Is it just me
who just keeps seeing their name as the British Pornographic Industry.
Which would be a *much* more useful trade association.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
IIRC Babbage was *very* nervous about IP theft and some of the drawings were *deliberately* misleading, although it would be interesting to see if that was the case with the Difference Engine.
The other issue is weather it would have worked with 19th century levels of mechanical engineering precision.
The construction of the DE suggests it *should* but does all that *decision* making logic make the parts alignments *much* tighter?
and of course there is the £5m over 10 years needed...
"In fact it is so good that many Trusts use the private sector to help deliver services they have undertaken to provide."
Funny the rule I heard was if a private provider's operation goes sideways they *dump* it on the NHS.
IIRC BUPA was the only one which did this and did *not* re-imburse for the costs (because it was *not* a formal agreement).
But perhaps the times have changed. ...
"So if BT and Virgin are so crap at delivering service availability in the middle of birmingham, to the state the councilors think they have to spend public money to meet the cities business and domestic goals, this says tons about the private company's management teams."
Indeed it does.
The *only* real priority of a public company is to make *profit*.
But for some this means *stopping* any new entrants as well.
The idea that they would use *some* of their profits to roll out their bandwidth as a sort of "long term" investment suggests a level of vision which in large UK companies is simply *laughable*
UK banks did it when there was a *suggestion* that the strict rules on who could be in a local credit union were under review. The banks did not want the competition, *despite* the fact the areas they were talking about barely had any banks in them to *begin* with.
Market failure. What market failure? I see no oligopoly here.
Another interesting point for the climate modellers to incorporate
And the equally interesting factoid
"Ummm no... Our body temperatures are maintained at that level because it is a balance point between optimum speed of cellular reactions v/s speed of denaturation of proteins at higher temperatures v/s energy expenditure and a couple other minor factors."
Which implies an environment where you can *dump* heat to IE << 37 c. Which suggests that *if* the *minimum* global temperature hits 40 c we're *all* stuffed. I don't say it will, I don't think it should, but if it *did* homo sapiens would probably be out of business in a fairly short time.
Well done for more field work and a *much* longer baseline.
"There are about half a dozen known vent provinces around the world with very little commonality of species between them. Instead it appears that different species evolve to occupy the same niches in different places."
Interesting. One option would have been that if they *had* evolved when the whole ocean was at 40 C they would be fairly similar as the ocean cooled and they had to retreat back to these hot pockets.
That suggests they evolved at their sites *after* the global hot period.
Thanks for the info.
"There is no reason for these utilities to not operate securely and out of physical reach of foreign countries. "
But it would probably cost *more*.
A vicious attack on the company profits is *much* more severe than some foreign govt/ex-employee/random blackmailer cutting off your water supply or causing you toilets to overflow (IIRC that happened in Australia but I could be wrong).
I'm glad he reminded MP's that this stuff pre-dates the current Home Sec by a *long* way and points out that this is a plan concocted, driven and run on a daily basis by a group of civil servants.
Lets not even talk about how much bigger the GCHQ budget will be to handle all this "data"
to follow the 0.003% (MI5 said it had about 2000 islamist suspects out of a UK pop of about 66 million) that *might* (at some point in the future) do *something*.
"After prosecuting several hundred completely innocent grannies, chavs, and the like the courts deem the system to be useless and cease pursuing prosecutions based on this evidence. Following this, the government mostly dismantles the system."
Good idea but the real benefit of this system is the creation of a climate of fear. The fact the system becomes *grossly* discredited in the courts will not stop its deployment.
Note. Neither it (nor ID cards) were needed to end the bombing campaigns of the IRA.
Notice how many *actual* islamist bombings have taken place since 2001 in what I think they still like to call "The Little Satan"
" I found myself looking at a row of little Swastikas and pictures of Adolf Hitler - I thought the philatelist's shop could have chosen it's window display more carefully."
F'nar, f'nar.
I had not realized Germany had repealed the law on Nazi symbols and memorabilia. Tricky given the swastika is a sacred symbol to IIRC 3 religions.
"In passing wrt BAe/EADS: didn't BAe not that long ago sell off its interests in Airbus? Would the current owner be EADS? Didn't BAe not that long ago sell off its interests in satellites (eg Stevenage?) Would the current owner be EADS?
Who in BAe has heard of the expression "constancy of purpose"? Which of them knows what it means, and acts accordingly? Answers on a blank postcard please."
they did. It seem all those French and Germans wandering around the place made them look too "European" for the liking of the DoD.
BAe seemed to embrace becoming a DoD con-tractor with the enthusiasm of a crack addicted teenage runaway taking up prostitution.
Smiling because the merger did not take place and I think EADS had a lucky escape.
Back in the day there used to be a company that essentially supplied a bank-in-a-box application for the IBM i-series.
Get banking license
Buy i-series
Install software
Add cash and branches.
For a number of lesser known banks that was *all* they needed.
Everything else was (effectively) *marketing*.
Any one who is familiar with the magazine "Money Facts" will know just how *alike* UK banks are when it comes to loans, accounts etc. I'd suggest *most* of the "difference" between them really is marketing and the particular ways they choose to screw their profit out of their target group.
Their press release implies that they will not be needing another test and are ready to move straight to launching the constellation on 2 F9 flights as scheduled. *no* reflight needed.
