Well done. I hope they got considerably more out of FaceBook.
Since they have considerably more to give.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Except that would require their parents to understand something about modern technology.
This all started when "Claire Perry," some annoymouse backbench Tory nobody, organized a debate attended by about 8 MPs on this. Next thing she's Cameron's "Child Sexualization and Exploitation Czar."
All because she couldn't figure out how to set the age filters on a browser.
Why be knowledgeable when ignorance is so richly rewarded?
If you don't notice it (or that's how you write and speak generally) you're probably exactly the target mark(et) for these guys.
Simples.
Americans. You should be disgusted that your system made the only viable choice between Clinton and Trump.
Don't fix the candidates. Fix the system that filters out better ones.
And then David Davies decided there was no need to do anything so formal as y'know "impact assessments" because the departments would just be doing it, rather than assessing doing it.
So no time has been allocated to sort out little details like
a) Which of the 85 systems in one department have to be scrapped; which amended.
b) Which systems are the most important? They might not be the biggest, but they may hurt the most people hardest if they are not ready to play. See a) if they need to be scrapped or re-written.
c)Can you scope the changes for each system? To what extent are they "table driven," and there for configured by changing a config parameter file (assuming someone's kept a copy of the config file format).
Not forgetting some of these systems were written in proprietary 4GL's for things like ICL mainframes in the 1970's and 80's and many of the people with those skills (never mind domain knowledge of the specific system itself) are retired or flat out dead.
A common misconception.
It's actually a by product of the brain parasite they get infected with when they get the job.*
*How else do you explain the monotone line on pervasive state surveillance that the last 9 (10?) Home Secretaries have spouted?
What majority?
They have to call in the DUP if they want an absolute majority. Pre election they had an absolute majority.
But then May seemed to have the first original idea she'd had in her entire life.
This is what happens when you promote what's basically an ambitious coaster, who just does whatever their senior civil servants tell them, into the top job.
Funny how this Brexit thing works isn't it?
He's an interesting one.
A UK company offers a service to UK business which manages their staff HR issues.
The data is held on servers in another EU country.
Post Brexit, does EU protection extend to those persons data and if the UK regime is ruled inadequate would the company be prevented from accessing their own data?
It does, but probably not in the way you mean.
The UK is the only country that had fully orbital capable launch and voluntarily gave it up.
Because "Those nice Americans" would launch it for free because of the "special" relationship the UK has with them.
Did they f**k. :-( .
Either you're in a tent (any tent) p**sing out or you're outside dodging random streams of the yellow stuff.
The UK had an Empire to fall back on but 2 World Wars and a $5Bn loan (in 1945 $) from that country they have that "special" relationship with f**ked that right up.
In size, age, cultural complexity and plate tectonics the UK has a lot more in common with the rest of Europe than it will ever have with the US, or Canada, or Russia, India or China, all of which are continent sized countries in their own right.
Hello codejunky.
Surprised you took so long to join the discussion.
And what is HMG's response
"We'll build our own global positioning constellation."
Are they f**king kidding me?
So that alleged £350m/week going to the NHS not going to happen then with this kind of spending.
But being stupidly eager is not a crime.
Deliberately, grossly inflating the value of the business transactions they think the are buying actually is a crime.
Although you'd think the auditors should have spotted some warning signs in the accounts.
They seemed to have been remarkably silent in this process.
I wonder if they have a cache of emails repeatedly saying "This valuation is BS," and spelling out why it is BS in detail?
In Germany in 2015
At first I'd thought they were talking about a mini synchrotron (first done by IBM in the early 80's) but their approach seems to be much more efficient at converting input power into X-rays using (relatively) well understood technology (highish power electron currents and ps IR laser pulses) to make X-rays through "Inverse Compton scattering."
Naturally there are a) High hurdles to making this work with a compact syncrotron) b) They say they have solutions for them.
That said we are apparently talking 3 orders of magnitude more power than alternatives, which I'd guess knocks exposure time from hours to seconds. Critical if you want to put this in a production environment.
It looks like someone has finally built a viable high power X-ray laser.
BTW One of things people don't often realize about laser fusion is that all that laser energy is to turn the metal capsule into (in effect) X-ray emitters to cook the deuterium/tritium fuel pellet.
Obviously if you can skip all that malarky and get straight down to just zapping the pellet directly with a lot of X-rays your efficiency goes up quite a lot.
Handy, given the eyewatering some the USG spent on their last laser fusion system.
Which suggests they might start seeing just how much their con-tractor was marking up some items, and (maybe) not full for quite so much con-tractor BS in future. Yes I have taken a shedload of meds to say that.
Transparency.
