'cos
...if everyone is online then they can have a better look at what everyone is up to.
3439 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
If a company the size of Lloyds has 4,500 IT people it can just drop then I'd say there are serious issues as to how the company is run. I mean, no matter how many branches they have the software/kit should be the same and hence scalable as they're all offering the same product suite. I thought IB's could be heavy on IT staff at times but to be able to shift 4,500 IT people and keep functioning is something truly special. That is the sign of one really badly run company.
"Our goal is to help prevent traffic accidents, free up people’s time and reduce carbon emissions by fundamentally changing car use,"
What's the World coming to when people feel there is time needed to be freed up when they're behind the wheel? Need the time to update your Facebook profile, touch up makeup, read paper etc etc? How about these people that feel this sort of thing is necessary use public transport and stay the f*ck off of the roads.
"During a data migration, the flags that were used to indicate that a listing was historical were deleted, causing the addresses to be considered current. SORBS is in the process of restoring the flags. The historical entries are used to help programs rate the likelihood that a given IP address is malicious."
Ooo, competent! Just makes me want to use their services.
Sounds like I should be off to buy some UK energy provider shares then - can't see any downside if Ofgem allow open season on the customer.
Whatever happened to taking part of your profits and reinvesting it for future growth? From what I can see they've taken 100% of their profits and handed them out to executives and shareholders and now want the end consumer to stump up some more for the investment they themselves should have been doing. Wankers.
If I were a SocGen shareholder I'd be seriously pissed off with a financial firm that could allow 50bn of exposure in derivatives to go "unnoticed" let alone run their entire risk architecture off of Excel (which I don't believe from having worked in several banks). Also they'd have to have been posting massive amounts of margin i.e. cash against these positions and it's not like you don't notice money going out the door. "Last month our posted margin was Xbn, this month it's 2Xbn. Not to worry" - yeah, right. If it looks like bullshit and smells like bullshit then chances are it is. This is just a way of protecting people further up the chain.
Indeed, aren't ship to ship encounters normally taken care of by some form of aircraft providing extended radar range? I'd have thought that once you're in ship to ship detection range you're fucked hence they don't need the surface level stuff. Plus they're normally operating in a battle group.
I believe the whole point of the contactless bank card (they're introducing them in Oz for amounts less than $100) is that the losses from fraud are then covered by the nice customer whose money has be purloined rather than being a dreadful inconvenience for the banks/card providers. Of course it's advertised as "fast and easy" for the customer - a bit like a mugging.
It is interesting to see how the US behaves as it's finances turn to shit and it watches the rise of China to financial superpower status as almost a spectator. Not saying they're going to be second fiddle or a busted flush but they're like the junior school bully that's now moved to secondary school and found that they are no longer that much bigger and tougher than everyone else. They behaviour seems reflective of that - lashing out at friends and making a grab for any power they can.
"Employers can be held responsible for third party harassment, eg of frontline staff by customers"
So if I work in a call centre and someone phones up and gives me a serve of what a useless c*nt I am then that's my employer's fault?
I do see a way to make BT pay for all its woeful inadequacies here.
"Everywhere else in the world you are not allowed to discriminate on salary. Specifically selecting higher pay bracket employees for a cull while leaving lower paid with same job desc is verbotten."
Dude, you are seriously dreaming. Discrimination goes on and always will, you just have to be smart about the reason given. As for "everywhere else in the World" try coming to Australia and claiming workers rights - you'd be unemployed and on a hiding to nothing especially if you work for the State Government.
On the TV just last night not only did he make the 100% effective claim (although he did caveat it that it's 100% effective at blocking a url you give it, not the general material) but he also claimed that the filtering technology has absolutely no noticeable effect on the network speed. If he reckons he can filter 1Gb/s connections upstream with no noticeable bottleneck I think someone should "tell him he's dreamin"
Regarding justifications - for $43bn you could get a lot more surgeons and have omnipresent surgery rather than telepresence surgery.
Yep, it is on the wrong side of the planet - whether you're talking left to right or top to bottom. It's an 8 hour flight from Brisbane to those big economies and that's the northernmost place (i.e. closest) you could get away with describing as a city. With regards it also getting quite cold - with the exception of Tasmania those "cold" places such as Adelaide and Melbourne also hit 40 in summer.
Afraid the "arse-end of nowhere" descriptor has no chance of dying anytime soon and that's how other people who live here also describe it.
For those that got in early it's like buying a call option with no expiry - it won't have cost them that much compared to what future investors may need to pay for a similar stake and it could either make them very rich or expire worthless. For venture capitalists you can bet there's big tax breaks on the sunken funds.
