, rejected the deal and forced the government to backtrack.
There is no way you can describe the DUP as anything other than a minority, and they don't even represent wishes of the part of the UK which they claim to represent.
By definition a customs union has a hard border. It has to, otherwise goods could go from the countries outside the CU over the border to the countries inside of the CU avoiding any and all tariffs and controls. If the UK wanted out of the CU, this is the logical result.
Ireland is an independent country, empire is no more, your suggestion that they stop being upperty and do what the their betters in the UK do is not realistic or useful.
By the way, the DUP have just scuppered a deal. They wanted no border, this was a deal which kept NI inside the CU, and they didn't want that either citing differences between NI and rUK, as if 12.5% corporation tax in NI and the GFA and all that entails aren't differences. Brexit is being driven by the Protestant Taliban which won less than 1% of the vote. Has there ever been a worse government in modern British history?
I do wonder if Lysenko would disagree with your suggestion as it allows a few to dictate to the many, something he accused of England in this UK wide vote.
However you measure it, England is not the few.
Second if it requires all 4 to vote leave then what you are saying is we can be held hostage by the few and that the UK wouldnt have a choice.
Sort of like 37%* of the electorate voting for Brexit, the Tory government deciding leaving the EU would mean leaving the single market and customs union too despite only receiving 29%* of the vote in the 2017 elections, and what the DUP are doing now when it comes to how the Irish border will be implemented?
* Taking into account abstentions.
Perhaps the referendum should have been set up so every part of the UK had to vote leave in order for the UK to leave.
There are after all four geopolitical regions and if some vote to leave but others vote to stay then the first question that immediately arises is about the break-up of the UK.
First you say it's a UK vote when obviously due to numbers it's just England which decides the outcome of the vote (as seen by the immediate constitutional crisis on the 24th which is still running till this day) then secondly you say if he doesn't like the English he should go and live in his beloved EU.
Way to prove his point.
To those people I say: Pack your bags, close the door behind you and good riddance! We don't need fareweather friends.
There's so much to choose from, where do we start.
- We did it to ourselves. But perhaps we do need friends who stick with us while we have some kind of collective national nervous breakdown.
- Are you complaining about his wife and kids? NI is part of the UK.
- Are you complaining about him? He could be British and born in rUK.
- Are you complaining about foreigners? Oh dear.
Yes, I watched B5 and DS9/Voyager alongside each other back in the day.
They were both different visions of the future, I liked them both, and nobody tried to make another series set in their universes which was so out of place it was jarring... until now of course.
I don't even consider myself a hardcore Trekkie, but do you know why hardcore Trekkies hate Discovery? Because until then it had an optimistic vision of the future. Even Seth MacFarlain's effort is better to watch than Discovery.
Star Trek: Discovery could have done well enough if it were called something else and not trying to fit into a universe it's not made for.
And if Tarantino gets to make a ST film then we might as well stick a fork in Star Trek because it's done.
Unless things have changed recently, you have the option to opt out of iCloud on the iPhone. Updates and backups can be done with iTunes.
I really doubt the Play Services binary does nothing if you don't sign in. It will still probably send WiFi and cell tower info to Google without asking permission.
It turned out the free screen plastic was a fix, when you eventually took it off because it started peeling off at the edges, the touch sensitivity went a bit odd during sudden changes of temperature or charging and you turned into a grandad trying to prod at the screen.
The compass spins round more than David Davis and Juncker at an EU negotiating table.
LED buttons tended to stop lighting up, although I've not seen this happen with mine.
Battery lasts about half a day now after a couple of years.
Maybe they've got their white label manufacturer more under control now, but my next one is a Nokia.
Which version of Windows was supposed to be a from-the-ground-up redesign after the whole dev team had been training on "secure coding"?
All of them, I think. Yet oddly the CVEs between different versions are suspiciously similar.
"The Voyager flight team dug up decades-old data and examined the software that was coded in an outdated assembler language, to make sure we could safely test the thrusters."
I expect they had useful comments and documentation too, which will never be outdated. In fact many companies haven't even heard of them yet.