"A lot of NHS software was written by people at that time "
If Amber Rudd actually gave a s**t this is what should be investigated regarding the NHS attack.
1)Did the contractors decide to do this or did NHS management (IT or general) force them to?
2)Why haven't they stripped this BS out of the UI code? Is the supplier extorting the NHS or are they just too incompetent (no docs on the code and all the devs have p***ed off)? My cursory look at this is that iSoft and Cerner seem to be the main culprits but I'm no expert.
I'd suggest the real scandal is that 17 years after it's release (and 2 years after MS dropped support for it) the NHS still seems shackled to an OS that's what 2,3 generations behind the current desktop release.
And BTW how many of those PC's actually access that core software?