Re: RE: Master / slave
I recall some version control systems having the concept of trunk and branch.
3439 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
Hey hey hey, don't forget the 2010s too. My graphics card sh*t itself and the only thing anyone would replace it with was the exact same model sh*tty card that had the issue in the first place. Wouldn't even replace it with a later model card that was clearly compatible. For this reason it's stuck on High Sierra.
The problem I have is that I keep having to move my chosen distro as this infectious mindset pervades the industry. The old "for the common good" rationale. As stated by others, they don't know what I'm doing with my machine and why I've chosen not to do something.
What I found more concerning was this
During a global pandemic, Australians can't access state health departments on Facebook.
I can see that they posted there (on Facebook) for reasons of convenience but it shouldn't be an alien concept to them that they were always playing with someone else's toys in a sandpit/cesspit they didn't own or control. Not really a great way of disseminating vital information. Also a bit of a strawman given health departments all have their own official sites.
I'm no fan of Facebook and think anyone who gets their information from their gets what they deserve. You always pay a price for convenience.
Patrick from Serve The Home covered this move by Synology recently. His take was that it is not unusual in the enterprise sector for this to occur as the likely buyer of this kit wants one neck to wring if there's a problem rather than a bun fight between storage and device manufacturers over who's to blame.
The other point he added was that it would be advisable for them to add one more manufacturer to the list of compatible drives else you can get supply chain issues for drives especially if there's another Thai flooding event.
He did also note that this move likely doubles their revenue from the sale of one of these devices when considering filling it with the larger drive size.
and for that 300 seat subscriber the price hike is designed to be painful (and profitable) without being so painful they disappear elsewhere. You'd hope they'd have done the calculations to work out what they could and couldn't charge based on the data they have access to regarding how captive you are - number of seats, number of active seats, frequency of use, data volumes etc. If you're priced out and leave my guess is that they've calculated you're not the sort of customer they want.
including the so called "digital natives" - who are just raised to be like Orwell's sheep.
One of the funniest and yet most inaccurate things I've ever read was any article proclaiming millennials to be tech-savvy. Wasting your life on the socials is not "tech-savvy".
No, I don't. Social media companies, like other companies, are private entities. They should have the ability, should they choose to use it, to decide how they want their system used.
So if Facebook, for example, decided to only one side of any story/news item so as to direct the narrative you're ok with that? Can't have it both ways.
So their success should render them unable to operate their platform as they see fit?
That's generally how the law works with regards monopolies. Microsoft wanted to operate their platform as they saw fit (EEE) but the EU decided that, no, you cannot do that.
It's all about the money money money...
Plenty of places I know of used to run a single production RHEL system surrounded by a myriad of compatible CentOS ones. Not sure if that ruse still works these days, but it would be a good reason to get rid of CentOS - you want stable? $$$$$
For me, the move to a subscription from self-hosted signals the turning point for the decline of a company. With a lack of any compelling reason to continue to buy into upgrades they need to move to subscription + cloud to get income. Far from Adobe's move being an indicator of success, I believe it signals the lack of any meaningful competitor in their market. Their offerings have given no reason to update over the years so now they have to resort to extortion.
There's a lot to be said for being able to control what version you're on rather than having someone continually "upgrade" you no matter what.
I thought this was about big companies scraping entire stories and presenting them on their own sites with an attribution but it reads like this is just about when I click on the news filter what comes up. I don't see why Google should need to fulfill all of those requirements when just presenting a story link and extract. As for paying the likes of the Murdoch press for a link to a story, what the fuck?
You’re not their target market. Tinkerers need not apply. These devices are targeted at people that buy what they need first up and “admire the design” as it sits on display. Pros using Apple machines spend big dollars on high end kit and write it off against tax. Their boxes have replaceable components.
Others like myself will run hackintoshes until they go all in with their own silicon. However we take the occasional pain for that choice.
My 2010 2.93GHz i7 seems to be going just fine. Sure it’s now relegated to just being the “family” computer as it met the barrier of to low a graphics card for post High Sierra macOS, but for modern versions where thunderbolt and USB allow you to effectively upgrade the graphics card it’s not so much of a problem.
master
with main
across its services
If this is the reaction from *white* people asking to move away from problematic wording, can you imagine what would happen if people of color spoke up, though?
Sorry, I don't follow your straw-man construct - probably due to the visibility issues caused by the large plume of smoke as it burns to the ground. I think the point the OP you respond to is making is colour agnostic. They are more offended by the ignorance shown. That doesn't have to come with any colour attached and is more a sign of the times where any little twat gets offended on someone else's behalf.
Perhaps we should also get started on binary whilst we're at it - those 1's and 0's are very male-female centric and not entirely inclusive for those that perhaps don't identify as being strictly one or t'other.