"Smart Meter Bill"
"smart meters will be offered to every household and business by the end of 2020"
Hopefully most of which will say "My 6YO could hack that PoS" and tell the offeror where to stick it.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Citizen.
We note from your comment that you are failing to apply the principles of "Double think" correctly.
Please review the relevant section of the Citizenship Manual, as a repeated failure will require you to report to the Ministry of Love for more extensive re-education.
<Signed>
Big Brother.
And that's why her Maj is paid the big £.
Saying that out loud without blurting out "Is she f**king kidding me?" takes decades of practice.
Following practice in Trumpistan America prepare for a Bill with the words "Freedom," "Privacy," "Democracy" or "Patriot" in the title which will aim to destroy any of the first three and would be a deep anathema to any reasonable notion of the fourth.
3 little words.
Public Private Partnership.
The UK has had very low interest rates for most of the decade.
And no govt with the balls to actually do what you asked. They have however let companies build schools and hospitals and charge local authorities and the NHS for them
Which will net the companies involved 600-700% profits over the course of the contracts.
Well TBF it has only been a 152 days since the inauguration.
OTOH it has been 152 days since the inauguration and the Republicans do have control of both Houses.
I thought there was a shed load of laws that need passing or scrapping (from the Republicans PoV) all set to go.
Was it as creepy as the video of that Cabinet meeting seen a few days ago?
Creepier than a meeting a meeting of the board of SPECTRE, even without the furniture being wired to the mains.
As for Ms Catz. Isn't everyone thinking "Too old." (and not Blonde enough).
As it always was.
Microsoft has no friends in the software business. Only competitors to destroy or consume
anti virus represents another niche for them to colonize.
Although TBF to MS they basically created the AV business in the first place.
With their ongoing inability to write secure code. 2017 and still with the stack overflows?
No it's not if you study business, not IT.
Gates went to Harvard to study Business, not IT.
MS's "business" is making money by creating (and maintaining) a monopoly.
TBH quite a lot of companies would like to have this model but few can achieve it.
The first rule of (RL) monopoly is no one calls it a monopoly (while doing everything possible to ensure it remains one.).
You've got to keep the magic money tree fed.
You provide the app, "They" provide the cores to process it.
Huge caveats. Can (has?) the memory encryption processor code been independently audited or is open source? Can the Hypervisor UI be trusted (IE when you click "encrypted" on the setup options it is actually enabled)?
We've seen the f**kup Intel supplied with it's MIPS based unit that appeared to have just been cut N pasted in wholesale, along with its software.
An interesting legal question. Could the USG declare such systems illegal as it would spoil the NSA's ability to snoop
So if you spend a lot more money you get a box with a lot more processing power.
Now yes it sounds like a good deal 20x speed for 10x money.
But the Pi is a baseline for ARM performance, not the pinnacle.
There are a lot of ARM based processors, and quite a lot of ARM based boards.
And you do that because you've got a shed load of software (and tools) written (and tuned) to run on that ISA.
If you don't have that investment to protect they the x86 instruction set has to stand on its own two feet.
At it's core is it's a typical 1960/1970 microcoded complex instruction set. designed when instruction set design tools only existed inside mainframe mfgs by (essentially) hardware engineers.
So it's got lots of kool stuff that does one single task on one single data type (which might be tied to a specific register), which is also a nightmare to generate code for from a high level language. In 1979 (when they 8086 was launched) this was not a high priority (except on Burroughs mainframes, which were famous for being programmed only in HLL's).
The problem is if you sell a cheap x86 processor people start to ask WTF do they have to pay such prices for the high end stuff.
One option (which I think some very cheap 8051 versions use) would be to go with an internal bit serial core that retains x86 compatibility. Then there would a reason why they were so cheap (small die size and more clocks to do stuff) but you could have many more cores as an option.
Another would have been to keep Strong ARM (then the fastest ARM implementation) and said "It's not x86, but we sell a shed load of them and make a decent profit, and as long as people want maximum performance for ARM we will own the market" IOW Accept they are a chip company and whatever the market wants in the best way possible. In the long run owning quite a lot of a big market beats owning 100% of a tiny market (as the British GEC company eventually discovered).
But the day is coming when Intel's advantages will disappear.
When all transistors are 1 atom wide everyone has maximum density.
Then we will see how vital compatibility with an architecture designed around the time "Saturday Night Fever" and "A New Hope" were on first run at your local cinema (or "multiplex" for younger readers).
Because sometimes it will be the wrong thing to do?
Because devs are compulsive knob twiddlers?
Because in developing very large programs devs will favor a faster compile "dev version" of the program than the "full safety check" version, and then forget to change the settings for the compile to the release version?
Pick any or all of the above.
"developers weren't building their code with sufficient stack protection checks."
But y'know that secure coding stuff is right tricky and I imagine it's hard work. Let' see what the article has about a fix.
"The fix, by the way, is to rebuild and reinstall the dynamic library ld.so and executables with gcc's -fstack-check feature, which should kill Stack Clash dead."
So no, doesn't look like that hard a task to me. But I can already hear the squeal's of "But it'll hurt performance."
I'll remind devs of DE Knuth's comment about "Premature optimization is the root of most evil." True then. Still true now. Most code does not spend the bulk of its time where you think it does. You should also factor in how often your oh-so-clever creation actually runs.
If the "normal use case" is it runs 10 times a day and takes 10 seconds, but the secure version takes 11 seconds that's a whole 10 extra seconds a day. IR WTF cares?
The fact that developing an exploit for this opens up a bunch of *nix variants suggest this would have been a very cost effective tool for "budget minded black hats" to work on.
