Either...
...these are the extremely low hanging fruit - the puppets at the end of the strings - or these people take absolutely no precautions with regards their own security whilst preaching to others.
3439 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
Although they may not be a master of all fields I would happily wager that most physicists at CERN have a greater grasp of mathematics, statistics, modelling, time-series analysis etc than most of the climate science monkeys out there whose experiments and modelling outputs cannot be reproduced. Mainly because that reproducibility is at the core of what they do.
"Whether or not AGW is responsible for anything, if we decide that warming is happening, we need to tackle it, whether or not it is man made."
Horseshit, with all due respect. Try to fight Mother Nature and you are doomed to failure. A bloody expensive one involving massive wealth transfer from the poor at that. This really comes back to mankind thinking they are the be all and end all. Self-preservation is always key, but if you're doomed as a species then you're doomed.
We certainly do not have to tackle that which we cannot change. What are you going to do if it turns out volcanic eruptions are the problem? Fill all fault-lines with ready-mix?
For quite some time now the police have seen themselves as exempt from the rules that apply to the rest of us. Whether it comes to accepting gifts whilst in office, powering through red lights and "accidentally" killing an innocent member of the public, hassling photographers, abusing anti-terrorism powers, or misidentifying and blowing the brains out of an electrician on the tube. Nobody is ever guilty of anything. That in itself is simply bullshit.
If the Government ever want anyone to ever have any respect for the police ever again then law-breaking and corruption need to be smashed within the forces. Kind of like a "bringing the game into disrepute" charge in sport. You cannot enforce the law whilst acting like you are above it. It does not work. A bit like the concept of investigating yourself for corruption. Whilst they're at it they can get some oversight of their own shenanigans.
"In response to Direct Line's survey, the Home Office issued the following statement: "It is the crime that impacts negatively upon communities. Crime maps will allow residents to hold their local police to account for the level of crime and antisocial behaviour in their neighbourhood, pushing police to tackle crime which really affects the local community.""
And given the local plod rarely give a fuck, what's my recourse? Can I sack them? No? Not much going to change then. Surely you bring this in after the concept of electable police chiefs?
Some people are saying a EAW removes the need for an extradition order and that other citizens have been booted overseas on a whim, yet JA is fighting an extradition order in the High Court. So which is it, can someone clear this up? Or is it the case that it's not opposable unless you can afford to take it straight to the High Court?
Doesn't this rely on
1. A very stable, reliable internet connection.
2. No power interruptions.
otherwise emails get lost in the ether or kicked back to the sender? Running your own server might be great but most ISPs don't allow it on anything but a business connection and getting too many server cannot be reached messages might put off senders.
Or are you doing things differently?
Is one of the main problems that we import our energy (coal, gas and French electricity) and that the vast majority of our exports are to the EU/US who collectively aren't buying anything? Germany is no doubt doing OK because they export to China - heavy industrials and luxury cars that don't break down.
If we had more modern nuclear power we might adjust the balance of the energy issue, but when your trading partners aren't buying you're not exporting. Nothing the Government can do about that.
Totally agree.
1. This is just Socialist wealth redistribution whereby the middle classes just get fucked over.
2. The pass-through will never be 0.7%, this is just a bullshit marketing ploy.
3. It will not change a thing. Large emitters are not being suitably punished or are getting a free pass and the general public be damned. We do not waste power as a family (use way less than the average household) but we're going to get fucked over by this.
4. Watch out for the tax tweaking regarding raising the tax free rate. That money will be coming back down the line.
5. There is a floor on the market price when it freely trades so you can tell where that's headed. Haven't seen whether the market is open to speculation or not either.
6. It is being brought in very cynically. People believe it's fantastic that the tax free allowance is being lifted. This is not a altruistic endeavour for the Government it is to make it as hard as possible to repeal the tax.
7. Talk of clean power without inclusion of modern nuclear (MSR etc) is just crap. If it is sustainability you desire then let the shite that is solar (never recoup the energy cost of production) and wind (just crap full stop) stand on their own feet without subsidising them from my power bill.
8. Could this be the trigger that gives Australia its own little recession? Nobody else is bothering with this shit - read a piece today stating that China has 800 steel mills and Australia has (had) 2. They must be laughing their arses off.
Can I just take this opportunity to ask "what is the point of bitcoin?"
It it's anonymity that surely that will all be lost once regulation comes along. Without regulation the legality is questionable which then raises questions of genuine value. It also opens up the potential for systemic abuse and market manipulation. I think I'll stick with the real stuff.
Given the nature of some of these offences - hacking the phones of a dead schoolgirl and hampering the investigation (your new cellmates will truly love you) as well as targeting the relatives of dead servicemen - I can only describe the orchestrator of this (someone had to know about so much going on) as an utter c#nt. Given who hasn't lost their job it doesn't take much guessing in my opinion.
I like the fact that the original cover up, sorry investigation, found there were limited instances Of wrong doing and they'd "got their man". Now after much reporting in the Guardian and other press it turns out it was rampant and dodgey plod, qu'elle surprise, were involved.
Any police involved in this need jailing over it, no fucking around as an example must be set. If there's the slightest whiff that the original investigation was compromised due to arse covering then senior heads need to roll. In my book there is very little that is worse for society than corruption in the corridors of power. Dodgey plod makes my f'cking blood boil due to the shear arrogance of the abuse of power.