We've heard of it
And when the s**t hits the fan you need stuff you don't have to p**s about with installing that does what you expect when you expect it.
Interesting this this fix got the biggest cheer.
"Bout f**king time" it took so long to do it.
Those brave souls who fearlessly championed walking away from the UK closest neighbours and a trading block of 440 million people in favor of f**k knows what a glorious and brighter future.
Let their names never be forgotten.
Along with their great heroes.
Murdoch of News International.
Desmond of the Daily Express
Harmsworth (Viscount Rothermere) of the Daily Mail.
Whose relentless, endless support has done so much to make this LSD trip vision come to pass.
The British people will never forget what you did for them, and nor should they.
are f**ked.
Only Pig farmers survive in all scenarios.
The only way it's BAU for "British Farming Ltd" is for DEFRA to maintain all the CAP payments.
Otherwise upland sheep, lowland dairy and cattle, arable and worst case even chicken production is all roadkill.
But hey maybe the fishermen won't have to abide by the hated fishing quota system?
Err, no. They will for at least 2 years after Brexit, maybe more.
Which is a bit ironic given the stage was called Centaur because it had two heads (engines).
A 401 is pretty much the baby Atlas V.
Which means there is less to go wrong, which is very attractive on a long ride to Mars. And it's cheaper. All of which are pretty attractive features.
It looks more like configuring physical stuff, like fluid connections, or maybe signal processing blocks?
I'm imagining some kind of small chamber (like a chip carrier package) with bunch of these inside with the function set by the pattern being reconfigured.
Now the thing about the FPGA is they have long lines and high capacitance --> relatively low clock frequencies (100s of MHz, rather than GHz) , but maybe if you can but the elements directly together they could shorten those lines.
Still waiting for molecular scale 3d processing, given all the action on a conventional Silicon chip is withing 10micrometres of the surface.
The "Grey goo" scenario has indeed been played out on numerous occasions.
This thing is nowhere near anything remotely intelligent.
That said the fact that a bunch of these are controlled by a central source IE the AC drive system, might be a redeeming feature.
But at this point?
More a solution looking for a problem.
What arrant bu***hit.
Protecting their market share, their relationship with Fort Meade and Redmond are critical priorities.
People pay through the nose to run Windows and the MS stack. If they don't need to do that they don't need Intel.
But the playing field is leveling.With linewidths down to 90 atoms across even Intel's lead in smaller transistors will vanish
No. It's designed to have the control rod in 2 positions. In or out.
Most of power tracking is done by the Stirlings pulling more or less heat from the system.
The team behind KRUSTY are very aware of the SL-1 situation and prompt criticallity issues.
Actually a bit safer.
U235 is a low level Alpha emitter. They can be stopped by a pair of rubber gloves (watch the SNAP10a assembly video on YT). It's cold to the touch. It doesn't warm up till the chain reaction is started in LEO.
The PuO pellets inside an RTG are glowing red hot from the moment they are made. PuO is a very poor thermal conductor so they have to be small otherwise the gradient across the pellet is enough to crack it.
You can't stop PuO vigorously fissioning. With KRUSTY you remove the reflector and it's an inert lump of metal, even in sea water, which is quite a good moderator (part of the reason this reactor is a fast neutron spectrum design which does not use a moderator).
No.
RTGs run on Pu240, which is very difficult to make and limited to at most about 500W at beginning of life. You could hook it out of spent nuclear fuel, but Merkins refuse to process the stuff. Even on site, even if it's going straight back inside a PWR.
You can't switch RTG's off to save the power for later. The baseline KRUSTY is 2x that. The preferred size for Mars is 20x that size. It can run a fair sized ion engine on the way.
Reactors can be started and shut down at any point in the flight (in fact it would not be started until at least in Earth orbit).
Quite true.
As this is the HEU (or "Bomb grade" as some wags like to call it) and was essentially available cheap to the programme as the US has been at a bit of a loss with what to do with all the cores they stripped out of the bombs from the last round of arms reduction talks.
Mines the jacket with "Special Ordnance" on the back.
It is sealed for life.
It's not designed to be taken apart or refueled (although being a single lump of metal with some holes in it "reprocessing" is pretty simple by nuclear standards).
The system uses negative feedback. The more power you take out the hotter it runs. The less you take out the slower it runs. That's without moving the control rod a cm.
Stick the control rod fully in it shuts down entirely. It's expected to be moveable within 1 week of full shut down.
No.
Unlike it's predecessor KRUSTY was designed to be started by (basically) pulling out the control rod and letting the heat pipes warm up to operating temperature, around 850c (which is cold by the standards of the nuclear fuel in PWRs)
And standing very well back of course.