And by "budget minded black hats" I'm talking about the T&FLA's who spy on people.
Developers. This one is on you. Update your build options to stop this happening. I'm quite sure GCC is not the only compiler suite that has this option available.
This just seems unimaginable without aircon.
I've spent some time in Arizona and the closest I've come to frost bite was the nights in an Arizona motel room.
They seemed to think all visitors like aircon up to 11.
But I think humidity is the biggest PITA. I met someone who worked in Hong Kong. They said that even with aircon they were changing their shirt three times a day. I've often wondered what SF is like. People say it's cold and damp (the old Mark Twain like about "The coldest Winter I spent was Summer in San Francisco," boom boom) , but that's by Californian standards.
It seems they are planning to apply the "Magnifying glass" tool seen on ARM computes of the 80's to VR.
Yes, coping with spectable wearers is tough (and I'm not sure how well other AR/VR deal with them) but let's see how well the whole system works first.
Sorry, but this is an area with lots of previous very dodgy claims about what can, will and is going to be done.
Good. Maybe they should consider running out now.
Anyone want to bet the suppliers will be changing their name again soon?
As for those fees, well buying a zero day is not cheap.
Interesting point that Blackberry is the most expensive one still.
Note. These are not the data fetishists of the UK and US who want to spy on everyone all the time forever.
They are crooked, corrupt members of the government.
Which suggests you're going to see planets with a certain set of properties.
And they are not likely to be those of an Earth.
That said this is an excellent result for a first serious pass at the problem. I fully expect that the team have learned a lot about what is possible in building a planet hunting telescope and how to improve such a mission. While the mission design seems unlikely to find very Earth like planets the statistical analysis of planets found versus types of sun surveyed should (if done carefully) reveal some interesting patters to help inform people who model how solar systems form.
However the Fermi paradox remains. It's definitely looking like there are plenty of planets on which life can evolve and at least some of them should get to be intelligent.
So why isn't anyone talking? Is the human race too early, or too late to the party?
Americans have statistically worse home security?
Americans have (on average) faster broadband?
Americans have more potential credit to harvest?
But uPnP. ? I'd heard some gamers needed it back in the day but now?
As always, if you don't need it why is it on? If you do need it why is it accessible from the far side of your router?
I have a possible defense.
PHB "I see from our records Mr Smith that you did the last year mods on this program and we've confirmed you were the John Smith on the change log."
Me:" I could only afford the low res brain scan for my personality recording and they may have missed a few things. What's a COBOL developer?"
PHB "The computer language, COBOL."
Me."No, I mean what's a developer?"
I think the thing people find very odd about the DoD is this.
Despite being in the habit of invading foreign countries (they seem to have started getting over Viet Nam when they invaded Grenada and have been putting in regular practice ever since) and having one of the words biggest and most technologically advanced armies on the planet they don't seem to absorbed one simple lesson.
Quite a lot of people don't like them.
That, plus the fact they have various assorted kinds of information that could be financially or militarily beneficial for unauthorized outsiders to know, means that they are (to coin a phrase)
"A big f**king target."
Despite this they seem to behave with an attitude to IT security that would embarrass, say McDonalds.
It's 2017 and it seems parts of the DoD still think this is the 1970's.
Given the American Mid West can reach those sort of temperatures it seems likely Sweden could as well.
I take your point I'd also expect most places to keep that sort of stuff in a shed, possibly heated but at least insulated.
I'm not so sure about buses. I could see this as being quite handy if you don't have garage parking or if you find yourself staying out all night somewhere and worried it won't start, or hold charge in the morning.
TBH my instinct is the fact it stops working as an electrolyte if it gets too hot, shutting down thermal runaway (and hence those Li battery fires that unfortunate headlines from time to time) is the big feature for this tech. Provided the internal pressure is not too high of course. People regularly handle 6 atm pressure vessels.
Beer because that's what a lot of those pressure vessels contain.
A rational person would indeed have realized that someone who's encouraging them to kill themselves probably does not exactly have their best interests at heart.
Shock news. Depressed people have a distorted view of their relationship to the world (and wheather or not it will change) , to the point where killing themselves actually seems like quite a good idea.
You can't understand it.
I can't understand it.
But it seems like a good idea to them.
Or perhaps it's time to repeal the fact that you have to express a preference for voting when you register to vote?
Actually the suggestion was not to prove you'd voted.
It was to verify that a vote could be identified back to a real person, if necessary.
Understand that the politicians are just the visible part of this "Coalition of the willing," as GW Bush put it.
You need to identify the cabal of data fetishist civil servants in the Home Office (or Interior Ministry in many European countries) and their allies in the spying agencies that are pushing this data fetishist agenda.
Without identifying them the (violent) removal of one bunch of sock puppets will simply be used as a pretext to justify more spying laws, as has each recent previous incident in the UK and France.
I don't think anyone should be surprised that such an interface exists.
The problem is how many lines can be monitored simultaneously and what amount of judicial scrutiny is needed to authorize it?
The German proposal seems hell bent on reducing that "judicial scrutiny" to nothing.
Joseph Wambaugh wrote "Police work is only ever easy in a police state."
This sounds like they want to make police work "easy." This should never be a goal of policy.
It's not about having an interest.
It's about continually collecting the information so that (if at sometime in the future) someone does have an interest in you they can simply look up all of your past online behavior at will.
After all it's all about keeping the suspects citizens safe.
And with this system the authorities can find out exactly who feels safe whenever they like.
Doesn't that make you feel "safe"?