Aha! So..you have a desire for a piano to fall on a past or future Home Secretary or...
Thus neatly demonstrating the proof of the Cardinal's comment
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Not at all.
She's very much a part of the "Coalition of the willing" as "W" put it.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." as Upton Sinclair put it.
Where would a Home Secretary be without a sea of "threats" to wave at voters come election time?
Oh dear.
In order to avoid any hint of a suggestion that I might be seen to be inciting a terrorist act I should state that I have no desire to see a piano drop on Amber Rudd's head, no plans to drop a piano on Amber Rudd's head and no knowledge of any plans by anyone else to drop a piano on Amber Rudd's head.
This is not to say that at some point in the future Ms Rudd might find herself underneath a falling piano, as past performance (not being underneath a falling piano) is no guarantee of future safety (but then it never was :-( ), merely that I have no desire to arrange for the aforesaid musical instrument to descend on the aforesaid current Home Secretary, or any knowledge of anyone else who might wish to do so.
I trust that clarifies things.
And here's why.
Govt "We wants it"
Tech companies "The mathematics don't allow it. You compromise one, you compromise all. Ecommerce also becomes vulnerable to any compromised device in the chain between the customer and seller."
Govt "We wants it"
And that's about as mature as it will get.
Rudd is playing that classic politicians gambit of conflating 2 issues. Access to devices and people when there is actual evidence of a serious crime and the desire to have access to all people's behavior all the time.
I don't know who really penned her piece in the Torygraph but the implied split of "real" and by implication "not real" people (who want e2e encryption) is a very two edged sword.
I think politicians who believe this sort of twaddle are "unreal," but in common with Conservative party behavior I am in fact using it as a code phrase.
For "f**king delusional" in their case (as in "Amber Rudd is unreal in her belief that e2e encryption that can be disabled on demand").
Incidentally she reckons she's got a shot at stepping into May's shoes as the current generation of wannabe PM's are viewed as getting either too old or are too Marmite for the other candidates (Gove supporters hate Johnson and Davis. Johnson supporters hate Gove and Davis etc).
Wouldn't make any difference.
She has spouted exactly what the group of data fetishists who are her "advisors" on this subject tell her.
Exactly as at least the last 9 Home Secretaries have done.
A piano could drop on her head tomorrow and within a week her replacement would be spouting the same line.
Yes, because that's an experiment, not a full size (or even near full size) power plant.
Also it pre-dates their finding a way to do breeding with only a single salt mix, not needing 2 different ones and the development of the "sparging" process to filter reactions products from the the salt pool while the reactor is running.
The Chinese projects (and wasn't there an Indian one in the works as well?) should be much closer to a fully operational system.
Yes it would be good if the country that invented this concept did pursue it more aggressively but that does not seem to be happening.
I will note that with both the Three Mile Island PWR (turning a $1Bn asset into a $2Bn liability) and Fukishima BWR the major current reactor types have demonstrated they can be unsafe, but that does not necessarily show MSR is necessarily more safe.
I take it you don't live in the UK then?
Roughly 20% of all UK electricity comes from nuclear. Cut 18.8GW from the available UK power budget and people will notice.
And a wind turbine that only runs 3% of the time (and the UK has allowed some to be built that do only operate that often) won't cut it for the UK consumer.
Might I suggest "sustainable energy without the hot air" PDF here ?
Hard to believe the only country in Europe that's surrounded by sea has spent effectively FA on tide (predictable) or wave (vast energy) systems.
But they have.
Ever hear of the term " Technology Readiness Level "?
MSR's are (potentially) better but they have 2 issues, one technological and one economic.
PWR's are TRL9 because the USN picked up the development tab 7 decades ago. Then the USG pinned all its remaining money on the Sodium cooled fast breeder reactor (which demonstrates what happens when Physicists with no engineering understanding design stuff :-( ).
Leaving MSR's with a TRL of about 3, if they were funded.
Issue 2. Economically this is the "Gillette" business model. Reactor builders basically make their money selling the operators their fuel rods, which are a little bit incompatible with every other mfgs designs. So a design that can (loosely) be refueled by a person tipping bags of the relevant salts through a door is not going to be popular with any of the current reactor companies.
However if you can form a company to design such a reactor (or help fund one if any exist), then get a test reactor built (because getting someone to buy one "off the plan" is going to be pretty difficult) then you're home and dry.
How dreadful. Those fiendish orientals, eh?
Except you have the situation backwards.
It started when Westinghouse bought what they thought was a construction company to build reactor buildings that turned out not to be fit for purpose. What to do? Simple gt bought by a foreign company and have them bail us out.
Now Westinghouse is f**ked and they took Toshiba with them.
Nice work, Westinghouse management. First you failed to do due diligence, then shafted a better company to save your collective skins.
Westinghouse owned the PWR business because the USN picked up the bill for developing them for submarines.
A clean slate design to build reactors that didn't power submarines and didn't need enriched Uranium (and all the issues around bomb making that go with it) would be a very different beast.
Internet email was invented by Mr Postel.
Come on, did no one think that mildly amusing?
Email does have to get upgraded, especially establishing who really sent it and in transit security.
We no longer live in a world where people can be trusted only to send "safe" messages and neither can the relay stations between them and us be trusted to either not peek nor actively change the message.
Imagine that.
And it's only taken 33 years for someone to try it.
Core War here
The joker of course is have you developed a system perfectly adapted for finding only the malware that the attacking ML system produces.
