Re: What evidence do you have?
Surely nothing "of itself" will stop terror attacks? Kind of a hollow burned out straw-man.
3439 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
@d3vy: From memory, depending on how hard you push the boundaries, typical tax yield from contract income (going back a few years) is 15-35% with 35% being damn safe (i.e. you get 1 - tax yield in your pocket). Not 40% by any means. Whether it affects your personal income tax or not is irrelevant as we are comparing the spend of pre-taxation money versus post taxation money i.e. £1 vs down to £(1-0.35). The money you'd have to spend personally (rather than corporately) to get the ticket is money taken out of the company remember, and that gets taken out after personal tax is paid as well as corporation tax.
Still, I consider the perks of pre-tax travel to be minor compared to redundancy, pension provision, holidays etc etc. If permies think contractors have it so damned easy and it's such a life of coke, hookers, and unicorn tears then perhaps they should STFU and try it.
I think this bit
Most contractors were likely to be caught by a 'supervision, direction or control' test, according to the feedback.
Catches just about everyone doing anything. I provide direction and supervision of tradies working on my property but I'm pretty sure they're not my employees. Engaged by me for a project, yes, but not employed as such.
I used to have a WD green drive. The 'green' controller part shat itself just after 12 months or so of ownership. When you tried accessing the data it used to spin up, and then down, then up, and then down. Took several days to get data off that hadn't been duplicated - online isn't a backup after all. I have never bought one of their 3.5s ever again. HGST only thanks. Never had a problem with their portable 1TB or 2TB external units on the other hand.
The imposition of restrictions on the transfer of such data would have potentially considerable adverse effects on EU-US commerce and could affect US companies significantly.
Sorry Judge, that problem is not yours to consider or worry about. Is what they are doing within the law or not, that is and should be your only concern. Another fucking lap-dog.
if you're on a 2 week road trip, you won't want to occasionally check with your house and verify everything is good? maybe look at your security cameras, verify the temp/humidity is in range, etc?
Same way I access my computers from outside - VPN back into your own network. It can be done by phone, tablet, or PC. Then you use the App, web page or whatever control mechanism as if you are on your home computer. That particular access problem was solved a long time ago.
@DAnny 14: +1 for the F18s, the fact they should have been nuclear powered, and fitted with catapults so we didn't need the shithouse version of the F35 if we eventually went that way. One of those carriers full of F18s would be good enough. I'd even go as far as to say we could have bought French carrier fighters or Russian ones but there's no US pork in those deals.
"No. Not on the table right now. " TFTFY.
Wait until the Yanks get involved and see where negotiations go, because they will be getting involved like it or not. I doubt there'll be much punishment and more likely an agreement that the UK was always a "special case" as it was never really "in" what with all its concessions, hence no need to disincentivise other countries who have the issue of the common currency to get past and whom are a different kettle of fish entirely. When it comes down to it this will be a tripartite deal between UK, Germany, and the US.
I can think of one reason - because it'll be a pain in the arse to support. VB6 was always a bit of a c*nt to deploy and I'm pretty sure that nowadays nobody wants to drag their CV that far backwards to take on a support contract unless it is at exorbitant prices. So few people are able to support it (plenty think they can code VB, less know of its myriad of shitty bits) and less would want to go back to doing it. Quite aptly for the Liberals this would then be the 1% of the 1%.
Oh how I wish you were right. But Parliament has already made UK citizenship (and hence EU citizenship as well) revocable at the whim of the civil service. Source? I was reading my UK citizenship papers (not quite there yet) a few weeks ago.
That's for someone becoming one. If your family has a long history of being British and you were born in Britain to British parents (non-naturalised) then I think there's fuck all chance of that being revoked. Those laws apply to people that come in, get citizenship, then commit crimes etc. IANAL.
@45RPM and any others of the same mindset: If you don't want to change anything because you are not happy with the margin of victory then you will forever be stuck with the status quo. It is a deliberately artificial hurdle to get your own way. What's your threshold? 66%? 75%? What if 65.9% voted to Leave, should they be ignored? It was a clear difference. Ignore the percentages, 1m more people voted to leave than to remain so just get over it. It is done.
I keep hearing people saying the Remain camp lost or that they are sore losers.
This shows a deep lack of understanding of the impact of the result (assuming parliament acts on it): regardless of how we voted in the referendum we are either *all* losers or we are *all* winners.
Looking at the state of sterling, the FTSE250, the FTSE100, the increased cost of government borrowing due to our credit rating down grades, the sudden realisation that not only were the leave campaign lying about this mythical £350 million/week, but also what they planned to spend it it on, the back pedaling on immigration/free movement, and the fact that the remaining goverment leadership wants us to remain members of the single market with no longer any influence over its rules (what's that I hear you say about regaining sovereignty? Sorry not even that!) (not that actually we'd lost it in the first place, so it's actually very easy to argue that Brexit reduces our sovereignty), it looks increasingly like we *all* lost.
You are looking far too short term my friend. Any decision like this is strictly a long game which is why anyone predicting we would be worse off ad infinitum is full of shit.
They played the all-things-to-all-men game brilliantly while Remain simply forgot about the EU and concentrated on telling us that Leave were liars and scoundrels.They played the all-things-to-all-men game brilliantly while Remain simply forgot about the EU and concentrated on telling us that Leave were liars and scoundrels.
If the benefits of staying in the EU were so clear and so numerous it may have paid for the Remain camp to tell us what that are rather than adopt the "sky will fall in" tactic. People do not like chicken little campaigning as it smacks of desperation and I believe it's part of the British psyche to rebel against foreign leaders (Obama et al), big business and the 1% telling us we shouldn't do something as if we're naughty children. Treat people like idiots and that's how they'll end up making you look.
