Re: mmm, seems theres 1 law for us and another for tory MP's
When I read something which tells me exactly what she did, then I'll know whether it was hacking or not.
15423 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
191 Million US Voter Registration Records Leaked In Mystery Database
So who's worse, Cambridge Analytica or this other shower of bastards?
Roll on the GDPR.
I vaguely recall they were visible on the mobile view, but they were a strange size and disappeared pending a fix of some sort, however I don't think the mobile view has never allowed an icon to be chosen when posting.
Back to the other subject, people clicking on the forums home page is a route to My Posts. At least that's how I do it without bookmarks. But if you make it less discoverable, even fewer people are going to read or post user posts. The thing to do would be to make it more discoverable.
If I hit the forum link at the top, it goes to article topic sections, not the forum as we know it. I have to click User Topics on the right to get to TFAWKI.
You don't really need another path to find article topics at the end of forum topics, they're linked to at the end of every article, so after having read too many IBM/HP stories I can only assume this is to to deter the casual forum viewer before the inevitable chop due to lack of readership, because it's certainly not very discoverable.
Wouldn't it be better to have both types of topic sections listed on one page for max discoverability? Why can't we all just get along in this world?
If you can remember Symbian, BlackBerry, or even the original Windows Phone (shudder) apps, they were useful and paid-for. It's only been like this since the Silly Valley got in on the game with their attitude to people's data.
So when the article says "but the even uglier truth is that such data-sharing practices may be the only way the mobile app economy can sustain itself", the author forgot how things were 10 years ago.
Well Elop went with Windows Phone, tried to get MS to buy the the mobile division but they didn't bite, the mobile division sank due to WP, then the board divised a Plan B which consisted of locking Elop up, releasing Nokia X, and MS finally bit.
So Nokia gets honorable mention for MS technologies sinking a brand, even if Nokia managed to save themselves in the end.
The thing is, to a point, I have to agree with zucks....
The only info that could have been gained from searches of phone numbers and email addresses is your public profile info that YOU posted.
Sorry, explain again why on Earth Facebook should let anyone put in any e-mail address or phone number into the search box to get a reverse lookup? And if you can come up with a credible explanation for that and want bonus points, you can explain why their app slurping people's phone numbers is a good idea (so Facebook may have a phone number for someone who explicitly has not filled in an input box with their phone number on) and why Zuck lets it happen with apparently no bot protection.
The only device I trust to show YouTube* for a U or PG audience is one running Kodi on a big screen. No badly targeted ads (or ads at all), no suggestions leading you down a rabbit hole, search results aren't tailored to previous video views and you can tell if they're relevant or not before playing, and if you like you can apply parental controls to the add-on. If a bunch of volunteers can manage it in their spare time, why can't a billion dollar company?
* or other free-content video flinging websites
The message that a new design language every year (UWP, UWP + Fluent, PWA) and rolling out OS support for them in an agile way is developer hostile has to percolate up first. Who on earth is going to be able to aim for a target moving like that? The only constant is Win32, the only API worth using is Win32, therefore the only one that developers will use is Win32.
Developers might package software up for the Windows Store if they're badgered by MS enough, but that's about it.
Here is a simple question. Why does this subject matter to you?
Why does it matter to me? I guess really it doesn't. I just don't the like continual human tragedies brought about by a complete lack of control over weapons that kill. Ignoring those and arguing that guns make you safer with this going on in the background is utter stupidity brought about by sheer unthinking dogma. The pro-gun lobby have had years of things their way, and what have we learned played out by these massacres day after day? Look at the empirical evidence: free availability of guns just doesn't work. Why doesn't it matter to you? It should.
As for the "racist" jibe. Always the first resort of the low information types who live in lilly white environments.
Nope, read the original AC post. In a post which argues against gun control, there is a recognition that there is a problem with young black males having access to guns. Therefore they are an acceptable price to pay so other people can have some toys to play with, feel safe in areas which in all probability aren't touched by gun crime, and go out and shoot a few animals.
And comparing access to guns to the NHS is rather... obtuse. Like to try again?
The best summary of US gun politics is still the Scott Adams one. Democratic voters uses guns to kill each other, and innocent people. Republican voters use guns to hunt, and to protect themselves against Democratic voters. The great unmentionable in the whole debate simple fact that around 70% of gun crime is young black males mostly killing each other. The other great unmentionable is that young black males from an immigrant background dont kill each other.
So freely available guns are necessary because Republicans need to hunt instead of going to the supermarket and to protect themselves against Democrats who are the enemy because they kill innocent Republicans, and black people are expendable. Nice.
A shame I, as a non-USAn, don't understand the nuanced intricacies of this argument and I am limited to calling you out for a racist with political views which are so warped they mean you hate about half of your own country. I look forward to your "top of the world, ma" moment being live streamed on YouTube before you're brought down by a hail of bullets by Democrat police officers. By the law of averages there should be another one due in about a couple of days if you feel up for it.
Shame we never got an ibmPad (bottom right)...
Zuckerberg did tell the newswire that Facebook is “still nailing down details on this, but it should directionally be, in spirit, the whole thing”. Whatever that means
It means he'll get caught out several times breaking the letter of the law, and each time he'll say "oops, sorry, that was a mistake, we'll fix that real soon now". Eventually, over several years and fines, he'll get dragged kicking and screaming to GDPR compliance but it means he'll be able to slurp for a good while yet.
The low score is due to the limited amount of things you can repair and the difficulty involved in repairing them is high. Apple chose to design it that way. Not too difficult to understand I would have thought.
My nephew got a iPad glass replacement by a “professional” repair company.. the glass shifts around (because they didn’t use enough glue) and the audio port no longer works. You get what you pay for. With Apple you get your device back in mint condition.
Because often the repair involves putting the motherboard in a completely new outer shell which is extremely difficult to get hold of unless you're Apple and has to be glued together. Hence it is not repairable.
Seems Apple have no idea what to do with an iMac/MacBook apart from to turn it into another iDevice. So far, that means jettisoning features and bashing square pegs into round holes. XServe gone, servers gone, routers gone, time capsule gone, displays gone, crapper UI, server management about to go.
What used to be an ecosystem will probably stagger on until XCode can be made to run on tablets.
I asked whether I would have to get rid of my British passport, to which they answered "no", much to my surprise. I now have both nationalities (but only a British passport, and a Dutch ID card.
In your case you always had both British and Dutch nationalities due to your parents and all you were doing was having your Dutch nationality officially recognised.
Unlike British citizens (only one nationality at birth) who moved to the The Netherlands who will soon have to make a tough choice.
In most EU countries, for starters, carrying ID (in the form of an ID card if you're a resident, or valid passport if you're a foreigner) is mandatory.
Not quite true, in 19 out of 33 countries they are optional or don't exist. The UK is just crap when it comes to proving people's identity and tracing someone's history, so much so that naturalised Windrush children who came to the UK when they were five or so and are now in their 60s are now getting caught up in yet another Home Office witch-hunt.
Well the current Home Office headline in The Guardian is that a father is being deported by the Home Office over an accounting error, something which HMRC didn't fine him for, and something nasty will happen to his autistic daughter as most people don't know what autism is in Pakistan.
That is "taking control of our borders".
What did John Reid say over a decade ago... "the Home Office is not fit for purpose".
No, no it's not. Every new language that appears is inspired by or built on the previous languages that came before it, if only for developer familiarity which reduces learning time and helps speed up development time.
If you think otherwise, you might as well bin Java in its entirity because half of it is copied from C and C++ (trollface: and the other half is done wrong).
However there are limits. You can't argue that Java's API was the sole reason for Android's success because Java ME got absolutely nowhere.