BTW there is also a Linux GCC optimizer that builds optimally efficient assembler instruction sequences for very frequently executed code. IIRC it was limited to 5 instructions, but recent versions can do sequences up to 7 instructions long (this is one of those combinatoric explosion problems)
Does indeed smell like they wrote the results to prove the conclusions.
SOP for any con-sultancy.
Which is why any such "independent" report should be read with a more or less large bag of salt.
Factoid. IIRC BALPA chairman was at one time Conservative Chairman Norman Tebbett.
was developed in the mid 60''s for use in prosthetics.
The design was literally a nylon stocking with a balloon inside it driven by air pressure (< 3 atm, which is low for pneumatic systems).
It was later used by Shadow Robotics to develop huamn scale (in size, weight and strength) robots.
I'm not sure how non linear it was.
Yes, had a very clean architecture, and AFAIK the only 8 bitter to have its own MMU (although IIRCHitachi released a Z80 instruction set compatible device with on chip MMU) giving a 2MB address space.
I could never figure out why it's clock speed did not rise in the same way as thigns like the Z80. I did not know (thank you Wikipedia) that it was built round a large PLA, rather than microcode. The microcode allowed non memory access instructions to run faster.
I think a 6809 was an option on the "Tube" interface of the BBC Microcomputer, which taught the Acorn team a lot about the trade offs of different mfg processors. Valuable lessons when it came to designing the ARM.
If the previous product was rock solid and this is now happening that's the issue right there.
Not overly bothered by a UI, if the underlying capability work and it's adequately accessible.
Apparently in the new version of Skype, it's not.
That's easy to explain in terms of corporate behavior.
When an apex predator invades a rivals territory, after it has forced the rival into a display of submissiveness it then proceeds to mark the territory as its own.
Usually by defecating on every part of that territory.
IOW this is MS p**sing on Skype's customer base to mark them as their own.
I'll bet not as many claim to be using it but don't because a)It's too complicated b)They trashed their address book.
That classic old MS gem.
"It's completely compatible" with your home version of <whatever MS app you're using>
Oh no it isn't.
Didn't people fall for that BS with why you had to have Windows on a palmtop?
Obviously not her.
I mean the nest of vermin cabal of senior civil servants who've been whispering in the ears of Ms Rudd and a long line of her equally clueless predecessors since at least the days of Tony Blair.
It doesn't, but normal light pulses in conventional systems (despite the Gbs data rates) are made up of millions (billions?) of photons.
Obviously you can then afford to lose quite a few before their loss is noticed.
The gift that just keeps giving.
Seriously my first thought was "This is still a thing in 2017"
But
It's been around for decades, it's core is well understood, it's easy to extend and anyone wanting to replace it would have the uphill battle of getting everyone to use their language instead.
What did surprise me is it's even used inside mobile phones between chips. Who would know what was used inside those, and who would care?
Isn't that the point of FOSS?
Take a copy of the source code.
The company dies, the app (and the systems built on top of it) live on. As others have noticed the NHS as a whole is quite large enough to support a health care Linux distro and Moorefields eye hospital already has a baseline FOSS EMR system which could be extended to other specialties.
Sounds like the VC wanted to run the company into the ground so they could get it sold ASAP and cash out.
An ethical fail for most people.
A cause for a performance bonus or promotion at Google.
Googlespeak "Your privacy is important to us"
Translation.
Sell a data broker information once and you'll have to sell more to them tomorrow.
Sell them the processed product and they have to come back to us forever.
The people.
Saying things (not necessarily about them) authoritarians cannot hear.
Thinking things (not necessarily about them) authoritarians cannot know.
Doing things (not necessarily against them) authoritarians cannot stop.
If their behavior was not so draconian would it not be simply pathetic? The only real "terrorist" of such people is the one inside their own heads. As it was for Stalin, Putin and May.
Although I'd thought AGV became a thing in large warehouses in large companies in the 90's.
Once you get into taking individual customers (and will this be a "Johnnycab" taxi?) or do you want people to buy a whole vehicle to do this?
The question is do you really want fully autonomous vehicles? Or vehicles that can radically reduce the number of drivers a business needs to employ?
The latter could give significant business benefits and start ratcheting up the competence of these systems toward full autonomy.
The former is very much harder.
And they in turn suckered Toshiba good too. I'll bet it wasn't a happy day when the Tosh Board realized what had happened. :-(
Lots of fail to go round here.
The problem is the Westinghouse. section.
Cut it loose, dig a big hole and drop it down it.
BUG() sounds like something you'd use on a live production server that you wanted to die, before it got infected with something.
But that's not a development environment.
I'd be pretty p**sed trying to diagnose a (supposed) OS fault with no context, no idea what (if any) apps were running, memory map etc.
And of course a completely wiped machine, once it reboots.
Bayes factor is meant to compare 2 hypotheses to see which is more likely.
If both are equal then it's 0.5. However wikipedia has a list of 6 possible candidate exo-moons, so this would not be the first possible detection IOW there is some statistical data that can shift the probabilities.
I guess if its 2 then it's "Somewhat more likely, but by no means certain."
(Probably) nothing to see here even after the results from Hubble arrive. Move along.
We know how susceptible US companies have been to pressure from government spooks asking them to put back doors in their code and set default encryption algorithms to have weaker default choices.
If you're used to behaving a certain way it's not very surprising that you expect everyone else to do the same.
And following Snowden it's clear that some parts of the US govt are very used to behaving a certain way.