IOW $10m back to the bank account. Kerching and pints all around*
*Provided their insurer sees things their way of course.
I paraphrase
"We got enough data to not need *another* prototype being launched."
but
"The mission is a *complete* failure. When can we have our $10m insurance settlement?"
If satellite cost + Spacex launch fees < insurance payout OSC come out ahead on the deal.
TBF the satellite achieved *neither* a stable orbit (decent lifetime) nor its target altitude which you'd think would be in the policy as success criteria. So any kind of *endurance* or signal strength testing is virtually impossible
I predict Orbital will be having some very frank discussions with their insurers.
"by contrast a system with a truly negative temperature in absolute terms on the kelvin scale is hotter than any system with a positive temperature. If a negative-temperature system and a positive-temperature system come in contact, heat will flow from the negative- to the positive-temperature system."
So the temperature is a *ring*?
Which of course begs the question where does the *top* of the ring end and start going "negative"?
Bizarre.
"I am very disappointed to see so many of you complaining about patents. Why, if it weren't for the patent system, we would all be substantially worse off, as one AO has so recently pointed out. A case in point. Just tonight, I set about dealing with a stubborn splinter that had become lodged in my hand after a day of cutting branches. I decided to query Google to see what the state of the art in wood sliver removal technology might be. It showed to me the following two patents:
1. http://www.google.com/patents/US4570613, A method of removing splinters and the like from the human body,
2. http://www.google.com/patents/US5334195, A method and article for removing splinters where a disposable lancet is used to pierce the patient's skin
Think, all of you patent nay-sayers, how, if were not for the system of patents currently in force, such discoveries as the above might never seen the light of day. Reflect, ye doubters, that it is not only just but fitting that the holders of these patents, these discoverers, should be rewarded for their contributions to the welfare of all mankind."
Nice troll.
" when they had an in house system that could have prevented 9/11."
But it was invented by civil servants.
How could it *possibly* be better than something bought from a "reputable" government con-tractor?*
I'd view *all* such claims as very dubious. How much is this based on searching *all* the data trails based on the MO of the attackers. Once you *know* it's going to be multiple high jackings and crashing into buildings by foreign nationals how much of the data space is eliminated?
Now how about "We *believe* there will be an imminent large scale attack on this country by foreign nationals who may (or may not) be in this country" and watch the data space explode.
*Who probably got it originally off of either a university post grad thesis or some *other* government development project at a knock down price.
Formerly the Govt Interception Modernization Program.
Note that it is *also* about "communications data" and is also a warrentless system.
But how can "Trailblazer" have snooped the *whole* US public for "over a $1Bn" when the stuff to just support the UK ISP's in house hardware will be £1.8Bn? Granted this is over 10 yrs but did the NSA get a bulk discount?
"Personally, I think it's right that public bodies should suffer greater penalties than private. "
Why?
"public bodies" don't loose data. *people* loose data. Either by being *personally* careless, incompetent or stupid or by following *policies* which are lax, carelessly thought out or just plain dumb. IOW thought up by *people* who were being any (and possibly all) of the above.
I agree public bodies *demand* data and proceed to treat it as *their* data.
But blaming "public bodies" is like "computer says no." It's responsibility avoiding BS.
"Managers," "Directors," "COOs," "CEOs" want their big piles of cash. Let them take the weight or defend *themselves* if the poo hits the fan.
I cannot recall if the last DP Act *could* give the ICO power to prosecute as a *criminal* act (IE the CPS handle it) or to fine staff *directly* but I'm sure there are powers that the relevant Minister (Was it Jezzer Hunt per chance?) did not see fit to allow.
In aircraft design there is a process called a "Flight Readiness Review" for test pilot flying.
The senior engineers sign a document to the effect they have done everything they *know* to confirm the flight is necessary and as safe as possible. If it goes sideways and it turns out they *ignored* certain things, or failed to *fully* investigate requirements they are *personally* liable.
You get the big bucks. You take the big decisions and you take the big jail time. That works for me.
"A country where is is the norm for bin police to go through your rubbish, where 'anzeigen' is ingrained, in that if you cut your grass on late in the evening, put washing out on a Sunday, have a small barbecue on you balcony at the wrong time, allow you dog to bark after nine at night (true) there will always be someone who reports you the the authorities."
This is the abuse of petty authority.
Now which is the department responsible for the abuse of *major* authority?
Again this is not about "communications content " but communications "data".
Its the URL of *every web page you view
It's the header of every email you send. From/to/subject/when
It's the same for SMS + where you were when you sent *or* received it.
It's your whole phone bill *regardless* of how long the call was.
It's all this in *real* time.
Should you wish to *properly* afraid.
http://www.openrightsgroup.org/ourwork/reports/communications-data-bill%E2%80%93aka-the-snoopers-charter
"Believe it when I see it."
I guess you didn't happen to notice the roughly $11Bn NASA spent over a decade on CxP or as it was (unofficially known) Constellation. Shrubs contribution to the exploration space which resulted in *one* flight of a 5 segment Shuttle SRB (5th being a dummy) and a dummy 2nd stage after about 11 years, along with a chunk of what is now the Multi Purpose Crew Vehicle.
Still it kept a whole bunch of Mormons happy and the Utah Senator happy until SLS started running and they could start working on yet another solid rocket booster.