Hottest newcomer should have been...
Christina Hendricks (Joan from Mad Men).
She's a good 15 years my senior, but oh sweet baby jeebus...
617 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
Take them to small claims court. Either they'll not bother to show up and the default judgement will be in your favour, or they will and you can (at least in the US) claim for punitive damages and legal costs. It might cost you some time and money, but it's better than the "We offer you a $10 gift voucher for Sony products, without admitting culpability or liability, or any wrongdoing." out-of-court settlement this class action lawyer will accept, making himself a tidy couple of million dollars in the process.
5000 small suits sends a *much* bigger message, and hurts Sony more, than one easily dismissable case.
No packaging cost, no manufacturing of physical media, and you want to charge *more*than I would pay for a single Blockbuster rental, or the equivalent of *two* rentals per month (with no limit on when you watch them) from LOVEFiLM?
This will go precisely the same way as the music download service they launched, and the media companies will chalk it down to pirates and cheap consumers again instead of their own non-competitive business model.
DOOMED. TO. [Icon]
I've deployed VLC across three schools that I've worked for to replace bundled DVD / media players, and I've received not one complaint. It loads fast, plays everything you throw at it, and is easy enough for the less IT literate teachers (typically the ICT teachers) to use.
MPC may be great, but saying that VLC isn't will win you no friends.
I wrote to Lorely Burt, my local Lib Dem MP, regarding the portions of the DEB which were effectively only for propping up the artificial scarcity model of the major record labels. She sent back a letter detailing the important points of the proposed Act which made it worthwhile, but ultimately agreed with my points and said that she would follow the party line and vote against it.
She didn't even turn up.
It won't result in tedious checks, it'll result in a lack of confidence in the checks and data held by government.
When peole refuse to be a part of the broken system (investing in safety deposit boxes for cash instead of bank accounts for electronic money etc) the system will change, because those who monetise it will become bankrupt or face significant changes.
Copyright, since 1710 when the first UK law regarding it was approved, has always been about the rights of the consumer. "Copy" "right" i.e. the rights of the consumer for the copy of the work whiich thety own. It's only recently that big media has forced a model of recycling old media and major political lobbying into the mix to turn the situation on its head, and turn copyright law into mandated artificial scarcity and outright abuse of all entertainment media.
Still, we're off-topic.
So, the internet makes old media obsolete? Wow. Welcome to the dotcom bubble.
Allow me to don my berret and poloneck sweater, and sip a lightly sweetened double-skinny-upside-down-iced-cafemachilatechino with nutmeg sprinkles.
I'm sorry, but this "revelation" was insightful a decade ago. It's just that News Corp. and Big Media have billions of dollars stockpiled, and has been throwing it all at lawyers and congresscritters to keep themselves afloat. Plus, sheeple will buy anything you put honey glazing on, or drape scantily-clad women over.
Maybe we'll hear about that in the next installment though, eh?
... I started watching Fringe last night. Managed about 20 minutes of an episode from an online "cache" and decided it was worth a look. £20 later and I own the first series! Here's hoping there's some references to atom-smashing and other wonderful sciency gubbins to explain the 6th-sense style words in the intro.
(Psst... Hey, big media. Yeah, I saw 20 minutes of your show from an unlicensed source AND THEN BOUGHT THE WHOLE FIRST SEASON. Think about it...)
Unfortunately, Sony, you'd be disabling an advertised feature after an item has been purchased, and that's a big legal no-no! Expect to be sued by nerds, gamers, educational insititions, and the US military (who have used clustered PS3s in supercomputer scenarios).
For those US folks interested in joining a class-action lawsuit over this, consider visiting the following link: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1598432&cid=31653602
Anybody want to start a similar thing up for the UK?
Ofcom: "Please be more honest with customers when telling them about broadband speeds."
ISPs: "No."
Ofcom: "... Ok then."
I like the way Europe did it with Microsoft over the browser integration: Fine them an exhorbitant amount PER DAY for not rectifying issues. £100k should do it. Don't give me that rubbish about smaller ISPs not being able to pay: They have smaller offices and distributed staffl; An email to all staff saying "Tell them that actual speed will degrade with distance from the exchange, amongst other factors, and that often this isn't the ISPs fault." Then they don't have to pay anything!
Why must big companies make things so difficult...
On Slashdot, there is a popular phrase which is applicable here.
*WHOOSH!*
The Pirate Party *WILL NEVER* be a major political party. They *WILL NEVER* run the country. Not one of them thinks that they will, and in that sence they're very much like UKIP, Green, and the BNP; They each have a group of voters who they represent, who want to *INFLUENCE* legislation in which they, and their electorate, are interested.
The party needed a manifesto because without it they would just be aimless. With a set of published ideals nobody can say they're just a bunch of "freetards" who want music for bugger all money or effort.
In short, well done on completely missing the point of The Pirate Party. But hey, don't let logic stand in the way of a good rant! After all, that's what the Daily Mail^W^WThe Register is good for.
By the way, the icon isn't for my post.
"Berk" is an abbreviation of the phrase "Berkeley Hunt" which is cockney rhyming slang for... Well... I'm sure you can guess.
By the way, fair enough that you believe the term "female" to be daft PC twaddle, but unfortunately that's the world we now endure. Say something out of place, and someone will sue for emotional duress.
FWIW, I don't even let my g/f call a load of washing "coloured" anymore. I insist on "ethnically diverse" loads.
Firefox is not totally fucked (since actually running 9.10 since november last, using firefox exclusively).
I have never used Seamonkey, so I guess you can have that one.
See first point.
The MP3 codec is proprietary code, and more than likely cannot be included with Ubuntu by default. One quick download later and you're all up and running, if it doesn't do it out of the box.
I don't see Flash advertisments. Images yes, text yes, Flash NO. Flashblock is your friend. I've used iPlayer to watch movies (In The Loop most recently: 1hr40m) without issue, after a little tinkering (all detailed on the Ubuntu forums).
As for updates... Wow. God forbid, you've never experienced a power cut while installing a service pack. Or downloaded an AV update which downloaded several core DLLs. Drive-by virus installation? I reboot Ubuntu for kernel updates ONLY.
So, in short, by my experience you're wrong.
In the UK you'll be put on the sex offender's register for sending pictures of yourself to your partner if you're under 18. Describing an act could even be seen as intent. Oh, and your partner would be on there too for posession of indecent images of a minor.
We're just as backward as any middle-eastern territory... We just don't chop pieces off the perpetrators.
Reasons idiots will press this button, resulting in massive increases in wasted investigation time and tax payer money:
- They said I look pretty
- They have shifty eyes / eyes too close together
- Their glasses are a little rapey
- They are wearing a trench coat
- There is a picture of them on a beach with children present
- I have a chip on my shoulder
- My friend said so
- I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE FUNNY
How about schooling kids about using the internet responsibly and safely, and keeping parents informed about ways to interact with their children regarding this technology?
As always, this is a problem solved by EDUCATION, NOT LEGISLATION.
A US citizen which runs a US website hosted within the US is charged with breaches of Australian law because Australian citizens have chosen to download information from that website? The bits only ENTERED Australia because an Australian citizen requested that them!
There's something wrong with all of this.
Novelty value of new toy means kids spend more time with it than with older toys.
Kids who are not actively monitored and guided will spend more time playing games than working.
Parents should ensure children do their homework before playing games, study learns.
Seriously... Worst "science" ever.