Re: "... we at El Reg never provide positive coverage in exchange for freebies."
I take it you missed Dabbsy's review of the iPhone X.
15447 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
It was the 30th of December, so they've changed their accounting date again.
Dinosaur de-facto monopolies always have something ready to announce should the minnow-sized competition dare to launch a new product which competes with their line up.
Otherwise it'll never see the light of day. I mean, why would it if they're the monopoly?
Britain was fundamental in the development of the Single Market, so the current flailing around in government showing the complete misunderstanding of what it is is rather disappointing.
There is also no amount of trade on Earth with other countries that can replace being shut out of Single Market, that's perhaps why Whitehall is mentally welded to it.
Basically stopping single market access is a stick to be welded if the UK doesn't respect EU citizens' rights. With any rational government at the helm it shouldn't have to be used. So it could very well get used.
And I don't think the fundamentalist wing of the Brexiteers mind too much, they want out of everything ASAP anyway. They just need to engineer something to get punished.
That's the UK, not Tory MPs, some of whom may engineer something to get punished every evening. Allegedly. (See icon.)
She did. The idea is not to mention the suffragettes and to starve the organisations and cebrations of funding so people don't realise they can make a difference.
As she's that much of a one trick pony, when she doesn't want to mention something, she fills the silence with her pet hate, the Internet.
Recommendation not to pay the ransom, recommendations for what seems to be antiviruses and data recovery companies, "cyber-awareness" PowerPoints for management, and a recommendation for NHS trusts to develop their local action plans.
This is the organisation which "hacks back"? I'm not exactly impressed, maybe I'm expecting too much of the NCSC. You know, sort of like what Hutchins did (who was later not warned that he would be arrested in the US).
Can you really claim that just after Spectre and Meltdown rendering cloud pretty pointless as you can't share hosting with anyone else? You can pay more to have the entire server to yourself, but if you do that you might as well stick with your own data centre.
In a few years new CPUs will come out which address Spectre and Meltdown (probably available as an option for a premium cost), but then again GDPR will be up and running and will have hopefully focused minds on privacy and data protection. If it's in your basement it's much more difficult to be accused of losing control of your data.
Without blaming millennials, our society expects to access information fast and in a manner that’s convenient. That behaviour is seen in our customers and in our workers. Whether it’s a self-service portal to change your address, an account with your personal details for ordering from an app, or just the ability to check work emails on the train from your own phone, we’ve changed our definition of “remote access.”
Who has an expectation of checking work e-mail from outside the office? My expectation is that I don't check it, but it seems fewer and fewer jobs will allow you to (not) do that. It's of utmost importance to stay on the hamster wheel.
Nope - Registry keys are much lower level than a config file in Linux. And you don't get such auditing in Linux without a version control system.
In registry nomenclature, a key contains value-data pairs. In everybody else's nomenclature, a configuration file usually contains key-value pairs. How are they not equivalent?
Nope - not private - you can't block root accessing anything on a Linux filesystem.
SELinux.
Almost all OS configuration is in the Registry and all the advantages above apply. Also it's much faster to parse and far more scalable than text files.
[Citation needed]
A configuration file, even on Windows, can be text, binary, whatever the program developer needs.
No, registry keys are almost always at a way more granular level than configuration files in Linux.
No, because a key holds a collection of value-data pairs, similar to a configuration file holding a collection of settings.
But if that happens you just boot to the "last know on good configuration" or a system restore point.
Which was disabled from Windows 8 onwards. You need to set a registry key to enable it again. Difficult if the problem is due to the registry being hosed.
No, they recommend that for data that must or you choose to store as files. There is no recommendation not to use the registry.
So on the one hand we have, "if you want, go ahead and use files", and on the other we have Registry Junk: A Windows Fact of Life and finally the future (UWP) does not use it. Not difficult to work out what MS' advice really is.
Because .Net apps can be multiplatform.
UWP apps are multiplatform but mobile is dead so it's multiplatform with one platform.
You have per key ACLs and auditing, you have atomic transaction commits with rollback and snapshot capability and above all it's a single interface, a single location and a standard format for all configuration data. Windows stopped using crappy solutions like INI files many years ago - Linux has yet to catch up.
The registry was a Windows 3.1 solution to there being no defined hierarchy of directories to hold application settings, so it had to be centralised because otherwise developers would put files anywhere and nothing could stop them (unlike UNIX).
Registry keys are equivalent to files, which can also have ACLs and auditing. Most configuration files are stored in the user's home directory meaning the settings are private to that user without doing anything.
In UNIX if you want to copy a program across from one comouter to another it's easy to install the same program from the repository and copy the configuration file/directory across. Try that in Windows.
Commit and rollback are necessary because it's centralised, and that still isn't good enough as registry corruption and registry cleaners are things in Windows.
If there is a corrupt configuration file in UNIX you just wipe it or restore from backup and carry on with your day. Try the same on a Windows machine with a hosed registry.
Finally the registry is legacy. MS now recommends %APPDATA% is used for desktop software settings and it isn't used in TIFKAM app settings.
to me its you
face facts
wouldn't matter what the hell Microsoft did - in these forums the penguins would be all over it
I use Windows, macOS, and Linux and I don't discriminate, I hate them all equally. Perhaps MS could pull the plug on the slurping. Until then, it's Windows 7 for me.
Jesus christ...the ribbon has been around for 11 years.
The interface hasn't had a radical change since.
By all means bash them for the stuff they do. Not the stuff you didn't like over a decade ago.
If that doesn't show you how really fucking awful the ribbon is, what will? It's not as if commentards actively refuse to learn it, it's there day in, day out. It's just such an atrocious user-hostile design, like TIFKAM. Both, incidentally, pushed by the same person.