Yep, it's the same old shit and always happens with illiquid assets - your superannuation/pension fund will be doing the same thing. Some assets get an independent valuation based on cashflows/profits and/or similar sales of like assets (direct property such as office blocks or shopping malls) and shit like this gets valued by the last buy-in.
So if some prick buys 1% of Facebook for $1bn then they say it's worth $100bn. It's utter shit, but that's what happens.
If you're a major big business with 10,000+ PCs then you may not have to spend $50 per seat to upgrade as it's probably going to be taken care of in your volume license - after all, MS would like you to upgrade. The majority of the operating hardware will likely be fine with Windows 7 given that Core 2 Duo has been out since 2006 and hardware generally has a write-down period of around 3 years although renewal is likely longer. This should mean you are unlikely to find much predecessor kit about, but even then I have run Windows 7 on a 3GHz P4 just fine - it can automatically strip out a lot of the flash graphics to make itself more performant.
What it brings in the functional aspect is a 64-bit operating system which is far nicer and, in my opinion, easier to use than XP. It's also more secure. I have both on 2 different machines and XP just sucks after a period of using 7. Upgrading to Windows 7 is a great opportunity for companies to make the move to 64-bit and is exactly what I am witnessing with my current employer.
I'd go easy on the whole "staff need to be trained". IT people yes, but general staff should be able to use the OS. Logon, find app, do shit. It has a start menu, a programs section, pinned items and an ability to search for an application. All but one of those are in XP. You'd have to be a bit thick to not be able to make the switch as an end-user as the same old apps will be there.
Proprietary software can likely be installed in compatibility mode or you could just run up a XP VM in order to use it - don't hamstring an entire enterprise for the apps of the few. Most businesses just use the same old apps (mail, internet, office) with a few specialties thrown in, very few of which will be an issue. Such large businesses will likely have VM infrastructure and/or Citrix remote access infrastructure - either of which can be used for legacy apps.
The main demand paths for Windows 7 use will be (in no particular order):
1. The end of MS support - 2014 is a long way off but best of luck with the last-man-standing approach
2. The rising costs of XP support - there will likely be 3rd party software providers who don't want to support XP just like there will be ones who don't want to re-write/engineer for 7. Persuading them will come at a cost.
3. The need for 64-bit computing - XP-64 driver support is awful.
4. Software being 7-only
You mention 2 of the above and I certainly wouldn't underestimate the power of any of the above for pushing even large corporates to using 7 over XP. Using an OS that's 2 versions behind and around 9 years old may be seen as an unsustainable/unacceptable operational risk.
IMHO, it's becoming a tougher proposition to justify remaining on XP than moving to 7.
I do love to see the commentards on forums down-vote people with obviously more relevant knowledge than themselves for seemingly no other reason than they don't like what's being said.
Personally I thought your post quite balanced, informative and reasonable but then again, I'm not going to attribute knowledge to myself that I know I clearly do not possess.
However, the Warner move removes one plank in a common freetard defence..."I am only doing this because it is not available and I must see this now".
But keeps intact the other defence of "how about letting us have it for a reasonable price?" as they want 35 quid for a poxy season pass. Cheeky pricks.
"Military experience has no relevance to political decisions."
Yep, because the politicians have been bankrolling our guys so well in recent years. No shortage of kit under the previous Government that was only remedied through public outrage at articles in the media about soldiers not even having body armour on tour in the middle east.
Politicians should consult our military, that of our allies (for potential cost sharing) and maybe some independent advisers (military strategists etc not twats like Mandelson) then set objectives of what needs to be achieved and keep the f*ck out. It's pretty much how most departments should be run. Consult those that do the job, get some independent advice and put together the targets then leave them to it given most things pollies touch turn to shit.
Like it or loathe it, I think the Linux universe would do well to recognise what Shuttleworth has done for them by helping to make it that much more straightforward to get a distro installed on the system in the first place and more usable once it's there.
I remember the old Red Hat installs before I used Ubuntu - what an absolute palaver. In my mind it is Ubuntu that has made Linux systems that much more of a proposition for the end-user than any other single entity. It's all well and good for Red Hat and the like to submit fixes etc but if the interface has poor usability then there's little point.
<quote>
Linus has chosen the course of action that will provide him and his family the freedom to pursue whatever he desires without the oppressive state leering over his shoulder and providing its "expert guidance and advice"
</quote>
Yeah, but won't he just be paying for the privilege? Seen the finances recently? Rather than being an "oppressive state" it is an "oppressive uber-capitalist free-for-all" where corporates take all and shit on the little man. You pays your money, you makes your choice.