Point still stands. You cannot take someone to court saying that they "infringed something" without stating what that something is and how they infringed it. That's kind of a basic premise of an "allegation". This sounds more like that old "you've been caught downloading music illegally so pay £500 and we'll forget about it" ruse. Except the numbers are much larger.
"The research also reveals interesting insights into the kinds of services that matter to Australians – and it’s not all good news for service providers. We love the kinds of things the Internet lets us do, but when it comes to the services the industry loves, such as Internet TV offerings, the enthusiasm hasn’t caught on yet."
The internet came late to Australia in terms of usage in other countries. Australia doesn't have its own Amazon branch and has to buy from the US. Relevance? Amazon is credited widely with making the internet shopping sector broadly acceptable to the general public - reputable company, right of reply/returns etc (at least when it first came onshore). It built confidence in the sector and made it mainstream acceptable. Having emigrated to Australia, the first thing I noticed was a lack of internet shopping. Up until 2010, shops that were tech or tech in part like Harvey Norman or department majors like David Jones and Myers had zero internet shopping opportunities. All these luddites would actually offer was an swf or pdf of the catalogue they ramned through your front door. Utter tech cretins. They still don't offer the ability to compare product prices as most hide the manufacture model and only list their internal code so that you do not know whether you'd be getting a good deal on this year's model or a shit deal on last year's.
Why talk about this? It's because it gives a background to the mentality of businesses in Australia and their embrace of modern technology. Last time I tried, windows media centre could not get a tv schedule over the air or download one without a subscription because the TV channels view the schedule as IP - honestly, I kid you not! These same companies have only recently offered catchup services. There is no aggregator that I know of just per channel catchup services. It is no wonder that nobody is interested in such services - they are shite and incovenient. If you ever wanted to see the music/film industry's business model dying on its arse then look no further.
This is about the only smart thing I've seen regarding transport in Australia, or at least the part I live in. When you pay your annual vehicle registration you also pay your compulsory third party insurance. Same rate for everyone. If you then go on to fully comprehensive that's your choice and you shop around for it.
Possibly a bad example.
"So you add a rule to your orchestration system that says, this system does not slow down. And then you work through the conflicts that decision throws up, ticking boxes as appropriate."
and then when you find out how much that'll cost you say "fuck it, they're only complaining anyhow, let them wait and make the number a premium one whilst we're at it".
600? Really? That is just utter shite. It's almost as if netbook manufacturers are trying to die a death by a thousand cuts with some of the crap they release. If Intel or MS are hamstringing you then use ARM or AMD and/or Linux. I can no longer see average Joe who can't install an OS getting one of these as they'll invariably want a tablet, hence Linux should no longer be the issue it once was. Put a sticker on it that says "Would have Windows 7 and Intel inside but they said no" if need be.
Be interesting to see the ramifications for those using Amazon's services which have backup in multiple zones. For instance what is controlled by elements in the US and how does data move around their networks? If it touches their US datacentres in any way there's the possibility of a quick slurp. I seem to remember an article about a European bank (Paribas maybe?) using Amazon's services (I think) for performing their risk calculations. You wouldn't touch them with a shitty stick after this statement.
In fact just a very small need for it - air defence of the UK. The rest can be subsumed into the Army and Navy as required. That way those that need air support of whatever kind are ultimately in control of their own destiny and not left swinging in the wind when some Whitehall Biggles decides to piss the budget up the wall on kit that cannot be effectively used whilst important needs go unfulfilled.
As for the defence industry, the minister should tell the lot of them to fuck off and get a banking license if they're after a persistent bailout.
It's the average power consumption of 500W - that is truly monstrous. Kind of like regularly boiling the kettle whilst watching a normal TV. The picture will undoubtedly be beautiful but in these days of sky-rocketing power bills this is the major disadvantage of plasma over LED.
It's highly feasible to hang on a stud wall, probably the easiest place to hang it. Hanging mechanisms you can buy from suitable outlets (at least where I am) are rated to 100kg and come with 4" coach bolts (for want of the correct name) with deep thread. You just locate the centre of the stud, pre-drill a hole to prevent the stud being split by the bolt and then ratchet them in. It's a piece of piss. No worries about the thing falling off - you couldn't pull one of these bolts out if you tried and the main stress on them would, I'd guess, be a shearing stress perpendicular to the shaft of the bolt. The plate that hangs on the wall also has a multitude of mounting holes so there's never a worry getting it in the right spot and finding studs to hang it on. I checked with the father-in-law (who's a builder) and he said there's no worries hanging something like that using the bracket I had.
An example bracket is here...
http://www.selbyacoustics.com.au/storefrontprofiles/DeluxeSFItemDetail.aspx?sid=1&sfid=74520&c=84142&i=248336987
Now I've heard a few stories about ones mount on brick suddenly appearing face down on the floor and would certainly pay to have one fitted on that.
In perfect conditions a phone camera may look like it comes close but full size photos in anything but and the difference becomes obvious. You cannot cheat the laws of physics and the pinhole lens and microscopic sensor are the limiting factor unless you want a phone as thick as a camera etc.
I'd have thought the main problem with the validity of a fax when a signature is necessary is that you have no proof that it wasn't just copied onto the document. Without sight of the original you just do not have that ability hence I'd consider faxes where signatures are required as a pretty insecure and shitty way of doing things.