I think Remain should have been able to win but that their campaign was full of contempt for the common man and it cost them dearly.
As in his previous work, an attacker needs to be able to infect the target to plant the badware that gathers (for example) passwords from the keyboards and put that data into a modulated fan signal.
His definition of crossing the air-gap must differ from mine. If you can infect the target at the level necessary to perform the subsequent leak then I'd argue there isn't really a proper air-gap there. Some fuckwit plugging shit into a machine that can infect it isn't really air-gapped it just doesn't have a network connection and, to my mind, that isn't the same thing.
There aren't that many COBOL and Fortran programmers left, and no one is learning those languages these days
Also worth noting that Fortran tends to be taught as the programming language of choice to physics undergraduates - apparently it's quite popular in that area - it has an international standards body and is targeted at scientists. It is also pretty damn fast (http://www.hindawi.com/journals/sp/2014/870146/abs/) and, to emphasise a point made above, it is used for large numerical calculations (http://www.moreisdifferent.com/2015/07/16/why-physicsts-still-use-fortran/)
In the field of high performance computing (HPC), of which large scale numerical simulation is a subset, there are only two languages in use today — C/C++ and “modern Fortran” (Fortran 90/95/03/08).
@ Aodhhan: university education or not, he's a damn site more eloquent, articulate and intelligent than you are. Not everyone wants or needs to piss 10s of thousands of dollars against the wall for a think by numbers university education. If he doesn't have one then he's demonstrated they really aren't all that necessary these days. Some of the World's larger employers are starting to see it that way too.
You might also want to note in your empty headed rant that one of his major points is the shithouse and missing legislation that enables the political classes to shit on anyone at any time in Australia. The gist being that, even if it's meaningless, the US still has controlling legislation versus the Australian free-for-all.
HTTPS everywhere and SSL observatory, courtesy of EFF. Always be wary of free wifi - I certainly wouldn't use it unless I was using laptop with a Live CD due to the possibility of malware let alone MITM. Plenty are poorly setup, maintained and secured. Think of using it as being like having unprotected nooky. You may get away with it quite a lot, but then again....
The only thing that changes here is what a Judge can determine at the end of a trial, after the jury has returned a guilty verdict. A Judge is still free to determine what ever sentence he sees fit, but it can't be longer than 10 years.
What twaddle. If the ceiling is raised from 2 to 10 years then Judges are going to use that extra headroom - they certainly aren't going to keep giving out no more than 2 years are they? This law change has bullying and usage creep written into it.
Where do you get the idea that this is about big media. The biggest losses are from small creators. Big media suffer loses but not on the same scale. Small creators are looking to sell stuff to large publishers, large publishers reduce the amount they are willing to pay because of piracy.
Large publishers reduce the amount they are willing to pay because they are greedy bastards and hold all the power in the relationship. Piracy is neither here nor there - you cannot count piracy as lost sales because the vast majority simply are not.
In general I believe that financial crimes should carry a custodial sentence for the more serious ones and financial penalties with asset seizure for the whole spectrum. i.e. you shouldn't be able to commit a £1m fraud and get 6 months and/or £100k fine, it should be £1m forfeiture + £100k fine + custodial as appropriate.
Yep. Saw this line
“Nobody’s going to go after a teenager in their bedroom, unless that teenager is operating a serious scale pirate site. Just as with physical goods, nobody goes after the small fry.”
and remembered that what it really means is that if you run a search site that allows people to locate links to content but host no content yourself then you'll get 10 years unless of course your search site is called Google.
Here at El Reg we think his remarks about technology are far more dangerous, because as we all know Big Data and the Blockchain will revolutionise everything, more or less instantly, so that the Internet of Soil becomes a reality and deals with that depletion problem.
Everyone knows the soil needs electrolytes, stupid.
Sizzles I think you misunderstood me. When I say pre unity I am talking about why use mint vs Ubuntu and the chief reason was installed codecs out of the box - it just worked. Post unity, and without codecs, the chief selling point is just it doesn't have unity. They are undermining their advantages.
Perhaps you didn't notice the scuffle in the Balkans? The odd touch of genocide occurring on the EU's doorstep? Strictly speaking not the EU but pretty much Europe. If you're basically stating that the Germans haven't started another war then you've obviously missed the economic and political colonisation that's been going on. They just got a bit smarter over how they ended up ruling Europe - why use tanks when politics and promises will suffice.
The bit I find amusing about the Remain camp's campaign is when they talk about things being so much worse if we leave. They obviously don't realise that, if their points are true, then we are screwed either way. Do they seriously think that if the UK votes to remain then everything will be as it was before? No, the EU will push even harder on the UK to integrate and it will have little ability to refuse as Dave gained no ground in his negotiations and the populous would have just voted that they prefer being in the EU. There's no way the EU will let the UK piss about on the periphery after this very public event.
Well Mathew only 7% on FTTN are choosing 100Mbps would that be becuase they are unable to receive such a speed.
That's more likely because of:
1. Poor backbone infrastructure struggling to serve the speed
2. Shit links off the rock. If there's poor links to the rest of the world then your speed matters less. I'm starting to struggle to saturate my 30Mbps cable connection, so why try for 100?
One of the downsides with the open source ecosystem is that it allows the petulant child types to take their ball and run away rather than have grown up discussions to reach mutual agreement on how to solve a problem. It's very easy to get some key people and fork-off rather than have the tough conversations that may be necessary to force change. This would seem like one such occasion.